Mattress pressure redistribution: Overview, Uses and Top Manufacturer Company

Posted on February 26, 2026 | by drthomas

Introduction

Mattress pressure redistribution refers to a category of support surfaces—mattresses, mattress replacements, and overlays—designed to redistribute pressure at the skin–support interface and help manage contributing forces such as shear and friction. These clinical devices are used across hospitals, long-term care, rehabilitation, and sometimes home care, most commonly as part of broader pressure injury (also called pressure ulcer) prevention and management programs.

Why it matters: pressure injuries are safety events with human, clinical, and operational consequences. They can be painful for patients, complicate recovery, extend length of stay, and increase workload for clinical teams. For hospital administrators and procurement leaders, they also affect quality metrics, consumable use, rental spend, and biomedical engineering service demand.

This article is teaching-first and operationally practical. It explains what Mattress pressure redistribution is, where it is used, when it may or may not be appropriate, what you need before starting, basic operation, patient safety practices, how to interpret device outputs and alarms, troubleshooting, and infection prevention considerations. It also includes a high-level overview of manufacturers, distributors, and a country-by-country market snapshot.

This is informational content only and is not medical advice. Always follow local protocols and the manufacturer’s instructions for use (IFU).

What is Mattress pressure redistribution and why do we use it?

Mattress pressure redistribution is hospital equipment intended to reduce concentrated pressure on vulnerable body areas (commonly the sacrum/coccyx, heels, trochanters/hips, occiput, scapulae, and elbows), particularly in patients who cannot reposition independently or who have other risk factors for tissue damage. These support surfaces may be “reactive” (they respond to the patient’s weight and movement) or “active” (they periodically change pressure distribution using powered air systems).

Clear definition and purpose

At a practical level, Mattress pressure redistribution aims to:

Spread load over a larger contact area (reducing peak pressures).
Improve “immersion” (how much the body sinks into the surface) and “envelopment” (how well the surface conforms around the body).
Reduce shear and friction forces that can contribute to skin and soft-tissue injury.
Support microclimate management (heat and moisture at the skin surface), depending on design.

These devices range from high-specification foam mattresses to powered alternating-pressure systems with pumps and air cells. Some are integrated into a hospital bed frame; others are standalone mattress replacements or overlays.

Common clinical settings

You will see Mattress pressure redistribution in many care environments:

Intensive Care Unit (ICU), including ventilated and sedated patients.
Medical and surgical wards, especially for patients with reduced mobility.
Operating rooms (OR) and procedural suites for prolonged procedures (specialized surfaces and pads are also used).
Emergency departments during extended boarding.
Step-down units, high-dependency units, and stroke units.
Long-term care facilities and rehabilitation units.
Palliative and complex chronic care, where comfort and skin integrity are priorities.

Which surface is used, and how it is ordered or assigned, varies by facility policy, local supply, and clinical judgment.

Key benefits in patient care and workflow

In general terms, Mattress pressure redistribution can support:

Pressure injury prevention bundles (risk assessment, skin checks, repositioning plans, and moisture management).
Comfort and tolerance for extended bed rest (varies by patient and surface type).
Standardization of care: assigning defined support surfaces for defined risk tiers can simplify decision-making and documentation.
Staff workflow: some powered surfaces can reduce the need for frequent manual adjustments of bedding to address “bottoming out,” though they do not replace clinical monitoring.

It is important to avoid “device-only thinking.” A mattress is one risk control among many; it does not eliminate the need for routine skin assessment, safe movement and handling practices, and adherence to local protocols.

Plain-language mechanism of action (how it functions)

Most surfaces work through a combination of:

Material behavior: high-spec foam, gel, or hybrid materials deform under load to distribute pressure.
Air-cell engineering: air chambers (cells) are arranged to spread weight; some are powered to inflate/deflate in patterns.
Alternation cycles: in alternating-pressure systems, different cell groups inflate/deflate over a set cycle time to shift load away from any single area for prolonged periods.
Low-air-loss features: some powered surfaces circulate air to help reduce heat and moisture at the interface (microclimate). Whether this is present and how it performs varies by manufacturer and model.
Shear reduction features: covers and top layers may use low-friction materials and/or allow controlled movement to reduce shear.

A helpful mental model for learners: the surface aims to change the “map” of pressure distribution over time and improve the conditions at the skin interface. It is not a diagnostic device; it is a therapeutic/assistive support surface.

How medical students typically encounter or learn this device

Medical students and trainees commonly encounter Mattress pressure redistribution during:

Ward rounds where nursing teams request a higher-spec surface for a high-risk patient.
Rotations that manage immobility risks (geriatrics, neurology, orthopedics, ICU, trauma, burns).
Pressure injury education sessions (often led by wound care nurses, tissue viability teams, or nursing education).
Documentation practice: noting skin integrity, risk scores (for example, Braden Scale in some facilities), and preventive plans.

For trainees, a key learning objective is understanding that ordering the right medical equipment is part of patient safety—and that correct setup, monitoring, and cleaning are essential for effectiveness and harm prevention.

When should I use Mattress pressure redistribution (and when should I not)?

Selection of Mattress pressure redistribution is a clinical decision guided by patient condition, risk assessment, local protocols, and availability. Different surfaces exist for different levels of risk and clinical complexity, and not every patient benefits from the same technology.

Appropriate use cases (common scenarios)

Facilities commonly consider Mattress pressure redistribution for patients who have one or more of the following:

Limited mobility or inability to reposition independently.
Reduced sensation or impaired awareness (for example, sedation, delirium, neurologic injury).
Prolonged bed rest expected due to illness, surgery, or injury.
Existing pressure injury or high concern for skin breakdown (assessment and staging practices vary by facility).
Medical device–related pressure risk (for example, casts, braces, oxygen tubing contact points), recognizing the mattress addresses only part of the risk.
Hemodynamic or clinical instability where frequent repositioning is challenging (decisions are individualized).
Bariatric care needs where standard surfaces may not meet size/weight or immersion requirements (specialized bariatric systems may be required).
End-of-life or comfort-focused care where maintaining skin integrity and comfort is a priority.

Use criteria should be documented and aligned with a facility pathway (for example, a prevention bundle or a wound care consult process). Avoid “silent upgrades” without documentation, because they complicate auditing, rental management, and continuity of care.

Situations where it may not be suitable (or needs extra caution)

Mattress pressure redistribution may be unsuitable, or require additional precautions, in situations such as:

When a firm surface is required for specific procedures or assessments (facility protocols differ).
When patient movement must be minimized, particularly with active surfaces that alternate or rotate. Some surfaces have static modes, but suitability depends on the clinical scenario and local guidance.
When fall risk is high and the surface height or patient “sink-in” increases difficulty with transfers. This is a systems issue: bed height, side rail policy, and staffing all matter.
When the bed frame is incompatible with the mattress system (dimension mismatch, side rail gaps, entrapment hazards).
When electrical safety cannot be assured, such as damaged power cords, lack of grounded outlets, or unreliable power without backup planning.
When the patient exceeds the weight or size limits of the system (risk of bottoming out, mechanical failure, or ineffective pressure redistribution).

Safety cautions and contraindications (general, non-clinical)

Because this is hospital equipment used on vulnerable patients, common non-clinical cautions include:

Weight limits and patient size compatibility: always confirm the safe working load and recommended patient weight range (varies by manufacturer and model).
Entrapment and fit: incorrect mattress width/length relative to the bed frame can create gaps near side rails.
Overlay stacking: adding extra foam overlays, thick pads, or multiple underpads can change how the system performs and may increase heat/moisture; follow IFU and local policy.
Line and tube management: hoses, catheters, drains, and monitoring cables can become kinked or compressed when a patient immerses deeply.
Power dependence: powered systems require contingency plans for power failure, transport, and emergency procedures.

Clinical contraindications (in the medical sense) depend on patient condition and therapy goals and should be defined by local policy and clinical leadership. When in doubt, escalate to a supervising clinician, the wound care/tissue viability service, or the unit educator.

Emphasize clinical judgment, supervision, and local protocols

A practical rule for trainees: if you are considering “upgrading the mattress,” treat it like any other intervention. Clarify the indication, verify the order pathway, ensure correct setup, and document what was done. For administrators: ensure the pathway exists, is teachable, and is auditable.

What do I need before starting?

Successful and safe use of Mattress pressure redistribution depends on more than the mattress itself. It requires the right environment, accessories, trained users, and operational support.

Required setup, environment, and accessories

Common requirements include:

Compatible bed frame: correct dimensions and side rail configuration for the mattress model.
Reliable power (for powered systems): grounded outlet, cable routing that avoids trip hazards, and awareness of emergency power outlets where applicable.
Space for the pump: many systems hang at the foot-end; ensure vents are not blocked and the pump is secured.
Mattress cover and components: top cover, internal air cells/foam core, hoses, quick-connect fittings, and (often) a CPR quick-release/deflation feature.
Transport planning: if the patient is moved off-unit, confirm whether the mattress stays with the bed and whether the pump can accompany the patient or must be disconnected (varies by facility workflow).

Facilities may also require specific accessories:

Additional incontinence pads approved for use with the surface.
Heel offloading devices (separate from the mattress).
Slide sheets and transfer aids compatible with the surface’s friction characteristics.
Bed exit alarms integrated into the bed system (if used locally).

Training and competency expectations

Because Mattress pressure redistribution affects safety, many facilities expect competency for:

Identifying device type (foam vs powered alternating vs low-air-loss, etc.).
Correct placement and securing to the bed.
Setting patient weight or firmness (if applicable).
Performing a “bottoming out” check (method varies; follow local guidance).
Recognizing and responding to alarms.
Safe patient handling on a higher-immersion surface (turning, lateral transfers, sitting at edge of bed).
Infection prevention cleaning steps and what to do if the cover is damaged.

Training should include not just “how to turn it on,” but also alarm response and escalation pathways. For rotating staff and trainees, quick-reference guides at the bedside can reduce error.

Pre-use checks and documentation

A practical pre-use checklist (adapt to your facility):

Confirm the correct Mattress pressure redistribution system is assigned for the patient’s risk level.
Inspect mattress cover for tears, punctures, worn seams, or broken zippers.
Confirm the mattress is correctly oriented (head/foot labeling) and secured.
Check hoses and connectors for kinks, cracks, or loose fittings.
Power on the pump; confirm self-test completes and alarms function.
Set patient weight/comfort level if required by the model.
Allow full inflation and confirm the patient is supported (bottoming out check per protocol).
Document surface type, settings/mode, and start time in the clinical record or equipment log (local practice varies).

From an operations perspective, documentation supports auditing, rental tracking, and event investigation if a device issue arises.

Operational prerequisites: commissioning, maintenance readiness, consumables, and policies

For biomedical engineering and operations teams, readiness typically includes:

Commissioning/acceptance testing: verify device matches purchase specs, labeling, and basic function; electrical safety checks per local standards.
Preventive maintenance (PM) plan: schedule for pump inspection, filters, hose integrity, performance checks, and asset tagging.
Repair workflow: loaner pool, turnaround times, and escalation to the manufacturer or authorized service partner.
Consumables: filters, replacement covers, hoses, connectors, and approved cleaning products.
Policies: cleaning/turnover policy, “do not use” tagging, storage requirements, and criteria for upgrading/downgrading surfaces.

A common failure mode in hospitals is buying advanced equipment without funding the service ecosystem (training time, spare parts, and downtime coverage).

Roles and responsibilities (clinician vs. biomedical engineering vs. procurement)

Clear role separation reduces safety gaps:

Clinicians (physicians/advanced practice providers): identify need, place orders where required, and align surface choice with clinical goals and restrictions.
Nursing and wound care teams: perform setup (in many facilities), monitor skin and comfort, respond to alarms, and document ongoing use.
Biomedical/clinical engineering: PM, repairs, performance verification, asset management, and technical incident investigation.
Procurement/supply chain: vendor qualification, contract terms, service levels, rental vs capital decisions, and standardization across units.
Infection prevention: defines cleaning/disinfection pathways, audit criteria, and outbreak-related controls.

In well-run hospitals, Mattress pressure redistribution is treated as a program, not a one-off purchase.

How do I use it correctly (basic operation)?

Basic operation varies by model, but most Mattress pressure redistribution systems follow a predictable workflow. Always defer to the manufacturer IFU and facility policy.

Basic step-by-step workflow (commonly universal)

Verify the order/pathway (if required): confirm the indicated surface type and any restrictions (for example, static vs alternating modes).
Prepare the bed: set bed brakes, adjust to a safe working height, and remove incompatible overlays.
Install the mattress: place it correctly oriented; secure straps if present; confirm corners sit properly.
Mount and connect the pump (powered surfaces): hang/secure the pump; connect hoses firmly; avoid sharp bends and pinch points.
Power on: plug directly into an appropriate outlet; avoid extension cords unless approved by facility engineering.
Select mode and settings: enter patient weight or choose a comfort/firmness setting if required.
Allow full inflation: wait for the system to reach operating pressure; confirm no alarms.
Place the patient on the surface: use safe patient handling techniques; ensure lines/tubes are not trapped under the patient.
Confirm support: perform a bottoming out check as trained; confirm the patient is centered and aligned.
Document: record surface type, mode/settings, and monitoring plan per local protocol.
Monitor and reassess: check patient comfort, skin condition, and device status at defined intervals.

Setup and calibration (if relevant)

Many powered systems are “set-and-adjust” rather than calibrated like measurement devices. Common setup steps that function like calibration include:

Patient weight entry: drives internal pressure targets; incorrect entry can lead to poor immersion or excessive firmness.
Auto-firm / max inflate: temporarily increases firmness for transfers or procedures; remember to return to therapeutic mode afterward.
Static vs alternating selection: static provides constant support; alternating changes pressure distribution over time. Suitability depends on patient tolerance and clinical goals.

If a unit uses multiple models, standardize where possible (for example, default cycle times or default modes) to reduce variability. Any standardization should be approved by clinical leadership and aligned with IFU.

Typical settings and what they generally mean

Terminology differs, but common modes include:

Static: constant pressure distribution; may be used for patients who cannot tolerate movement.
Alternating: the system inflates/deflates cell groups on a timed cycle to shift load.
Low air loss: airflow through the surface to help manage heat/moisture (feature depends on model).
Seat/Chair mode: adjusts inflation when the head of bed is elevated; intended to reduce “hammocking” and improve stability (exact behavior varies).
Turn assist: inflates side bolsters or sections to help staff reposition patients (staff still control the turn).
Transport mode: maintains inflation during short moves; some systems rely on internal air retention rather than battery operation (varies by manufacturer).
CPR deflate: rapid deflation to allow effective compressions on a firmer surface; know where the release is and how it works.

Operationally, the most common avoidable error is leaving a patient on “max inflate” or “firm” after a transfer. Build a habit: if you used a temporary mode, actively return to the intended therapy mode and document it.

Steps that are commonly universal across models

Even with different brands, these principles tend to be universal:

Confirm correct bed–mattress fit to reduce entrapment risk.
Ensure the pump is running and airflow is unobstructed.
Keep hoses unkinked and connectors fully seated.
Avoid adding unapproved thick overlays that alter pressure redistribution.
Perform routine checks for bottoming out and skin condition per protocol.
Treat alarms as actionable events, not background noise.

How do I keep the patient safe?

Patient safety with Mattress pressure redistribution depends on device integrity, appropriate settings, human factors (training and alarm response), and ongoing clinical monitoring. A well-set mattress can still be unsafe if the patient slides, becomes entrapped, or if alarms are ignored.

Safety practices and monitoring

Common safety practices include:

Skin and comfort checks: observe skin integrity and patient comfort regularly and document per local protocol. Device performance must be correlated with patient findings.
Positioning and alignment: ensure the patient is centered; check for “hammocking” (bridging) where the body is supported unevenly.
Heel and bony prominence awareness: the mattress addresses whole-body support, but some high-risk areas may need additional risk controls per protocol.
Moisture and heat monitoring: excessive sweating, fever, and incontinence can change microclimate; bedding choices can also trap heat and moisture.
Line/tube safety: ensure oxygen tubing, catheters, drains, and monitoring leads are not under tension or compressed.
Transfer and mobility safety: higher-immersion surfaces can make edge-of-bed sitting and transfers more challenging. Use safe patient handling aids and adequate staffing.

For administrators: consider including Mattress pressure redistribution in fall prevention risk reviews, because surface characteristics can affect patient mobility and stability.

Alarm handling and human factors

Powered systems typically include alarms such as:

Low pressure (system not reaching target pressure; potential bottoming out).
Power failure (mains disconnected or outage).
System fault/service required (pump or sensor issue).
Disconnected hose/air leak (loss of pressure).

Human factors that commonly drive adverse events:

Alarm volume turned down or muted without a plan.
Staff unfamiliar with a new model after procurement changes.
Misinterpretation of alarms as “nuisance” rather than safety signals.
Inconsistent responsibility: “Who responds to mattress alarms?” should be explicit on the unit.

A practical safety culture goal is to treat alarm response like infusion pump alarms: immediate triage, patient-first assessment, and documented resolution.

Follow facility protocols and manufacturer guidance

To reduce harm, align with:

Manufacturer IFU: approved cleaning agents, weight limits, compatible bed frames, and recommended settings.
Facility protocols: risk assessment tool use, monitoring frequency, escalation to wound care, and incident reporting.
Biomedical engineering guidance: PM schedules and criteria for removing a unit from service.

If local protocols conflict with IFU, that is an organizational risk that should be escalated to clinical governance and equipment committees.

Risk controls, labeling checks, and incident reporting culture

Key risk controls include:

Labeling verification: confirm model, serial number, weight limits, and service/inspection status.
Compatibility checks: mattress dimensions match the bed and side rails; avoid “almost fits” scenarios.
Do-not-use criteria: torn covers, persistent pressure alarms, visible fluid ingress, or damaged cords should trigger removal from service.
Incident reporting: encourage reporting of near misses (for example, repeated low-pressure alarms, unexplained deflations, or patient sliding). These events can reveal system-level issues like inadequate training or poor maintenance.

For trainees: if you see a pressure injury developing or worsening, the correct response is not only “change the mattress,” but also to communicate, document, and escalate according to the facility’s pathway.

How do I interpret the output?

Unlike monitors that produce physiologic numbers, Mattress pressure redistribution typically provides operational outputs: modes, settings, and alarms. Some advanced systems may provide additional data (for example, pressure mapping or usage logs), but availability varies by manufacturer.

Types of outputs/readings

Common outputs include:

Mode indicator: static, alternating, low air loss, seat mode, etc.
Patient weight setting or firmness level: may be numeric (kg/lb) or a comfort scale.
Cycle time: alternating systems may display a cycle duration or phase.
Alarm codes/messages: low pressure, leak, power, service, hose disconnect.
Service indicators: filter replacement reminders, PM due (varies by model and facility tagging).
Status lights: therapy active, max inflate active, CPR valve open (varies).

Some systems can integrate with hospital asset tracking or connectivity tools, but this is not universal and may be limited by IT policy.

How clinicians typically interpret them

Clinicians and nurses commonly use outputs to answer practical questions:

Is the patient on the intended therapy mode?
Is the system functioning (inflated and stable)?
Do alarms suggest an immediate safety risk (bottoming out, power loss)?
Is the patient weight entry correct and plausible?
Has a temporary mode (max inflate) been left on?

The “interpretation” is operational: it guides actions such as checking the patient’s support, correcting settings, or escalating for maintenance.

Common pitfalls and limitations

Frequent pitfalls include:

Assuming therapy is active because the pump is on: the system may be running but not reaching pressure due to leaks or open CPR valves.
Wrong patient weight entry: leads to over- or under-inflation and can affect stability and comfort.
Bedding artifacts: thick pads and multiple layers can reduce immersion/envelopment and increase heat/moisture, even if the pump displays normal status.
Alarm fatigue: repeated low-pressure alarms may be ignored rather than investigated (kinked hose, loose connector, leak).
Overreliance on the surface: a normal device status does not rule out pressure injury risk; clinical correlation remains essential.

Emphasize artifacts and clinical correlation

Any “output” must be interpreted in context. A mattress can display normal settings while the patient is sliding, sitting on a wrinkled sheet, or experiencing device-related pressure from oxygen tubing. Conversely, a transient alarm may reflect a temporary repositioning maneuver rather than a true fault. Use outputs as prompts to assess the patient and the system, not as definitive proof of safety.

What if something goes wrong?

When Mattress pressure redistribution malfunctions—or is suspected to malfunction—prioritize patient safety, then secure the device for evaluation and document what happened. Facilities should have clear escalation pathways to biomedical engineering and, when needed, the manufacturer.

Troubleshooting checklist (practical and non-brand-specific)

If the mattress is not inflating properly or an alarm sounds:

Check the patient first: comfort, stability, signs of bottoming out, and any immediate risk (for example, sliding toward foot-end).
Confirm mains power: plug seated, outlet working, no tripped breaker, and power switch on.
Check pump placement: vents unobstructed, pump not covered by linens, secure mounting.
Inspect hoses: firmly connected, not kinked, not trapped under bed frame, no visible cracks.
Verify CPR/deflate valve position: fully closed for normal operation.
Confirm settings: correct mode, patient weight/firmness entry, and that max inflate isn’t stuck or incorrectly selected.
Look for leaks: listen for airflow, inspect mattress cover and hose junctions.
Reduce confounders: remove unapproved overlays or excessive pads if facility policy allows.
Reassess after corrective steps: confirm alarm cleared and patient support restored.

If the issue repeats, treat it as a potential device fault rather than a user error.

When to stop use

Stop use and remove from service per facility policy if there is:

Persistent low-pressure alarm with evidence of bottoming out.
Visible damage to cover, cells, hoses, connectors, or power cord.
Suspected fluid ingress into the pump or electrical components.
Burning smell, smoke, unusual heat, or electrical sparking.
Any safety event where device function is uncertain (for example, unexplained deflation associated with patient harm).

The safe interim plan varies by unit: it may involve switching to a backup foam mattress, using a different Mattress pressure redistribution unit, or moving the patient to another bed. Follow local protocols and supervision.

When to escalate to biomedical engineering or the manufacturer

Escalate when:

A fault persists after basic checks.
The pump indicates “service required” or a system fault code.
There is repeated alarm behavior across multiple patients/units (suggesting systemic maintenance or training issues).
Parts are needed (replacement cover, hose set, filter, or pump).

Biomedical engineering typically handles triage, testing, and coordination with authorized service. Manufacturer involvement is important for recurring failures, warranty claims, and any incident with potential safety implications.

Documentation and safety reporting expectations (general)

Documentation should capture:

Date/time, unit, and patient context (without unnecessary identifiers if reporting outside the medical record).
Device model/serial or asset tag.
Mode/settings at the time of issue.
Alarm messages/codes and observed behavior.
Immediate patient safety actions taken.
Who was notified (charge nurse, biomedical engineering, risk management).

Facilities may have formal medical device incident reporting processes. Regulatory reporting requirements vary by country and jurisdiction; local risk management and biomedical engineering teams typically guide whether and how external reporting occurs.

Infection control and cleaning of Mattress pressure redistribution

Mattress pressure redistribution is generally a non-critical medical device (contacts intact skin), but it is high-risk for contamination because it is used continuously and may be exposed to sweat, wound drainage, incontinence, and respiratory secretions. Effective cleaning and inspection are essential for patient safety and device longevity.

Cleaning principles

Key principles that apply broadly:

Clean and disinfect between patients and whenever visibly soiled.
Use only disinfectants compatible with the mattress cover and pump surfaces (varies by manufacturer).
Respect disinfectant contact times (wet time) required for efficacy.
Avoid fluid ingress: do not soak pumps or allow liquids into vents and electrical openings.
Inspect while cleaning: find tears, seam failures, or zipper damage early.

Where mattress covers are removable, laundering processes must align with IFU (temperature limits, chemical restrictions, and drying methods).

Disinfection vs. sterilization (general)

Cleaning removes visible soil and reduces bioburden; it is a prerequisite for effective disinfection.
Disinfection uses chemicals to reduce microorganisms to an acceptable level for non-critical equipment.
Sterilization eliminates all microbial life and is not typically used for mattresses and pumps.

If a facility needs enhanced measures (for example, during an outbreak), infection prevention teams define additional steps such as quarantine, enhanced disinfection, or use of specific barrier covers—always within IFU constraints.

High-touch points

Even though the patient lies on the mattress, high-touch contamination often occurs on:

Pump control panel (buttons, knobs, touchscreen).
Pump handle and mounting hooks.
Power cord and plug.
Hoses and quick-connect fittings.
CPR deflate handle/valve.
Mattress cover zipper pulls and seams.
Foot-end and head-end corners used for repositioning.

These are easy to miss during turnover unless explicitly listed in a cleaning checklist.

Example cleaning workflow (non-brand-specific)

A typical workflow (adapt to policy and IFU):

Perform hand hygiene and don appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE).
Disconnect power and secure cords to avoid dragging on the floor.
Remove linens and dispose of single-use items per policy.
Clean visible soil from the mattress cover using approved detergent/cleaner if required.
Disinfect the mattress cover systematically from clean to dirty areas, paying attention to seams and zipper tracks.
Disinfect hoses and connectors; avoid forcing fluid into openings.
Disinfect the pump exterior and control panel; do not spray directly into vents.
Allow surfaces to remain wet for the required contact time; then allow to dry fully.
Inspect for damage (tears, punctures, seam separation) and tag for repair if needed.
Document completion per unit process (checklist, log, or barcode scan).

Follow the manufacturer IFU and facility infection prevention policy

IFU and infection prevention policy determine:

Which disinfectants are acceptable (and which degrade materials).
Whether covers are wipeable only or launderable.
Whether internal components (air cells) can be accessed for cleaning.
How to handle contamination with body fluids.
Storage conditions after cleaning (drying time, dust protection, separation of clean/dirty equipment).

When facilities deviate from IFU (for example, using a stronger chemical), they risk damaging covers, increasing fluid ingress, and shortening device lifespan.

Medical Device Companies & OEMs

Mattress pressure redistribution products are sold under many brands, but the supply chain is often more complex than it appears. Understanding manufacturer and OEM relationships helps hospitals evaluate quality, serviceability, and lifecycle cost.

Manufacturer vs. OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer)

A manufacturer is the company that markets the finished product under its name and typically holds responsibility for product documentation, labeling, IFU, and post-market support in the markets where it sells.
An OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) may produce key components (for example, pumps, valves, air cells, or covers) that are then integrated into the branded product.

In some cases, a single physical device platform is sold under multiple labels in different regions, with variations in accessories or service arrangements. This can be normal, but it has implications for training, spare parts, and technical support.

How OEM relationships impact quality, support, and service

From a hospital operations perspective, OEM relationships can affect:

Spare parts availability: whether parts can be sourced locally or must be imported.
Service manuals and diagnostic tools: whether biomedical engineering has access, and under what conditions.
Warranty terms: who authorizes repairs and what actions void warranty.
Consistency of IFU: whether cleaning and setup instructions match the actual component materials.
Recall and field safety actions: communication clarity across brand/OEM boundaries.

Procurement teams often benefit from asking direct questions: Who makes the pump? Who makes the cover? Where are repairs performed? What is the typical turnaround time? What is the expected life of covers and hoses (varies by manufacturer and use)?

Top 5 World Best Medical Device Companies / Manufacturers

Because verified rankings depend on specific sources and criteria, the list below is example industry leaders (not a ranking) that are commonly recognized in hospital equipment portfolios and may offer hospital beds and/or support surfaces in some markets. Product availability and regional presence vary by manufacturer.

Stryker
Stryker is widely known for acute care hospital equipment, including beds and related support technologies in many markets. In facilities that standardize bed fleets, the support surface strategy is often evaluated alongside bed functionality and patient handling features. Service coverage and availability can vary by country and by contract model.
Baxter (Hillrom portfolio in many markets)
Baxter is a major healthcare company with a broad hospital footprint, and in many regions it includes the Hillrom portfolio of hospital equipment. Depending on the country, that portfolio may include beds and support surface options that relate to Mattress pressure redistribution. For buyers, an important practical consideration is how service is delivered (direct vs authorized partner).
Arjo
Arjo is recognized in many regions for patient handling, mobilization, and pressure management solutions used in hospitals and long-term care. Hospitals often evaluate Arjo products as part of broader safe patient handling and pressure injury prevention programs. As with all vendors, availability of specific mattress models and service response times vary by country.
Getinge (including critical care and bed-related solutions in some markets)
Getinge has a global presence in acute care and perioperative environments. In some markets, its offerings include critical care infrastructure that can interface with bed platforms and support surfaces. For procurement teams, clarifying the exact scope of Mattress pressure redistribution products and local service capability is essential.
LINET Group
LINET Group is known in many regions for hospital beds and care environment equipment, with products often used in acute and long-term care settings. Depending on configuration and region, bed platforms may be paired with specialized mattress systems and accessories. Buyers should verify compatibility, cleaning requirements, and service pathways for the specific Mattress pressure redistribution configuration offered locally.

Vendors, Suppliers, and Distributors

Hospitals rarely buy Mattress pressure redistribution directly from a factory. More often, they purchase or rent through intermediaries that handle contracting, delivery, training logistics, and after-sales support.

Role differences between vendor, supplier, and distributor

These terms are sometimes used interchangeably, but they can mean different things operationally:

A vendor is the commercial entity a hospital contracts with. The vendor may be the manufacturer, an authorized dealer, or a rental provider.
A supplier is a broader term for an organization that provides goods or services; it may include vendors, group purchasing organizations, and service companies.
A distributor typically buys, warehouses, and resells products, handling logistics, invoicing, and sometimes first-line support.

For Mattress pressure redistribution, a distributor may also manage a local fleet (including rentals), provide cleaning/turnaround services, and coordinate repairs—functions that directly affect clinical uptime.

Top 5 World Best Vendors / Suppliers / Distributors

Because verified global rankings depend on sources and market definitions, the list below is example global distributors (not a ranking) known for healthcare supply chain operations. Not all organizations distribute Mattress pressure redistribution in every country, and many mattresses are distributed through regional authorized dealers.

Medline Industries
Medline is widely recognized for distributing medical supplies and hospital consumables, and in some regions it also supplies broader categories of hospital equipment. Large distributors can support standardized purchasing, inventory programs, and consolidated billing. For Mattress pressure redistribution, buyers should clarify whether delivery, setup training, and repair coordination are included.
McKesson
McKesson is a major healthcare supply chain organization with strong presence in certain markets. Distributors of this scale typically offer contracting support and logistics services that help hospitals manage high-volume procurement. For equipment like mattresses, confirm the local service model, lead times, and whether rentals are available through partners.
Cardinal Health
Cardinal Health is known for distribution and supply chain services in healthcare. Depending on region and product category, it may be involved in supplying clinical consumables and some equipment through contracted programs. Hospitals should verify product scope, after-sales support, and whether Mattress pressure redistribution is handled directly or via authorized sub-distributors.
Owens & Minor
Owens & Minor is recognized for healthcare logistics and distribution services, particularly in certain geographies. For hospitals aiming to reduce vendor count, distributors may bundle consumables with select equipment categories. For Mattress pressure redistribution, the practical question is whether the distributor provides on-site support, training coordination, and returns processing.
Bunzl (healthcare supply operations in multiple regions)
Bunzl operates supply and distribution businesses in multiple countries, often focused on consumables and essential supplies. In some settings, organizations like this support standardized procurement and reliable delivery to large networks. For Mattress pressure redistribution, hospitals should confirm whether mattresses are supplied directly, through partners, or outside the distributor’s usual portfolio.

Global Market Snapshot by Country

Below is a practical, non-numerical snapshot of demand drivers and market characteristics for Mattress pressure redistribution and related services. Local procurement rules, reimbursement, and service infrastructure vary widely, so these are broad patterns rather than definitive statements.

India

Demand for Mattress pressure redistribution is influenced by rapid expansion of private hospitals, ICU capacity growth, and increasing attention to quality and accreditation in urban centers. Many facilities rely on imports for advanced powered systems, while local manufacturing and assembly may support basic foam and selected air systems. Service ecosystems are stronger in metro areas; rural hospitals may face limited access to trained service and slower spare-part turnaround.

China

China’s large hospital system and ongoing modernization support steady demand for clinical device categories including support surfaces. Domestic manufacturing capacity is substantial, and procurement may involve centralized tendering with strong price pressure. High-tier urban hospitals are more likely to adopt advanced Mattress pressure redistribution technologies, while lower-resource settings may prioritize simpler surfaces and local service availability.

United States

In the United States, demand is shaped by patient safety programs focused on hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPI), reimbursement considerations, and established wound care pathways. Hospitals frequently evaluate Mattress pressure redistribution as part of broader bed and safe patient handling strategies, with a mix of ownership and rental models. A mature service ecosystem exists, but standardization across multi-hospital systems and controlling rental spend remain common operational priorities.

Indonesia

Indonesia’s market is characterized by uneven access between major cities and outer islands, making logistics and service coverage key considerations for hospital equipment. Private hospitals in urban areas may adopt a wider range of Mattress pressure redistribution systems, while public facilities may face tighter budgets and procurement constraints. Import dependence for advanced powered surfaces is common, and training consistency can be challenged by staff turnover and variable equipment fleets.

Pakistan

Pakistan’s demand is driven by tertiary care growth in major cities and the need to support critically ill and immobile patients in public and private hospitals. Many advanced Mattress pressure redistribution systems are imported, and buyer decisions often weigh upfront cost against local service capability. Outside large urban centers, access to reliable maintenance and replacement parts can be a limiting factor.

Nigeria

Nigeria’s market reflects strong needs in tertiary urban hospitals and private facilities, alongside infrastructure constraints that influence equipment selection. Import dependence is common for powered Mattress pressure redistribution, and power reliability can affect operational continuity and risk planning. Service capacity and trained biomedical engineering coverage may be concentrated in major cities, influencing uptime and procurement decisions.

Brazil

Brazil has a sizable healthcare market with both public and private sectors, and demand for pressure management surfaces is tied to hospital modernization and quality initiatives. Local distribution networks are important, and procurement may involve complex tender and compliance processes in public systems. Regional disparities affect service availability, with stronger support in larger urban centers than in remote areas.

Bangladesh

Bangladesh’s demand is growing with expanding private hospitals and increasing ICU capability, particularly in large cities. Many advanced Mattress pressure redistribution devices are imported, and facilities often prioritize reliability, easy cleaning, and readily available parts. Training and consistent protocol implementation can be challenging where staffing is stretched and equipment fleets are heterogeneous.

Russia

Russia’s market includes large urban hospitals with capacity for advanced hospital equipment, alongside regional variability in access and modernization pace. Import logistics, local regulatory pathways, and service coverage influence which Mattress pressure redistribution products are commonly deployed. Facilities may prioritize durable designs and clear service arrangements due to the operational impact of downtime.

Mexico

Mexico’s demand is shaped by a mix of public and private healthcare delivery, with advanced equipment more concentrated in private networks and major public referral centers. Procurement and lifecycle support are key differentiators, particularly where hospitals balance capital purchase versus rental models. Urban areas typically have better distributor coverage and biomedical service depth than rural regions.

Ethiopia

In Ethiopia, demand is concentrated in tertiary hospitals and expanding private facilities in major cities, while many rural settings remain resource-constrained. Import dependence for powered Mattress pressure redistribution is common, and buyers often focus on ruggedness, simple operation, and training support. Service ecosystems can be limited, making availability of spare parts and local repair capability a decisive factor.

Japan

Japan’s aging population and strong hospital and long-term care sectors contribute to sustained interest in pressure management technologies. Facilities often emphasize product quality, infection prevention compatibility, and standardized protocols, with careful attention to patient comfort and caregiver workflow. Domestic and regional supply chains support availability, though model preferences and procurement pathways differ by institution type.

Philippines

In the Philippines, demand is strongest in urban private hospitals and major public medical centers, where ICU and surgical volumes drive needs for support surfaces. Import dependence is common for advanced powered Mattress pressure redistribution, and service support quality may vary by distributor. Geographic dispersion across islands highlights the importance of logistics, training, and predictable maintenance turnaround.

Egypt

Egypt’s market includes large public hospitals and a growing private sector, with demand linked to critical care expansion and quality improvement initiatives. Many advanced Mattress pressure redistribution systems are imported, and procurement often evaluates vendor training and local service capacity. Access disparities between major cities and rural areas can affect equipment availability and ongoing support.

Democratic Republic of the Congo

In the Democratic Republic of the Congo, demand is often shaped by concentrated tertiary services in major cities and significant constraints in infrastructure and supply chains elsewhere. Import dependence and complex logistics can limit availability of powered Mattress pressure redistribution systems. Where service ecosystems are limited, facilities may favor simpler, maintainable surfaces and prioritize basic infection prevention compatibility.

Vietnam

Vietnam’s expanding hospital sector and increasing surgical and ICU capacity contribute to rising interest in pressure management equipment. Imports play a significant role for advanced systems, while local distribution networks vary in maturity by region. Hospitals often weigh cost, training support, and maintenance responsiveness, particularly outside large urban centers.

Iran

Iran has substantial clinical capacity in major cities and a need for reliable hospital equipment across a wide range of care settings. Procurement may balance domestic production with imports depending on category and availability, and service arrangements are a key determinant of long-term value. Facilities often focus on durability, spare-part access, and compatibility with local cleaning and infection prevention practices.

Turkey

Turkey’s large healthcare sector, including urban tertiary centers and medical tourism hubs, supports demand for advanced hospital equipment including support surfaces. Hospitals may prioritize modern features, patient comfort, and service responsiveness as differentiators. A developed distribution ecosystem exists in many areas, but access and product mix can still vary across regions and facility types.

Germany

Germany’s market is shaped by well-established hospital infrastructure, strong standards for patient safety and infection prevention, and structured procurement processes. Demand for Mattress pressure redistribution is closely linked to clinical protocols, documentation expectations, and lifecycle service planning. Buyers often emphasize evidence alignment, service contracts, and total cost of ownership, with robust access to trained technical support.

Thailand

Thailand’s demand is influenced by expanding private hospital networks, public sector modernization, and care for aging populations. Urban centers often have better access to a range of Mattress pressure redistribution technologies and vendor support, while rural settings may have more limited options. Procurement decisions frequently weigh reliability, ease of cleaning, training support, and availability of maintenance services.

Key Takeaways and Practical Checklist for Mattress pressure redistribution

Treat Mattress pressure redistribution as part of a prevention and safety program, not a standalone fix.
Always follow the manufacturer IFU and your facility policy for setup, modes, and cleaning.
Confirm bed frame compatibility to reduce entrapment risk and ensure correct fit.
Verify patient weight limits and safe working load before placing a patient on the surface.
Do not assume “pump on” means “patient protected”; confirm inflation and support.
Enter patient weight/firmness settings carefully; wrong inputs can undermine performance.
Use “max inflate/auto-firm” only as a temporary mode and return to therapy mode afterward.
Keep hoses unkinked and connectors fully seated to prevent low-pressure alarms.
Make the CPR deflate feature easy to access and ensure staff know how it works.
Plan for power failure: know what happens to inflation and what your unit’s contingency is.
Minimize unnecessary bedding layers that can trap heat/moisture or alter immersion.
Reassess skin integrity and patient comfort at intervals defined by local protocol.
Monitor for patient sliding, instability, or transfer difficulty on higher-immersion surfaces.
Coordinate safe patient handling practices; the mattress changes friction and movement dynamics.
Check that lines, tubes, and drains are not trapped or tensioned after repositioning.
Treat repeated alarms as safety signals that require investigation, not “nuisance noise.”
Standardize models where possible to reduce training burden and user error across units.
Ensure unit-level clarity on “who responds to mattress alarms” on every shift.
Keep a documented “remove from service” threshold (torn cover, persistent low pressure, damaged cord).
Tag and isolate faulty equipment so it is not mistakenly returned to clinical use.
Document surface type and settings in the record to support continuity and auditing.
Include Mattress pressure redistribution in pressure injury governance, procurement, and education plans.
Build a spare/loaner strategy so patient care is not delayed by repairs or cleaning turnaround.
Align cleaning products with IFU to avoid cover degradation and fluid ingress over time.
Train environmental services and nursing on high-touch points (pump panel, hoses, CPR valve, seams).
Inspect covers routinely for seam failure, punctures, and zipper issues during cleaning.
Clarify whether the device is owned, rented, or on consignment to avoid hidden lifecycle costs.
Evaluate total cost of ownership, including covers, filters, repairs, and downtime coverage.
Confirm local service capability and spare-part availability before standardizing a model.
Use a commissioning/acceptance test process for new devices before clinical deployment.
Maintain preventive maintenance schedules and keep asset tags/service labels visible.
Establish a clear escalation pathway to biomedical engineering and the manufacturer.
Report adverse events and near misses to strengthen system learning and prevention.
Avoid unapproved overlays or modifications that change performance and increase liability.
Incorporate device checks into bedside safety rounds to catch issues early.
Ensure transport workflows specify whether the pump travels with the bed and how alarms are managed.
Consider patient-specific factors (comfort, movement tolerance, fall risk) when selecting modes.
Use consistent handoff communication when patients move between units with different mattress fleets.
Keep quick-reference guides available at point of care for mixed-model environments.
Re-evaluate the need for the surface as the patient’s mobility and risk profile change.

If you are looking for contributions and suggestion for this content please drop an email to contact@myhospitalnow.com

Find Trusted Cardiac Hospitals

Compare heart hospitals by city and services — all in one place.

Explore Hospitals

Ready for a New You? Start with the Right Hospital.