Surgical video monitor: Overview, Uses and Top Manufacturer Company

Posted on February 27, 2026 | by drthomas

Introduction

A Surgical video monitor is a medical device designed to display real-time (and sometimes recorded) images from a surgical camera, endoscope, laparoscope, arthroscope, surgical microscope, or other video-generating clinical equipment. In modern operating rooms (ORs) and procedure suites, the Surgical video monitor is often the “shared visual field” for the surgeon, assistants, nurses, anesthetists, trainees, and—when appropriate—remote observers.

Why it matters: surgical visualization is directly tied to workflow, teamwork, and safety. A clear, stable, correctly configured image can support efficient technique, accurate anatomical orientation, and better communication across the sterile and non-sterile team. Conversely, a poorly positioned or misconfigured monitor can contribute to fatigue, confusion, delays, and avoidable interruptions.

This article is teaching-first and operations-aware. You will learn what a Surgical video monitor is, where it is used, and what it typically connects to. You’ll also learn practical setup and operating steps, common safety risks (electrical, mechanical, infection-control, human factors, and information security), how to interpret what you see on the screen, and what to do when problems occur. Finally, you’ll get a global market snapshot (country-by-country) and a practical checklist useful for trainees and hospital teams alike.

In day-to-day practice, the monitor is rarely “just a screen.” It sits at the end of a visualization chain that may include camera heads, light sources, processors, routing systems, recording platforms, and sometimes overlays from other devices (for example, ultrasound or fluorescence systems). Small differences—like input format, scaling behavior, picture presets, and brightness limits—can meaningfully affect how the surgical field appears and how comfortable it is to operate for long periods.

This is general information only; always follow your facility’s policies and the manufacturer’s instructions for use (IFU).

What is Surgical video monitor and why do we use it?

A Surgical video monitor is a medical-grade display optimized for the procedural environment. Its purpose is to show the procedural video feed clearly, with minimal delay (latency), consistent color and contrast, and sufficient brightness for the OR’s lighting conditions. In many setups, it also displays information overlays such as the selected input source, device status messages, or video system annotations. Some configurations integrate with OR video routing, recording, or tele-mentoring systems (capabilities vary by manufacturer).

In practice, Surgical video monitors are also chosen for reliability under continuous use. Procedure rooms may run for many hours per day, with repeated cleaning cycles and frequent movement of booms, carts, and cables. Durability and predictable performance over time are part of why facilities invest in dedicated clinical displays rather than relying on general-purpose screens.

Common clinical settings

You’ll typically find a Surgical video monitor in:

Operating rooms for minimally invasive surgery (MIS), including laparoscopic and thoracoscopic procedures
Endoscopy suites (gastroenterology, bronchoscopy)
Orthopedic arthroscopy rooms
Otolaryngology (ENT) and sinus endoscopy rooms
Urology endoscopy suites
Gynecology procedure rooms
Interventional radiology (IR) and hybrid ORs (when video sources are present)
Simulation labs and skills centers for training and debriefing

Additional settings where similar displays may be used include:

Robotic surgery rooms (for assistant viewing, room-wide display, or teaching screens, separate from the surgeon console)
Neurosurgery, plastic surgery, or ENT cases using exoscopes and “heads-up” digital visualization
Cardiac and vascular procedures that use endoscopic harvesting or camera-assisted techniques
Outpatient ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) where space constraints make monitor mounting and cable management especially important
Emergency departments or bedside procedure areas when portable endoscopy or video laryngoscopy systems are used (depending on local equipment availability and intended use)

Key benefits in patient care and workflow

A Surgical video monitor supports patient care and operations by enabling:

Shared visualization: multiple team members can view the same field, improving coordination and anticipation
Ergonomics: the primary surgeon can optimize posture and head/neck position by placing the screen appropriately
Teaching and supervision: trainees can follow anatomy and technique in real time; supervisors can point out landmarks and hazards
Standardization: consistent visual presentation across rooms can reduce “room-to-room variability” and cognitive load
Documentation and quality improvement: when integrated, the displayed feed may be recorded for education and review (policies vary by facility)

Depending on the workflow, additional benefits can include:

Faster troubleshooting: when multiple staff can see the same issue (fogging, smoke, wrong orientation), corrections can be made quickly
Task sharing: assistants and scrub staff can anticipate the next steps by following the video field rather than relying only on verbal cues
Safer instrument handoff and positioning: for MIS and arthroscopy, seeing instrument tips clearly reduces unintended tissue contact
Procedure consistency across teams: standardized monitor positioning and picture presets can reduce “personalized setups” that slow turnover

How it functions (plain-language signal chain)

While designs differ, the core idea is simple:

A camera (for example, at the tip of an endoscope) captures an image.
A video processor or control unit formats that signal (for example, adjusting exposure and color).
The signal travels through a cable (for example, SDI, HDMI, or DisplayPort—ports vary by manufacturer).
The Surgical video monitor receives the signal, scales it to the screen resolution, and displays it with selected picture settings.

The monitor itself does not “make a diagnosis.” It presents a video representation that clinicians interpret in context.

In real OR systems, there may be extra steps in the chain, such as:

A video switcher/router that selects which source goes to which monitor
A splitter/distribution amplifier that duplicates one output to multiple displays
A recorder/capture device that stores or streams the feed
An integration controller that applies labels, timestamps, or room-routing overlays

These extra components can improve flexibility but can also introduce new failure points, so teams benefit from knowing the “map” of their room’s video pathways.

How it differs from consumer displays (conceptually)

Hospitals often prefer purpose-built clinical device displays because they may offer:

Designs intended for frequent cleaning and disinfection
Mounting options for booms, carts, or walls and a form factor that suits sterile environments
Lower-latency processing modes intended for live procedural work
Stable brightness and wide viewing angles for team viewing
Connectivity options compatible with procedural video systems

Exact performance and features vary by manufacturer and model, and not all “medical-grade” monitors are intended for the same use (for example, surgical viewing vs. radiology diagnosis).

Other conceptual differences that often matter operationally include:

Electrical safety design expectations: medical environments may require specific leakage current limits and grounding approaches that are not typical priorities for consumer screens
Serviceability and lifecycle support: hospitals often need spare parts availability, documented maintenance pathways, and predictable repair turnaround
Mechanical integration: clinical mounts, sealed bezels, and cable strain relief are practical necessities when devices are moved, cleaned, and repositioned repeatedly
Consistency across devices: facilities may configure multiple rooms to behave the same way (input naming, default presets, button lockouts), reducing variation between teams and shifts

Typical technical characteristics you may encounter (non-exhaustive)

Specifications differ widely, but Surgical video monitors are commonly described and compared using features like:

Screen size: often chosen based on room size and viewing distance (for example, smaller displays for tight endoscopy rooms, larger for big ORs or wall displays)
Resolution: high-definition (HD) and ultra-high-definition (commonly called 4K) are common in modern systems; the monitor should match or appropriately scale the source
Brightness (luminance): higher brightness can help overcome OR lighting and reflections, but overly bright settings can wash out fine tissue texture
Viewing angle: wide viewing angles help assistants and staff see consistent contrast and color from different positions
Surface and coating: anti-glare coatings and protective front surfaces can reduce reflections and improve cleanability, but they can be damaged by abrasive cleaning
Inputs and formats: SDI variants (for longer runs and robust locking connectors), HDMI, DisplayPort, and sometimes legacy inputs; supported refresh rates and formats matter
Low-latency modes: reduce internal processing delays (helpful for fine motor work), sometimes at the expense of certain “enhancement” features
Picture presets: procedure-specific modes (endoscopy, laparoscopy, arthroscopy, fluorescence) intended to standardize appearance and reduce manual adjustments
Mounting standards: compatibility with common mounting patterns and booms; secure mounting matters as much as image quality
Environmental design: fanless or low-noise cooling, vent placement, and sealed front designs that tolerate frequent wipe-downs

In procurement and commissioning, teams may also discuss color depth (for example, 8-bit vs 10-bit), uniformity (consistent brightness across the screen), and whether the monitor supports rotation, picture-in-picture, or mirroring.

How medical students encounter it in training

Medical students and residents often first learn the “language of endoscopic vision” through the Surgical video monitor:

Orientation skills: translating a 2D screen view into 3D anatomy and instrument movement
Team communication: learning how surgeons reference structures (“at 2 o’clock,” “superior/inferior”) based on the screen
Workflow awareness: recognizing how equipment setup, cable routing, and monitor placement affect case efficiency
Safety mindset: appreciating that a clear image is not guaranteed—fog, smoke, blood, glare, wrong input selection, or poor settings can mislead

Many trainees also learn practical “visual literacy” skills such as:

Understanding how white balance and exposure affect tissue appearance
Recognizing when a problem is likely upstream (lens fogging, light source, insufflation) versus downstream (wrong input, scaling, brightness preset)
Developing habits like calling out “image flipped” or “camera horizon rotated” early, before disorientation becomes a safety risk
Appreciating that what looks “good” aesthetically is not always what is safest for precise dissection (for example, too much sharpness can create misleading edges)

When should I use Surgical video monitor (and when should I not)?

Use of a Surgical video monitor is usually straightforward: if your procedure uses a camera-based visualization system, you generally need a Surgical video monitor (or multiple monitors) to display the field to the team. The nuance is in where, how, and for what intended use the monitor is deployed.

Appropriate use cases

Common appropriate uses include:

Displaying the live feed from laparoscopic, endoscopic, or arthroscopic camera systems
Displaying microscope or exoscope video output when the optical view is shared digitally
Showing a secondary view for assistants, scrub staff, or trainees (for example, a second Surgical video monitor on a boom)
Supporting teaching, proctoring, and simulation debriefing when permitted by policy
Serving as part of an integrated OR video routing system (input selection and routing vary by manufacturer)

Additional appropriate use cases in many facilities include:

Multi-modality procedures: showing two sources side-by-side or via picture-in-picture (for example, endoscopy plus ultrasound), when supported and approved
Fluorescence imaging workflows: displaying pseudo-color overlays used in perfusion or lymphatic mapping, when the monitor and processor are compatible and configured correctly
Room awareness displays: large wall-mounted monitors that show the live surgical feed for circulating staff or for limited educational viewing (according to policy)
Procedure room standardization: using the same monitor family across rooms to reduce training burden and improve predictability during urgent cases

Situations where it may not be suitable

A Surgical video monitor may be not suitable or not sufficient when:

The environment is incompatible: for example, use near magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) requires MRI-conditional equipment; a standard Surgical video monitor may be unsafe or unusable there
The intended use is different: a surgical viewing monitor may not be intended for diagnostic radiology interpretation; intended use statements and local policy matter
The monitor’s condition is compromised: cracked screen, loose mount, damaged power cord, liquid ingress, or repeated signal dropouts
You cannot maintain safe setup: unstable carts, trip hazards, or positioning that blocks critical access to the patient or anesthesia workstation

Other practical “not suitable” scenarios can include:

Signal format incompatibility: if the source output format (resolution/refresh rate) is not supported, the monitor may show “out of range” or fail to display an image
Content protection/handshake issues: some interfaces negotiate capabilities on startup; mismatches can result in intermittent blanking until settings are corrected
Excessive reflection/glare that cannot be mitigated: in rare layouts, the best available placement still produces distracting reflections; this becomes a workflow and safety issue, not just comfort
Temporary non-clinical use: consumer displays might be fine for administrative presentations, but they are often not appropriate for live procedural visualization where cleaning, latency, and mounting safety matter

Safety cautions and “contraindication-style” reminders (general)

These are operational cautions rather than patient-specific medical contraindications:

Do not use a Surgical video monitor with visible damage, exposed wiring, or an unstable mounting arm.
Do not route cables across walkways without secured cable management.
Do not place the monitor where it obstructs emergency access to the patient, anesthesia equipment, oxygen, suction, or exit pathways.
Do not rely on the Surgical video monitor for physiologic monitoring unless it is explicitly configured as part of a validated patient-monitoring workflow (varies by facility).
Do not assume the image is “correct” without verification: wrong input source, flipped orientation, or incorrect settings can mislead.

Additional practical cautions many teams adopt include:

Avoid placing a monitor where it could be struck by moving booms, C-arms, or doorways during transport and positioning.
Avoid placing the display directly above the patient’s head/airway area unless the mount is specifically designed and maintained for that purpose and local policy allows.
Avoid frequent mid-case “picture tuning” unless a designated team member manages it; repeated changes can confuse the operator and disrupt the shared mental model.

Emphasize supervision and local protocols

Trainees should use the Surgical video monitor under appropriate supervision and within local protocols, including:

Pre-procedure “time-out” and laterality checks
Equipment readiness and room setup standards
Recording/streaming policies and patient privacy rules
Biomedical engineering (biomed) approval processes for new equipment or configuration changes

In addition, many facilities have local conventions that trainees should learn early, such as:

Which monitor is the “surgeon primary” versus assistant versus teaching display
Who is allowed to change input routing (circulator, integration specialist, or a designated “video lead”)
Whether certain presets are locked to avoid unapproved image manipulation
How patient identifiers are handled on the video overlay during routine care and during teaching sessions

What do I need before starting?

Successful use depends as much on operational readiness as on the screen itself. Before a case, think in four layers: environment, accessories, competencies, and governance.

Required setup, environment, and accessories

Common needs include:

Stable power: appropriate outlets for medical equipment; many ORs use isolated power systems and/or uninterruptible power supplies (UPS), depending on local design
Mounting or cart: wall mount, ceiling boom, or mobile cart rated for the monitor’s weight and intended movement
Video source equipment: camera control unit, endoscopy processor, surgical tower, or video routing system
Cables and adapters: SDI (Serial Digital Interface), HDMI (High-Definition Multimedia Interface), DisplayPort, or DVI connections; availability and compatibility vary by manufacturer
Optional integration components: video routers/switchers, recording systems, picture archiving or video management systems, network interfaces, foot controls, or remote controls (varies by manufacturer)
Lighting and glare control: monitor placement should account for overhead lights, reflections, and staff movement

Additional accessories and “small items that matter” often include:

Cable strain relief and securement: clips, ties, or purpose-built strain relief to reduce connector wear and intermittent dropouts
Spare, known-good cables: having a tested spare SDI/HDMI cable nearby can dramatically shorten downtime
Remote control or front-panel lock tools: some monitors allow locking buttons to prevent accidental changes; others use a remote or a keypad sequence
Cleaning-compatible protective covers: where permitted, disposable covers or protective films can reduce wear from frequent wipe-downs (must not impair ventilation or violate IFU)
Integration labeling: consistent labels on cables and inputs (for example, “Tower 1 SDI Out”) reduce wrong-source selection during turnover

Training and competency expectations

At a minimum, users should be competent to:

Power on/off correctly and select the right input source
Recognize “no signal,” wrong source, and common image problems (overexposure, low brightness, incorrect aspect ratio)
Position the monitor for ergonomics and teamwork without compromising sterile field boundaries
Perform basic safety checks and know when to call for help
Follow cleaning and disinfection requirements for high-touch surfaces

Facilities often differentiate competency by role (for example, circulating nurse vs. surgeon vs. anesthesia tech vs. biomed). Expectations vary by institution.

Some organizations also include “video fundamentals” in onboarding for OR staff, such as:

Basic understanding of resolution and format (for example, 1080p vs 2160p, 50/60 Hz)
Recognizing the difference between interlaced and progressive outputs when older devices are present
Understanding that aspect ratio errors (stretched images) can affect perception of anatomy and instrument distance
Knowing how to access or request a test pattern from the source processor (if available) to isolate monitor vs camera problems

Pre-use checks and documentation (practical)

A simple pre-use checklist often includes:

Physical integrity: screen intact, housing closed, vents unobstructed
Mount/cable safety: arm locks function, cart brakes work, cables secured and undamaged
Correct input path: confirm source device is connected and the right input is selected
Image sanity check: verify focus, brightness, and orientation; confirm the image matches the camera field
Preset selection: choose the appropriate picture mode for the procedure type (modes vary by manufacturer)
Asset readiness: confirm preventive maintenance (PM) label is current if your facility uses one; log issues per policy

Documentation practices vary. Some ORs document equipment checks in the nursing record; others use separate equipment logs.

For higher-complexity rooms, teams may add quick checks like:

Confirm that all expected monitors (surgeon, assistant, wall) display the same source when required
Confirm that routing labels match the actual source (especially after maintenance or room renovation)
Confirm the monitor is not stuck in an unintended mode (for example, picture-in-picture enabled from a prior case)
Check for obvious uniformity problems (large dark regions) that could indicate backlight aging or damage

Operational prerequisites: commissioning, maintenance, policies

Before a Surgical video monitor is deployed into clinical service, hospitals typically require:

Commissioning/acceptance testing: verification of basic function, electrical safety checks, and integration tests with video sources (methods vary by facility)
Preventive maintenance plan: cleaning checks, cable inspection, functional tests, and periodic electrical safety testing (frequency varies by policy and local regulation)
Spare parts and downtime planning: spare cables/adapters, backup monitor availability, and defined escalation paths
Information security review (if networked): if the monitor connects to a network or video management system, cybersecurity and access control should be addressed (varies by manufacturer and facility)
Standard operating procedures: setup standards, naming conventions for inputs, recording rules, and cleaning agents allowed

Some hospitals also add change-management practices such as:

Baseline configuration control: a documented “gold” configuration (default presets, locked settings, input names) that can be restored after service
Software/firmware update governance: updates are scheduled, tested, and documented to avoid unexpected behavior changes in the OR
Room certification after major changes: when booms, routers, or towers are replaced, teams may do an end-to-end verification that every source appears on every intended display

Roles and responsibilities (who does what?)

Clear role definitions reduce friction during cases:

Clinicians (surgeons, endoscopists): specify visualization needs, confirm image adequacy, and report performance concerns affecting clinical work
Nursing/OR staff: room setup, input selection, positioning, cable management, and basic troubleshooting during turnover
Biomedical engineering: device evaluation, commissioning, preventive maintenance, repairs, service coordination, and safety recalls/alerts handling
Procurement/supply chain: vendor selection, contract management, warranty/service terms, and lifecycle planning
IT/security (when applicable): network configuration, access control, and integration with recording or tele-mentoring systems

Other stakeholders commonly involved include:

Infection prevention/environmental services: approved disinfectants, cleaning workflows, and auditing of high-touch surface cleaning
Facilities/engineering: mounting infrastructure integrity (walls, ceilings, booms), power quality considerations, and renovation planning
OR integration specialists (where present): routing configuration, label standards, and staff training on integrated control systems

How do I use it correctly (basic operation)?

Exact steps vary by model and OR integration, but the workflow below covers common, transferable practices.

Basic step-by-step workflow (commonly applicable)

Confirm the plan: identify which Surgical video monitor will be used (primary vs. assistant vs. wall display).
Position safely: place the monitor to support the surgeon’s line of sight while keeping clear access to the patient and anesthesia area.
Secure the mount/cart: lock boom joints as needed; engage cart brakes; confirm stability.
Connect the video source: attach the appropriate cable from the video processor/camera control unit to the monitor input.
Power on: turn on the monitor and source equipment in the sequence recommended by local practice (sequence can matter for input “handshakes,” depending on interfaces).
Select input/source: use the on-screen display (OSD) or dedicated buttons to choose the correct input.
Verify the live image: confirm the camera is producing the expected view; check orientation (rotation/flip), focus, and exposure.
Choose the picture preset: select an appropriate mode (for example, endoscopy/laparoscopy preset), if available.
Adjust only as needed: set brightness/contrast to comfortable levels; avoid extreme “enhancement” unless you understand its effect.
Final positioning: adjust height, tilt, and rotation for ergonomics and team visibility.
During the case: monitor for image dropouts, overheating warnings, and accidental button presses; communicate changes to the team.
After the case: return settings if your facility standardizes them, power down per policy, and prepare for cleaning.

A practical workflow tip: if your room uses multiple monitors, confirm early whether they should show duplicated content (same view) or different sources (for example, surgeon view vs ultrasound). Confusion about “what should be on which screen” is a common cause of mid-case interruptions.

Ergonomic positioning guidelines (practical)

Ergonomics is not cosmetic—fatigue affects precision and attention. While exact recommendations vary, many teams aim for:

Neutral neck posture: place the monitor so the primary operator does not need prolonged neck flexion/extension or rotation
Minimal eye travel: keep the display within a comfortable forward viewing cone to reduce repeated head turning
Appropriate height and tilt: slight downward gaze is often more comfortable than looking upward for long periods
Alignment with hand movements: in MIS, aligning the monitor approximately in front of the surgeon can improve hand-eye coordination compared with having the screen far to the side
Clear assistant visibility: assistants should not need to lean into the sterile field to see the screen

Even a “perfect picture” becomes unsafe if the operator is forced into a strained posture for hours.

Calibration and setup considerations (general)

Some Surgical video monitor models support calibration features such as:

Color temperature or white point presets
Gamma settings (how mid-tones are displayed)
Sharpness/edge enhancement
Noise reduction
3D modes (if used with compatible camera systems)

Calibration practices vary by manufacturer and facility. In many hospitals, biomed or clinical engineering manages baseline configuration so each OR has consistent display behavior.

Additional setup considerations that often come up include:

Backlight aging: over time, maximum brightness can decrease; consistent baseline settings help teams notice drift rather than “chasing” it with manual tweaks
Uniformity: some displays have more even brightness across the screen than others; uneven illumination can be distracting during delicate work
Color consistency across multiple monitors: when the surgeon and assistant view different screens, mismatched color/brightness can create communication friction (“it looks bleeding to me” vs “it looks fine to me”)
Mode discipline: if your system includes specialty modes (for example, fluorescence), teams should agree on who can activate them and how to confirm they’re active

Typical settings and what they generally mean

Brightness/backlight: affects overall luminance; too low can hide detail, too high can wash out tissue texture.
Contrast: expands differences between light and dark areas; extreme contrast can obscure subtle gradients.
Sharpness: can make edges appear crisper but may introduce halos or “false edges.”
Color/tint: influences perceived tissue color; incorrect settings may mislead interpretation of perfusion or inflammation.
Aspect ratio/scaling: ensures the image is not stretched; mismatched settings can distort anatomy.
Low-latency mode: may reduce processing delay (availability varies by manufacturer).

A practical principle for trainees: adjust settings cautiously, document non-standard changes when required, and prefer standardized presets unless there is a clear operational reason to deviate.

Other settings you may encounter on some models include:

Black level: affects how deep “dark areas” look; incorrect black level can hide detail in shadowed regions
Dynamic contrast or “enhancement” modes: can make the image look vivid but may change tissue appearance unpredictably as the scene changes
Color space selection: in advanced systems, the monitor may support different color spaces; mismatches can cause dull or oversaturated appearance
OSD lockout: prevents accidental input switching or setting changes during a case

How do I keep the patient safe?

Even though a Surgical video monitor does not contact the patient directly, it can still affect safety through image reliability, environmental risks, and information handling. Patient safety here is about systems safety: the right image, at the right time, in a safe setup.

Safety practices during setup and use

Verify the correct source early: confirm the displayed image corresponds to the correct patient and correct procedure before the first critical step.
Confirm orientation and laterality: camera rotation and image flip settings can change “left/right” perception; use team verification practices and follow local protocols.
Plan for continuity: ensure a backup visualization plan exists (spare monitor, alternate input, or ability to switch to another display) to avoid delays during a critical moment.
Manage distractions: reduce accidental OSD pop-ups, unintended input switching, or remote-control misuse by assigning responsibility to a specific team member.

In rooms with recording or routing, an additional safety practice is to ensure the live feed is truly live (not a paused frame, playback, or a different room’s source). This matters most in integrated OR environments where multiple sources can be routed to multiple destinations.

Electrical and mechanical safety (high-yield)

Inspect power cords and plugs: frayed cables, loose connectors, or damaged insulation require removal from service.
Avoid liquid exposure: keep irrigation fluids and cleaning liquids away from vents and connectors; liquid ingress can create shock and fire hazards.
Use stable mounting: boom arms and wall mounts must be correctly rated and maintained; a falling monitor is a serious hazard to staff and patient.
Cable management: secure cables away from foot traffic and rolling equipment; prevent tension on connectors that can cause intermittent signal loss.
Ventilation: do not block vents with drapes or equipment; overheating can trigger shutdown or image instability.

Electrical safety expectations are often aligned with standards such as IEC 60601 for medical electrical equipment, but compliance and certification details are manufacturer-specific and not always publicly stated.

Additional environment-related considerations include:

Power quality: voltage fluctuations and poor grounding can contribute to unexpected resets or intermittent faults; facilities may mitigate with proper electrical design and maintenance
Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC): high-powered devices (for example, electrosurgery units) can contribute to interference in poorly shielded systems; correct cable types and routing reduce risk
Mechanical drift: boom arms that slowly sag can change the viewing angle mid-case; this is both an ergonomic problem and a distraction that can affect focus

Human factors and teamwork risks

Many real-world failures are “human factors” issues rather than hardware defects:

Wrong input selected when multiple sources are connected
Misinterpretation due to glare, reflections, or inappropriate picture settings
Unclear responsibility for who can change settings mid-case
Monitor positioned too high/low causing fatigue and reduced attention
Conflicting preferences between surgeons leading to inconsistent room setups

Mitigations include standardized room layouts, consistent naming of inputs, locked baseline presets, and structured troubleshooting roles.

Some teams also reduce risk by adopting simple norms, for example:

Only the circulator (or a designated “video lead”) touches monitor controls during the case
Any change to input or picture mode is announced out loud (“Switching to Source 2 now”)
Presets are returned to a standard baseline during turnover so the next team starts from a known state

Privacy, recording, and cybersecurity (when applicable)

If the Surgical video monitor is part of a system that records or transmits video:

Follow facility policy for consent, storage, and access control.
Ensure patient identifiers on overlays are handled appropriately (for example, avoid showing identifiers on teaching screens when not required).
Treat network-connected video systems as part of the clinical cybersecurity perimeter (policies vary by facility and region).

Practical privacy and cybersecurity considerations can include:

Whether the monitor or routing system supports user logins or role-based access
Whether USB ports or removable media are enabled/disabled per policy
How the system behaves after a power interruption (for example, does it return to a default source that could show another room’s feed?)
Whether remote viewing features (tele-mentoring) require additional consent and auditing

Incident reporting culture

Encourage reporting of:

Near-misses (for example, wrong input selected but caught before incision)
Repeat faults (intermittent signal loss, random shutdowns)
Mounting or cable hazards
Cleaning-related damage (clouding, coating degradation)

A “blame-free” reporting culture helps biomed and OR leadership fix systemic issues before harm occurs.

In some facilities, recurring visualization faults are reviewed in OR quality or morbidity-and-mortality-adjacent meetings—not to assign blame, but to identify patterns (for example, one room’s boom causing repeated cable strain, or one cleaning agent degrading coatings faster than expected).

How do I interpret the output?

The Surgical video monitor output is typically live video, sometimes combined with overlays. Interpretation is clinical and contextual: the team uses the displayed image to guide maneuvers, recognize anatomy, and assess procedural progress. The monitor is only as reliable as the entire video chain (camera, processor, cables, routing, and settings).

Types of outputs you might see

Live endoscopic/arthroscopic/laparoscopic feed (primary use)
Picture-in-picture (PiP): two sources at once (for example, endoscopy plus ultrasound), if supported
On-screen status messages: “No signal,” input name, resolution, temperature warnings (varies by manufacturer)
Optional informational overlays: timestamps, device settings, or routing labels (varies by integration)

You may also see, depending on the specialty and platform:

Fluorescence overlays or dual images: pseudo-color highlighting, split-screen visible/fluorescence views, or blended modes
Device parameter overlays: insufflation pressure/flow, pump settings, camera gain, or white balance status (implementation varies widely)
Teaching annotations: arrows, circles, or freeze frames used in training environments (usually governed by policy)

How clinicians typically interpret what they see

Anatomical navigation: identifying landmarks, planes, and safe zones
Instrument awareness: tracking instrument tips and energy device activation visually
Field quality: recognizing smoke, fogging, blood, and fluid that limit visibility
Team communication: aligning verbal directions to what is on the screen (“move superior,” “rotate camera clockwise”)

Trainees often benefit from explicitly learning the visual cues that replace “direct depth” in 2D systems, such as:

Relative motion (camera movement vs instrument movement)
Shading and tissue texture gradients
Known instrument size as an informal “scale reference”
The importance of maintaining a stable camera horizon to reduce disorientation

Common pitfalls and limitations

Artifacts from the camera or lens: fogging, droplets, smearing, and glare can mimic pathology or obscure detail.
Processing “enhancements”: sharpness and contrast boosts can create false edges or exaggerate textures.
Color shift: incorrect white balance or color presets can change tissue appearance; clinical correlation is essential.
Latency: even small delays can affect hand-eye coordination during fine movements; perceived latency depends on the full system, not just the monitor.
Scaling/aspect mismatch: stretched images can distort anatomy and distances.

When the image does not match the expected anatomy or procedural feel, pause and troubleshoot systematically rather than “working through” uncertainty.

A useful mental model is to ask: is this a field problem (smoke, blood, fogging), a camera problem (focus, white balance, sensor), a processing problem (wrong preset/mode), a routing problem (wrong source), or a display problem (brightness, scaling, failure)? This keeps troubleshooting organized under time pressure.

What if something goes wrong?

When issues occur, priorities are: (1) keep the procedure safe, (2) stabilize visualization, (3) document and escalate appropriately. Many problems are simple (wrong input, loose cable), but some indicate equipment that should be removed from service.

Quick troubleshooting checklist (OR-friendly)

Confirm the patient is safe and the procedural step can pause safely (clinical judgment required).
Check for obvious messages: “No signal,” “Out of range,” overheating warnings (wording varies by manufacturer).
Verify power: monitor on, power indicator lit, outlet powered, no tripped breaker on the cart/boom (if present).
Verify the correct input is selected on the Surgical video monitor.
Reseat the video cable at both ends; check for bent pins or damaged connectors.
Switch to a known-good cable or alternate input path if available.
Confirm the source device is outputting video (camera control unit/processor on, camera connected).
Restore a standard picture preset if settings were changed.
If the image is present but poor, check the upstream causes: camera focus, lens fogging, fluid on lens, smoke evacuation.
If integrated routing is used, confirm the router/switcher source selection and labeling.

Additional high-yield troubleshooting steps that often save time:

If the monitor says “Out of range,” check the source output format; switching the processor output to a common format (often a standard HD or UHD setting used in your facility) may restore the image.
If only one of multiple monitors is failing, swap the inputs (or outputs) to determine whether the fault follows the monitor or the source/cable.
If the source device provides a test pattern, enable it briefly: if the test pattern displays correctly, the monitor and cable path are likely functioning and the issue may be camera-side.
Check whether the monitor is in an unintended state such as PiP enabled, freeze, or brightness turned down due to a user profile or power-saving mode (features vary).

When to stop use (remove from service)

Stop using the Surgical video monitor and escalate if you observe:

Electrical burning smell, smoke, sparks, or unusual heat
Fluid ingress into the housing or connectors
Repeated shutdowns, flickering that cannot be stabilized, or persistent black screen during critical steps
Loose mount, drifting boom arm, or instability that could lead to a fall
Cracked screen or exposed internal components

In these situations, switch to a backup display if available and follow local safety procedures.

When to escalate (biomed, IT, or manufacturer)

Escalate to biomedical engineering when:

The problem recurs across cases or rooms
There are signs of hardware failure (backlight issues, lines on screen, persistent color distortion)
Mounting, cable, or electrical safety issues are suspected
A firmware/software update is required (if applicable)

Escalate to IT/security teams when:

Network-connected features fail (streaming, routing control, recording access)
User accounts, access controls, or audit logs are involved (capabilities vary)

A practical escalation tip: capture the exact on-screen error message and the current input/resolution shown in the OSD, if available. These details can significantly speed up support and reduce repeated troubleshooting questions.

Documentation and reporting expectations (general)

Record:

Room and asset identification (asset tag/serial if available)
What happened, when, and under what setup (input type, source device)
Any error messages displayed
Steps taken and whether a backup device was used
Whether patient care was delayed or altered (reporting pathways vary by facility)

Follow local incident reporting policies and manufacturer reporting requirements as applicable.

Infection control and cleaning of Surgical video monitor

A Surgical video monitor is typically a non-sterile, high-touch surface used in a high-risk environment. It can contribute to cross-contamination if not cleaned consistently. Cleaning is also a device longevity issue: incompatible chemicals or methods can damage screen coatings and seals.

Cleaning principles (practical and safe)

Clean then disinfect: remove visible soil first; disinfectants work best on clean surfaces.
Use approved products: follow the manufacturer’s IFU for compatible detergents and disinfectants; facility infection prevention policy also applies.
Avoid liquid ingress: do not spray liquids directly onto the screen or vents; use dampened wipes or cloths as permitted.
Protect the screen: use non-abrasive materials; avoid scratching anti-glare coatings.
Respect contact time: disinfectants often require the surface to remain wet for a defined period; the product label and facility policy guide this.

Because monitors are cleaned frequently, small deviations from best practice can accumulate into big problems (clouding, peeling coatings, sticky buttons, compromised seals). If a monitor starts to look hazy or develops “permanent smears,” it may indicate chemical incompatibility or overly abrasive wiping rather than simple dirt.

Disinfection vs. sterilization (general)

Sterilization is intended to eliminate all microbial life, including spores; it is not typically applicable to monitors.
Disinfection reduces microbial load; the level (low/intermediate/high) depends on product and policy.
Most Surgical video monitor cleaning is cleaning plus low- or intermediate-level disinfection, but practices vary by facility and regional guidelines.

High-touch points to prioritize

Buttons, joystick controls, and on-screen display control panels
Bezel edges and corners where debris accumulates
Handles, cart rails, and boom arm grips
Cable surfaces near the monitor and connectors (if handled during cases)
Remote control devices (if used)

A useful practice is to think about who touches what: the circulator may touch the side controls repeatedly, while anesthesia staff may handle cart rails during repositioning. High-touch zones differ by room layout.

Example cleaning workflow (non-brand-specific)

Prepare: perform hand hygiene; don appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) per facility policy.
Power down safely: turn off the Surgical video monitor and allow it to cool if warm; unplug if required by policy.
Remove gross contamination: wipe with an approved cleaning agent to remove visible soil.
Disinfect: use an approved disinfectant wipe/solution; ensure the surface remains wet for required contact time.
Avoid pooling: keep liquids away from vents, seams, and ports; do not allow drips into connectors.
Dry and inspect: allow to air dry or wipe dry if the product allows; check for residue, streaking, or damage.
Document as required: some facilities require turnover cleaning documentation for high-touch equipment.

When in doubt, default to the manufacturer IFU and your infection prevention team’s guidance.

Many hospitals also distinguish between:

Between-case cleaning: rapid wipe-down of high-touch areas and visible soil
End-of-day or terminal cleaning: more thorough cleaning of mounts, cart surfaces, and cable runs
Isolation-room or high-risk-case protocols: enhanced cleaning steps as directed by infection prevention

Medical Device Companies & OEMs

In procurement conversations, it helps to separate manufacturer from OEM.

A manufacturer is the company that markets the finished medical equipment and is typically responsible for regulatory documentation, quality management, warranty terms, and service pathways (responsibilities vary by region and agreement).
An OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) may produce components (for example, display panels, power supplies, mounting hardware) or may build a complete unit that is rebranded and sold by another company.

Why OEM relationships matter operationally

OEM arrangements can affect:

Parts availability and repair turnaround time
Consistency of firmware/software support across “similar” looking models
Who provides field service (the brand, a third party, or the OEM)
Long-term compatibility with video processors and routing systems
Total cost of ownership (service contracts, spares, and lifecycle refresh)

In addition, OEM relationships may influence whether accessories (mounts, cables, protective covers) remain available over the full life of the monitor. From an operations standpoint, a display that performs well but cannot be supported locally can become a downtime risk.

Top 5 World Best Medical Device Companies / Manufacturers

Example industry leaders (not a ranking); portfolios and availability vary by country:

Stryker: Known for a broad surgical technology portfolio that can include endoscopy visualization systems, OR integration components, and related hospital equipment. Many facilities evaluate the Surgical video monitor as part of a wider “video chain,” not as a standalone screen. Global presence and service models vary by region and contract structure. In integrated OR projects, selection may consider how well the display works with routing, recording, and standardized room layouts.
Olympus: Widely associated with endoscopy platforms and procedure-room ecosystems. In many hospitals, the Surgical video monitor is bundled with endoscopy towers and processors, influencing standardization choices. Product ranges and service coverage vary by market. For endoscopy-heavy hospitals, compatibility with processor output formats and specialty imaging modes is a practical buying factor.
KARL STORZ: Often recognized for endoscopy and minimally invasive surgery equipment, including visualization and camera systems that may pair with dedicated displays. Hospitals may consider compatibility with existing Storz towers and accessories. Availability and configurations vary by manufacturer and local distributor. In some sites, standardizing displays around existing camera systems simplifies training and troubleshooting.
Sony: Active in professional and medical imaging displays in many regions, with experience in high-performance video technologies. In healthcare, procurement teams may assess image quality, latency, and cleaning suitability alongside service support. Medical product lines and intended use claims vary by model. Facilities may also compare how well different models maintain consistency across multiple displays in the same room.
Barco: Known for professional visualization and medical display solutions in multiple clinical contexts. Hospital stakeholders often focus on display management, calibration approaches, and integration into multi-display OR setups. Specific surgical features and support offerings vary by region. In multi-monitor rooms, consistent brightness and color matching between displays can be a key operational advantage.

Other companies also participate in surgical display markets in different regions, and many hospitals purchase displays as part of a larger visualization or OR integration package rather than as a standalone component.

Vendors, Suppliers, and Distributors

These terms are often used interchangeably, but they can describe different roles in the purchasing chain:

A vendor is the entity selling the product to the hospital (this may be the manufacturer, a reseller, or a local representative).
A supplier is a broader term for organizations providing goods/services, including consumables, spares, accessories, and service coverage.
A distributor typically holds inventory and handles logistics, local compliance paperwork, installation coordination, and first-line support.

In many countries, the distributor is also the service gateway for warranty claims, loaner equipment, and spare parts.

From a hospital operations viewpoint, vendor capability is often judged by “day 2 support,” not just delivery. That includes installation quality, staff training, availability of backup units, and how quickly common spare parts (cables, power supplies, mounts) can be provided.

Top 5 World Best Vendors / Suppliers / Distributors

Example global distributors (not a ranking); actual availability for Surgical video monitor products varies widely by country and contracts:

McKesson: A major healthcare distribution organization with a strong footprint in North America. Hospitals may interact with such companies for broad supply chain services, though specific surgical visualization items often go through specialized channels. Service offerings and product access vary by agreement.
Cardinal Health: Operates large-scale healthcare supply and logistics networks, primarily in the United States and selected other markets. Health systems may use these distribution capabilities for standardized purchasing and inventory support. Surgical video infrastructure is often sourced through a mix of distributors and specialized integrators.
Medline Industries: Supplies a wide range of hospital products in multiple regions. Facilities may engage Medline for supply chain efficiency and standardization, though specialized capital equipment procurement may still require manufacturer-authorized pathways. Coverage varies by country.
Henry Schein: Known for distribution in healthcare, including clinics and outpatient settings in many markets. Depending on region, hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers may encounter Henry Schein as a procurement partner for selected equipment categories. Product portfolios differ by geography.
DKSH: A market expansion and distribution company with strong presence in parts of Asia and other regions. Health systems may rely on such distributors for importation support, local regulatory handling, and service coordination. Availability depends on local partnerships.

Global Market Snapshot by Country

India

Demand for Surgical video monitor systems is strongly influenced by growth in minimally invasive surgery, expanding private hospital networks, and increasing training programs in tertiary centers. Many facilities rely on imported components or fully imported systems, while local assembly and value-focused offerings may be present. Service capacity is often strongest in major cities, with more limited support in smaller towns.

In procurement, Indian hospitals commonly weigh upfront cost against long-term support, especially when monitors are deployed across many rooms. Compatibility with existing towers, availability of spare cables, and responsiveness of local service engineers can be decisive factors.

China

China has a large and diverse hospital equipment ecosystem, with both domestic manufacturing and imported brands competing across price tiers. Surgical video monitor adoption is tied to modernization of operating rooms and endoscopy suites, including integrated “digital OR” initiatives in higher-tier hospitals. Service networks are typically denser in urban centers, with variability in rural access and standardization.

Hospitals may also consider national and provincial procurement approaches, training support, and how well systems integrate with local video management or hospital information workflows.

United States

The U.S. market emphasizes integration, standardization, and lifecycle replacement planning across multi-room OR platforms. Surgical video monitor procurement is often linked to endoscopy tower upgrades, OR integration projects, and cybersecurity or IT governance when recording/streaming is involved. A mature service ecosystem exists, but hospitals may face complexity from multi-vendor environments and contract structures.

Value analysis committees frequently assess total cost of ownership, including service contracts, replacement cycles, and the impact of downtime on OR utilization.

Indonesia

Indonesia’s demand is shaped by expanding surgical capacity in major urban hospitals and a growing private sector, alongside geographic challenges across an archipelago. Surgical video monitor access outside large cities can be limited by logistics, service coverage, and spare parts availability. Import dependence is common, with procurement often routed through local distributors.

Because of regional variability, hospitals may prioritize robust packaging, clear training materials, and predictable service response times for remote sites.

Pakistan

In Pakistan, tertiary care hospitals in major cities drive most demand for advanced surgical visualization, including Surgical video monitor upgrades tied to minimally invasive surgery expansion. Import dependence is common, and after-sales support can vary depending on distributor strength and parts access. Resource constraints may lead facilities to prioritize durability, serviceability, and total cost of ownership.

Facilities often favor solutions that can be maintained with locally available spares and that tolerate variable power quality and environmental conditions.

Nigeria

Nigeria’s market is influenced by a mix of private hospitals, teaching institutions, and targeted investments in surgical capacity. Surgical video monitor procurement can be sensitive to power quality, environmental heat/dust, and service availability, making maintenance planning critical. Access is typically better in large urban centers than in rural areas.

Backup power planning and strong distributor support can be especially important to protect uptime in busy operating schedules.

Brazil

Brazil has a large healthcare system with both public and private demand for minimally invasive procedures and endoscopy services. Surgical video monitor purchasing often depends on tender processes, distributor networks, and service contract availability. Urban centers generally have stronger technical support ecosystems than remote regions.

Hospitals may also weigh whether to standardize platforms across multiple sites to simplify training and reduce spare parts complexity.

Bangladesh

Bangladesh’s demand is growing in higher-volume urban hospitals and private facilities expanding endoscopy and laparoscopic services. Many Surgical video monitor systems are imported, and hospitals may evaluate availability of local service engineers and spare parts before committing to a platform. Rural access remains constrained by infrastructure and staffing.

Training support and reliable turnaround times for repairs can be key for facilities with high case volume and limited redundancy.

Russia

Russia’s Surgical video monitor market is shaped by hospital modernization needs and local procurement frameworks, with varying access to imported brands depending on supply conditions and regulations. Facilities often emphasize serviceability, parts availability, and compatibility with existing video towers. Advanced service support is more concentrated in major cities.

In some settings, extending the life of installed systems through maintenance and selective upgrades (for example, replacing displays while keeping processors) is a practical strategy.

Mexico

Mexico’s demand is driven by public sector hospitals, social security systems, and a large private sector that supports minimally invasive surgery and endoscopy growth. Proximity to North American supply chains can help with certain equipment categories, though local distributor capability remains central to service and warranty support. Access and standardization vary between urban and rural settings.

Hospitals often evaluate whether displays support the same video formats used across multiple towers to minimize adapter and conversion complexity.

Ethiopia

Ethiopia’s market is influenced by expanding surgical access initiatives, investments in tertiary centers, and, in some cases, donor-supported procurement. Surgical video monitor availability may be limited by import processes, biomedical workforce constraints, and spare parts logistics. Urban referral hospitals typically have stronger support than rural facilities.

A common operational focus is building local biomedical capacity to maintain systems and reduce dependency on long-distance service visits.

Japan

Japan’s procedural environment often favors high reliability, strong quality processes, and well-established service expectations for hospital equipment. Surgical video monitor adoption is integrated with advanced endoscopy and surgical platforms, and hospitals may prioritize long-term support and consistent performance. Access is generally strong, though procurement decisions can be highly specification-driven.

Hospitals may also emphasize consistency across rooms to support efficient staffing and predictable performance for high-volume endoscopy services.

Philippines

The Philippines has mixed public and private sector demand, with higher adoption of Surgical video monitor technology in major metropolitan hospitals and private centers. Geographic dispersion across islands can complicate installation, preventive maintenance, and repair logistics. Import dependence is common, making distributor service coverage a key differentiator.

Facilities may value training packages and accessible spare parts that reduce downtime in busy urban centers and remote provincial hospitals.

Egypt

Egypt’s demand is supported by large public hospitals, university centers, and a sizable private healthcare sector investing in minimally invasive services. Surgical video monitor procurement often depends on tendering and distributor partnerships, with attention to training and maintenance capacity. Urban centers have more robust service ecosystems than rural areas.

Hospitals may also consider the availability of multiple vendors for competitive bidding and the ability to maintain consistent room configurations for training institutions.

Democratic Republic of the Congo

Access to Surgical video monitor systems in the Democratic Republic of the Congo is often constrained by infrastructure limitations, funding variability, and shortages of trained technical staff. Facilities may rely on donor programs or targeted investments for advanced surgical equipment. Service and spare parts availability can be challenging outside major cities.

Projects that include training for local technicians and planned spare parts kits tend to be more sustainable over time.

Vietnam

Vietnam’s market is shaped by expanding hospital infrastructure, growth of private healthcare, and increasing demand for endoscopy and minimally invasive surgery. Surgical video monitor systems are frequently imported, with local distributors playing a major role in installation and maintenance. Urban hospitals generally have better access to service and training than rural regions.

Standardization within hospital networks and the availability of local training can influence purchasing decisions, particularly for growing private chains.

Iran

Iran has a mixed ecosystem that can include domestic manufacturing and local engineering capacity alongside imported technologies, influenced by supply constraints and regulatory pathways. Surgical video monitor procurement decisions often weigh serviceability, parts availability, and compatibility with existing towers. Technical expertise may be strong in major centers, with variable access elsewhere.

Facilities may prioritize solutions that can be maintained with local engineering resources and that do not rely on hard-to-source proprietary components.

Turkey

Turkey’s demand reflects a large hospital network, growth in minimally invasive surgery, and medical tourism in some cities. Surgical video monitor procurement may be linked to broader OR modernization and integration projects, supported by an active distributor and service market. Access and standardization are typically stronger in urban regions.

Hospitals serving international patients may also emphasize modern visualization capabilities and consistent imaging quality across multiple rooms.

Germany

Germany’s market is shaped by strong quality expectations, structured procurement, and emphasis on safety, documentation, and integration within hospital workflows. Surgical video monitor selection often includes attention to compatibility, service support, cleaning durability, and lifecycle planning. Service infrastructure is generally robust, supporting consistent preventive maintenance.

Standardization and documentation requirements can drive interest in predictable calibration approaches and controlled configuration management.

Thailand

Thailand’s demand is influenced by a combination of public investment and a strong private hospital sector, including facilities serving medical tourism. Surgical video monitor adoption is common in major urban centers where minimally invasive services are concentrated. Import dependence is typical, and distributor-led service capability is central to uptime outside Bangkok and other large cities.

Hospitals may also focus on training support for staff turnover and consistent performance across multi-room surgical centers.

United Kingdom

In the United Kingdom, demand is shaped by both public-sector procurement frameworks and private-sector investment. Many facilities emphasize standardization across sites, clear maintenance pathways, and documented cleaning compatibility due to high equipment utilization. Surgical video monitors are often evaluated as part of endoscopy suite upgrades and operating theatre modernization, with attention to integration and service-level commitments.

Saudi Arabia

Saudi Arabia’s market includes significant investment in healthcare infrastructure expansion and modernization of surgical and endoscopy services. Hospitals may prioritize large integrated projects that bundle monitors with towers, routing, and recording, and they often expect comprehensive training and strong service response times. Standardization across newly built facilities and large health systems can drive higher-volume purchasing decisions.

South Africa

South Africa has a dual healthcare landscape, with private hospitals often adopting newer minimally invasive and endoscopy technologies earlier than some public facilities. Procurement considerations frequently include durability, local service coverage, and the ability to maintain uptime despite variable infrastructure constraints in some areas. Regional distributor strength and access to trained biomedical engineers can strongly influence platform selection.

Australia

Australia’s demand spans highly advanced urban centers and remote regional facilities. Geographic distance can make installation and servicing logistics a major factor, so hospitals may value robust warranty terms, readily available spare parts, and remote troubleshooting support. Surgical video monitor procurement often emphasizes reliability, compatibility with existing visualization towers, and cleaning durability given frequent use.

Canada

Canada’s market often involves provincial or network-based procurement, with an emphasis on value, standardization, and long-term support. Many hospitals consider service coverage outside major metropolitan areas, bilingual documentation needs in some settings, and integration with existing OR infrastructure. As in the United States, cybersecurity governance can be a consideration when video recording or network routing is included.

Key Takeaways and Practical Checklist for Surgical video monitor

Confirm the Surgical video monitor intended use matches your procedure and policy.
Check the manufacturer IFU before changing presets or cleaning methods.
Inspect the screen, housing, vents, and connectors for visible damage.
Verify the mount or cart is rated, stable, and locked before the case.
Engage cart brakes and confirm boom arm joints hold position.
Route cables away from walkways and secure them to prevent trips.
Avoid cable tension at connectors to reduce intermittent signal loss.
Power on the source and monitor in a consistent sequence.
Select the correct input source and confirm the live image early.
Confirm image orientation and laterality with the surgical team.
Use standardized picture presets when available to reduce variability.
Avoid extreme sharpness and contrast settings that can mislead.
Treat unexpected color shifts as a safety concern, not a preference.
Watch for glare and reflections from OR lights and reposition as needed.
Position the monitor to support neutral neck posture for the operator.
Ensure assistants and scrub staff have an adequate viewing angle.
Keep the monitor clear of sterile field boundaries unless policy allows.
Do not block monitor vents with drapes or equipment.
Keep irrigation fluids and wet items away from power and ports.
Respond to “no signal” or overheating messages immediately.
Have a backup visualization plan for critical steps (spare monitor/cable).
Assign one person to manage input switching and settings during the case.
If recording/streaming is used, follow consent and privacy policy.
Minimize patient identifiers on teaching displays when not required.
Document recurring faults with time, room, source, and error messages.
Remove from service if there is smoke, burning smell, or liquid ingress.
Escalate mounting drift, cracked screens, or electrical concerns to biomed.
Keep spare compatible cables/adapters accessible for rapid swaps.
Standardize input labeling to reduce wrong-source selection.
Use cleaning agents approved by infection prevention and the IFU.
Clean then disinfect; do not disinfect over visible soil.
Never spray liquids directly onto the screen or ventilation openings.
Focus cleaning on high-touch controls, bezel edges, and handles.
Allow required disinfectant contact time; avoid wiping it dry too early.
Inspect for residue or coating damage after repeated cleaning cycles.
Train new staff on setup, source selection, and basic troubleshooting.
Include the Surgical video monitor in preventive maintenance schedules.
Review downtime events in OR quality meetings to identify patterns.
Consider total cost of ownership, not only purchase price, in procurement.
Confirm local service coverage and spare parts pathways before purchase.
Validate compatibility with existing camera processors and routing systems.
Standardize across rooms when possible to reduce training burden.
Treat image quality as a patient-safety input, not an aesthetic detail.

Additional practical “small checks” that prevent big delays:

Confirm the displayed resolution/format is the expected one for your room standard (when the OSD shows it).
If available, use button/OSD lockout to prevent accidental mid-case switching.
Learn where your source device’s test pattern is located (if supported) to quickly isolate camera vs monitor faults.
For specialty imaging modes (for example, fluorescence or 3D), confirm the correct mode is active on both the processor and the monitor before critical steps.

If you are looking for contributions and suggestion for this content please drop an email to contact@myhospitalnow.com

Find Trusted Cardiac Hospitals

Compare heart hospitals by city and services — all in one place.

Explore Hospitals

Ready for a New You? Start with the Right Hospital.