Catheter securement device: Overview, Uses and Top Manufacturer Company

H2: Introduction

A Catheter securement device is a medical device designed to stabilize a catheter at the skin level and help prevent unintended movement, migration, kinking, or dislodgement. Catheters are among the most common pieces of hospital equipment used in modern care—supporting intravenous (IV) therapy, hemodynamic monitoring, urinary drainage, and other essential clinical workflows. Because catheters interface directly with the patient’s skin and soft tissue, small failures in securement can lead to outsized consequences: therapy interruption, repeated cannulation, skin injury, unplanned line replacement, and avoidable staff workload.

For medical students and trainees, Catheter securement device use sits at the intersection of procedural skills (line placement and dressing), infection prevention, and safe patient handling. For hospital administrators, procurement teams, and biomedical engineers, it is also a product standardization and quality-management issue—touching supply chain continuity, staff training, adverse event reporting, and cost-of-care drivers.

This article explains what Catheter securement device products are, when they are typically used (and when they may not be suitable), how they are operated in a basic, non-brand-specific way, and how teams can think about safety, troubleshooting, cleaning, and the global market landscape—without providing medical advice.

H2: What is Catheter securement device and why do we use it?

Definition and purpose (plain language)

A Catheter securement device is a clinical device that anchors a catheter and/or its hub (the external connection point) to the patient’s skin. Its core purpose is mechanical stabilization:

• Reduce “pull” on the insertion site when tubing is moved.
• Limit catheter “pistoning” (in-and-out micro-motion).
• Help maintain dressing integrity around the insertion site.
• Organize tubing to reduce snagging during care, transport, or patient movement.

Catheter securement can be achieved with tape alone, but engineered securement products are designed to distribute forces over a wider surface area and to provide a repeatable, standardized method of stabilization.

Common clinical settings where it appears

You will encounter Catheter securement device products across many settings:

• Emergency department (rapid IV access, frequent patient transfers)
• Intensive care unit (ICU) (multiple lines, high monitoring intensity)
• Operating room and procedural areas (position changes, draping, sterile fields)
• Oncology and infusion centers (longer-duration therapies)
• Neonatal and pediatric units (smaller anatomy, high dislodgement risk)
• Dialysis and interventional radiology (line management during procedures)
• Home care and ambulatory care (fewer staff touches, need for durability)

They may be used with different catheter types, such as:

• Peripheral IV catheter (PIVC): a short cannula in a peripheral vein
• Midline catheter: longer than a PIVC, typically used for intermediate-duration therapy
• Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC): a central line inserted from a peripheral vein
• Central venous catheter (CVC): a central line placed in a large central vein
• Arterial line: used for invasive blood pressure monitoring and blood sampling
• Urinary catheter stabilization systems (for indwelling catheters), depending on facility practice

Key benefits (clinical and operational)

A Catheter securement device is typically intended to support:

• Patient safety: fewer accidental pulls and unplanned removals; less line manipulation.
• Patient comfort: reduced tugging sensation and better tubing management.
• Workflow reliability: fewer interruptions to infusions, monitoring, and transport.
• Standardization: consistent application across staff and shifts, which can simplify training and auditing.
• Sharps risk reduction (in some contexts): sutureless securement methods can reduce reliance on sutures for catheter stabilization, depending on catheter type and local practice.

Clinical outcomes (for example, complication rates) depend on many factors—patient condition, insertion technique, dressing protocol, and site care—so any benefit claims should be interpreted within local evidence and manufacturer guidance.

How it works (general mechanism)

While designs vary by manufacturer, many products share common elements:

• Skin-contact base: usually an adhesive pad or platform that adheres to skin.
• Retention feature: a clip, clamp, strap, or locking mechanism that holds the catheter hub or tubing.
• Force distribution: the device spreads load across the adhesive footprint to reduce localized shear at the insertion site.
• Tubing pathway management: built-in channels or anchor points reduce slack and snagging.

Some securement systems are fully adhesive-based; others include additional stabilization structures. Some specialized designs use a subcutaneous component (placed under the skin) for longer-term stabilization; suitability and procedural steps for those systems vary by manufacturer and local protocol.

How medical students typically learn this device

In training, Catheter securement device use commonly shows up in:

• Skills labs and simulation (IV insertion, dressing, and “line care” stations)
• Clinical rotations with vascular access teams or IV therapy nurses
• Central line insertion bundles and checklists (observation and assisting)
• OSCE-style assessments emphasizing aseptic technique and documentation

Students are often taught to think of securement as part of a “whole system”: catheter selection, insertion technique, dressing integrity, tubing management, patient mobility, and routine inspection.

H2: When should I use Catheter securement device (and when should I not)?

Appropriate use cases (general)

Catheter stabilization is relevant whenever a catheter is expected to remain in place and function reliably. A Catheter securement device is commonly considered when:

• The catheter is expected to dwell beyond a brief encounter (hours to days or longer).
• The patient is frequently moved (imaging, operating room, transfers, transport).
• The insertion site is at higher risk of mechanical stress (near joints, active limbs).
• The therapy requires stable flow (continuous infusion, irritant/vesicant infusions per protocol).
• The catheter is high-consequence if dislodged (certain central lines, arterial lines).
• The patient is at higher risk of pulling at lines (confusion, agitation, pediatrics), where appropriate safeguards and supervision are in place.

In many facilities, securement method is standardized by catheter type (for example, specific devices for PICCs vs PIVCs) to reduce variation and make training easier.

Situations where it may not be suitable

A Catheter securement device may be less suitable—or may require an alternative approach—when:

• Skin integrity is compromised: fragile skin, dermatitis, burns, open wounds, or significant edema near the site.
• Adhesive intolerance is suspected: history of adhesive sensitivity or significant prior skin injury with adhesives.
• Excess moisture or hair interferes with adhesion: heavy perspiration, oily skin, or dense hair (local protocol may address hair management).
• Anatomy or catheter configuration is incompatible: device size, hub shape, or tubing routing does not match the catheter set being used.
• The securement method would obscure assessment: if the design blocks visualization that your facility considers essential for inspection.

Some securement systems have additional considerations (for example, products with subcutaneous components). Suitability, insertion/removal steps, and contraindications vary by manufacturer and should be reviewed in the Instructions for Use (IFU).

Safety cautions and contraindications (general, non-clinical)

Because this is informational content (not medical advice), the safest way to frame cautions is by principles:

• Do not use a product if sterile packaging is compromised or expired.
• Do not reuse single-use components.
• Avoid configurations that kink tubing, compress a vessel, or create constant traction.
• Avoid applying adhesive over actively inflamed or visibly infected skin (follow local protocol).
• Confirm the product materials (for example, latex status) according to labeling; availability varies by manufacturer.
• Maintain appropriate aseptic technique during catheter and dressing care.

Emphasize clinical judgment and supervision

Securement choices should be made under supervision and according to local policy, especially for central access and high-risk patients. Many institutions have vascular access, IV therapy, or infection prevention teams who define standard products, dressing change intervals, and acceptable alternatives when the preferred device cannot be used.

H2: What do I need before starting?

Required environment, setup, and accessories

A Catheter securement device is typically part of a broader “catheter care” setup rather than standalone medical equipment. Common prerequisites include:

• Hand hygiene supplies and appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE)
• Skin antiseptic and sterile supplies per facility protocol (product choice varies)
• The correct securement device type and size for the catheter
• Dressing materials (often a transparent film dressing; may be integrated)
• Tubing management items (extension set, clamps, caps, labels), as applicable
• Skin barrier film and/or adhesive remover (if used in your facility)
• A clean working surface and adequate lighting to inspect the site

For some catheter types, additional accessories (such as antimicrobial dressings) may be used based on local policy.

Training and competency expectations

Even though securement products can look simple, consistent safe use usually depends on competency in:

• Skin assessment and recognition of early skin injury
• Aseptic technique and “no-touch” handling of sterile components
• Correct tension management (avoiding both slack that snags and tension that pulls)
• Documentation standards (external catheter length, site condition, dressing integrity)
• Awareness of escalation pathways (vascular access team, supervising clinician)

Hospitals often embed securement training into onboarding, annual competencies, and unit-based superuser programs.

Pre-use checks (practical)

Before applying a Catheter securement device, teams typically confirm:

• Packaging intact, sterile indicator (if present) acceptable, and not expired
• Correct product for catheter type (PIVC vs PICC vs CVC vs urinary stabilization)
• Skin is clean, dry, and appropriate for adhesive contact (per protocol)
• Catheter is functioning as expected and is positioned as intended
• Any patient-specific sensitivities documented and communicated

Documentation and traceability readiness

Operationally, documentation is not an afterthought. Many facilities expect:

• Date/time of application and dressing change schedule
• Securement type used (device category and, where required, specific product)
• Site assessment findings and external catheter length (for catheters where it applies)
• Lot/batch documentation if required by policy (often more common for implants or high-risk supplies, but traceability practices vary)

Operational prerequisites (commissioning, maintenance readiness, consumables, policies)

Catheter securement products are usually consumables, but introducing or standardizing them still benefits from “commissioning-style” readiness:

• Value analysis review (clinical suitability, cost-per-use, training burden)
• Compatibility checks (with catheter brands, dressings, skin prep solutions)
• Storage and par levels (unit stocking, crash cart inclusion, procedure kits)
• Recall and shortage plans (substitution guidance and staff communication)
• Waste handling policy (sharps avoidance, adhesive remover disposal)
• Contracting and supply continuity monitoring

Because these products are not typically serviced like capital hospital equipment, “maintenance readiness” usually means having clear policies for storage conditions, shelf-life management, and post-market surveillance (complaints and incident trends).

Roles and responsibilities (who does what)

Roles vary by facility, but a typical split looks like this:

• Clinicians (nursing, physicians, vascular access teams): product selection within policy, application, inspection, patient education, and documentation.
• Infection prevention and control (IPC): dressing and site care standards; compatibility with antiseptics; audit criteria.
• Procurement/supply chain: vendor management, product standardization, pricing, supply continuity, and recall workflows.
• Biomedical engineering/clinical engineering: may support incident investigations, evaluate safety notices, and participate in product introductions depending on organizational structure.
• Risk management/quality: event reporting processes, trend review, and corrective action systems.

H2: How do I use it correctly (basic operation)?

Workflows vary by model and catheter type. The steps below describe a commonly universal approach for adhesive-based and sutureless stabilization systems, framed as general education rather than patient-specific instruction.

Basic step-by-step workflow (non-brand-specific)

1. Confirm appropriateness and gather supplies. Ensure you have the correct Catheter securement device for the catheter type and location, plus dressing materials and labels.
2. Perform hand hygiene and don PPE according to your unit’s aseptic technique level for line care.
3. Assess the site and catheter. Look for moisture, bleeding, dressing disruption, or signs that the catheter has migrated. Confirm the catheter is functioning as expected within your clinical context.
4. Prepare the skin (per protocol). Cleanse with the facility-approved antiseptic and allow adequate drying time. Consider barrier film if your policy supports it for adhesive protection.
5. Plan tubing routing before sticking anything down. Position the catheter hub and tubing so there is neutral tension. A gentle slack loop can reduce traction when the patient moves.
6. Apply the adhesive base/platform. Align the device so it supports the hub without covering areas that must remain visible for assessment (follow local standards). Press firmly to improve adhesion, especially at edges.
7. Engage the retention mechanism. Secure the hub or tubing using the device’s clip/clamp/strap feature. Confirm it is locked as intended and that tubing is not kinked.
8. Apply or reapply the dressing. Use the appropriate dressing method for the catheter type (often a transparent film dressing). Ensure edges are sealed and the insertion area is visible if required.
9. Label and document. Apply date/time labels as required and document securement method, site condition, and any measurement your facility tracks (such as external catheter length for relevant lines).
10. Recheck function and patient comfort. Ensure the line can be accessed and managed without pulling, and that the patient can move without immediate tension on the insertion site.

Setup, calibration, and “settings” (what that means here)

Most Catheter securement device products do not require calibration like electronic medical equipment. Instead, “settings” are usually practical configuration choices:

• Size selection: small/standard/large platforms or pediatric vs adult options
• Orientation: left/right routing or position relative to the insertion site
• Lock position: open/closed, single vs double latch, or clamp alignment
• Tension adjustment: strap tightness or tubing pathway placement

These settings should be chosen to reduce tugging while preserving circulation and comfort, and to keep the site inspectable according to policy.

Steps that are commonly universal across models

Regardless of brand, successful securement usually depends on:

• Clean, dry skin and correct antiseptic drying time
• Minimal handling of adhesive surfaces
• Thoughtful tubing routing to prevent snagging
• A secure lock that does not kink or compress the catheter
• Clear labeling and consistent documentation
• Routine reassessment during shifts and after patient movement

H2: How do I keep the patient safe?

A Catheter securement device is a small piece of hospital equipment, but it sits at a high-risk interface: skin, catheter, and human motion. Safety depends on anticipating failure modes and building reliable routines.

Core safety risks to consider

Common risk categories include:

• Accidental dislodgement or migration: from pulling, transport, repositioning, or dressing failure.
• Catheter dysfunction: kinking, occlusion, or restricted flow due to poor routing or clamp placement.
• Skin injury: including medical adhesive-related skin injury (MARSI), which can include skin stripping, blisters, tears, or dermatitis after adhesive use.
• Pressure injury: if rigid parts press into skin or if straps are overly tight.
• Allergic or irritant reactions: to adhesives, barrier films, or removers (varies by manufacturer and patient).
• Infection prevention concerns: if the securement approach leads to frequent dressing disruptions or obscures inspection.

Securement is one layer of risk control; it does not replace aseptic technique, appropriate catheter selection, or routine site assessment.

Safety practices and monitoring (what teams typically do)

Facilities commonly emphasize:

• Routine visual checks: device adhesion, edge lift, and lock integrity.
• Site checks: redness, swelling, leakage, drainage, tenderness, or unusual warmth (interpretation requires clinical correlation and local protocols).
• External length checks (where applicable): consistent measurement technique and documentation to detect potential migration.
• Tubing management checks: ensure lines are not under tension when the patient changes position.
• Comfort and function: patient feedback matters—pain or “tugging” sensations can be early indicators of traction or skin injury.

Monitoring frequency and documentation fields vary by unit and catheter type.

Alarm handling and human factors (even without electronics)

Most Catheter securement device products have no audible or electronic alarms. Human factors become the “alarm system”:

• Incorporate securement inspection into line access moments (flushes, medication administration).
• Use standardized labeling to reduce missed dressing-change dates.
• Reduce cognitive load: standardize products by unit, catheter type, or patient population.
• Anticipate high-risk moments: transfers, toileting, imaging, physical therapy, and agitated behavior.

Follow protocols and the manufacturer IFU

Two documents matter operationally:

• Facility protocol: defines acceptable products, dressing change intervals, skin prep, and documentation.
• Manufacturer IFU (Instructions for Use): defines exact placement, dwell limits (if any), compatible materials, and removal techniques.

If protocols and IFUs conflict, escalation to clinical leadership and infection prevention is generally appropriate before workarounds become routine.

Risk controls: labeling checks, lot awareness, and incident reporting

Safety culture around consumable medical devices often includes:

• Checking expiry dates and sterile packaging integrity at point-of-care.
• Being alert to unusual product behavior (adhesive failure, brittle plastic, latch breakage).
• Reporting device-related issues through local incident systems.
• Preserving packaging/lot information when a suspected product defect is involved (local policy determines how).

Consistent reporting helps hospitals detect patterns—such as device failures clustered to a lot number, storage condition problems, or training gaps on a specific unit.

H2: How do I interpret the output?

Catheter securement products do not typically generate numeric readings like monitors. The “output” is mostly observational and documentation-based: what you see, what the patient reports, and what you record about stability and skin condition.

Types of outputs/readings in practice

Common “outputs” clinicians assess include:

• Securement integrity: adhesive fully adhered vs edge lift; latch fully closed vs partially engaged.
• Catheter position cues: external catheter length markings (for applicable devices), hub alignment, and whether the catheter appears to have migrated.
• Site appearance: visible skin changes around the dressing border and insertion site (as allowed by dressing type).
• Functional output: whether infusions run smoothly, flushing feels typical (within role and protocol), and whether there is leakage at connections.
• Patient-reported symptoms: pain, itching, burning, or a sensation of pulling.

How clinicians typically interpret them

In many workflows, a “good” status looks like:

• Device fully seated with no lifting corners.
• Tubing routed without kinks and with neutral tension.
• Dressing edges sealed and site visible to the degree required by policy.
• No unexpected change in external length (where tracked).
• Patient comfortable during movement and line access.

Any deviation is interpreted cautiously and in context. For example, adhesive lifting after a shower or high perspiration may signal the need for earlier dressing/securement replacement per protocol.

Common pitfalls and limitations

Interpretation errors often come from:

• False reassurance: assuming “secured” means “correctly positioned” (tip location and line function still require clinical correlation).
• Measurement inconsistency: external length readings can vary with technique, swelling, or dressing movement.
• Hidden skin injury: opaque borders, poor lighting, or anchoring elements can obscure early irritation.
• Overuse of reinforcement tape: may trap moisture or complicate skin assessment, depending on local practice.

When in doubt, clinicians typically escalate to experienced staff (IV team, charge nurse, supervising clinician) rather than relying on visual interpretation alone.

H2: What if something goes wrong?

When problems occur, the priorities are patient safety, line function, infection prevention, and clear documentation. The checklist below is general and should be adapted to facility policy.

Troubleshooting checklist (practical, non-brand-specific)

• Check the patient first: discomfort, bleeding, swelling, or acute distress should trigger immediate clinical assessment.
• Inspect the securement device: lifted edges, broken latch, or poor adhesion.
• Inspect tubing routing: kinks, tension across a joint, or snag points on bedrails/clothing.
• Confirm dressing integrity: loose edges, moisture under the dressing, or contamination concerns.
• Consider environmental factors: sweat, skin oils, recent bathing, or heavy movement can reduce adhesion.
• Review timing: is the device past the usual replacement interval in your facility?

Common issues and what teams often do

• Adhesive won’t stick: reassess skin prep and drying time; confirm product storage conditions; consider barrier film per protocol; switch to an alternative method if policy allows.
• Device detaches during transport: re-secure using the approved method; consider routing and slack management; review transport workflows for snag points.
• Suspected catheter migration or dislodgement: stop and escalate according to local protocol; avoid “pushing back” catheters unless specifically permitted by policy and scope of practice.
• Skin irritation or blistering: remove adhesive carefully using approved remover if used; escalate and document; consider alternative products or strategies per protocol.

When to stop use

In general, teams pause or stop using the device (and escalate) when there is:

• Evidence of compromised sterility or contamination
• Significant skin injury or suspected allergic reaction
• Device breakage or inability to lock securely
• Suspected catheter malposition, partial dislodgement, or uncontrolled bleeding
• Any patient safety concern that cannot be quickly resolved within protocol

Escalation pathways (who to involve)

• Unit leadership or supervising clinician: patient assessment, catheter decisions, and care plan changes.
• Vascular access/IV therapy team: securement alternatives, difficult sites, or migration concerns.
• Infection prevention: clusters of dressing failures or suspected contamination issues.
• Biomedical/clinical engineering: device defect evaluation processes vary, but they may support investigations and safety notice management.
• Procurement/supply chain: lot/stock review, storage issues, and vendor escalation.
• Manufacturer: reporting suspected product defects per facility policy.

Documentation and safety reporting expectations

Documentation typically includes:

• What happened (objective description)
• Patient impact (symptoms, line interruption, reinsertion required)
• Product details (type, size, lot if available)
• Actions taken and who was notified
• Incident report completion per policy

A consistent reporting culture is often the difference between isolated “mystery failures” and a fixable system issue.

H2: Infection control and cleaning of Catheter securement device

Infection prevention for Catheter securement device use is less about “cleaning the device” (many are single-use) and more about maintaining aseptic technique, dressing integrity, and appropriate handling.

Cleaning principles (what applies in real workflows)

Key principles include:

• Keep sterile items sterile until use.
• Reduce touch contamination by planning placement and tubing routing before application.
• Protect the insertion site with an appropriate dressing strategy.
• Minimize unnecessary dressing disruptions (each disruption is a risk moment).

Disinfection vs. sterilization (general definitions)

• Disinfection: reduces microorganisms on surfaces; used for environmental cleaning and some reusable items.
• Sterilization: eliminates all forms of microbial life; used for surgical instruments and some invasive devices.

Most Catheter securement device products intended for insertion-site use are supplied sterile and are designed for single-patient, often single-use application. Re-sterilizing adhesive-based components is generally not feasible and is not recommended unless explicitly stated in the manufacturer IFU (often not publicly stated; varies by manufacturer).

High-touch points to prioritize

Even if the securement product is disposable, the surrounding workflow includes high-touch surfaces:

• Catheter hubs, needleless connectors, and clamps (per line access protocol)
• Dressing borders and edges (hands frequently contact these)
• Scissors or cutters (if used and permitted)
• Storage bins and procedure carts (restocking introduces contamination risk)
• Bedrails, IV poles, and transport equipment (tubing snag points and touch zones)

Example cleaning and handling workflow (non-brand-specific)

• Before application: clean the work surface; perform hand hygiene; prepare supplies; open sterile items using aseptic technique.
• During application: avoid touching adhesive surfaces unnecessarily; keep catheter hubs protected; maintain a clean field.
• During routine care: access hubs using your facility’s disinfection method; avoid lifting dressing edges for “quick looks” unless protocol requires it.
• During removal/replacement: remove gently to protect skin; dispose of single-use components; perform hand hygiene; clean any reusable accessories per policy.

Always defer to IFU and facility IPC policy

The manufacturer IFU defines the intended use, compatible skin prep products, and removal technique. Facility infection prevention policy defines how that IFU is applied in your patient population and staffing context. When uncertainty exists, escalation is safer than improvisation.

H2: Medical Device Companies & OEMs

Manufacturer vs. OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer)

In the medical device world:

• A manufacturer is typically the entity responsible for design controls, quality management systems, labeling, and regulatory compliance for the finished clinical device sold under its name.
• An OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) may produce a component (for example, adhesive materials, molded plastic parts, or clamps) or even an entire product that is then branded and sold by another company.

OEM relationships can matter operationally because they influence:

• Component consistency (adhesive performance, plastic brittleness, latch fit)
• Change control (how design or material changes are managed and communicated)
• Traceability (lot-level investigation of complaints)
• Support model (who provides training, field notices, and complaint handling)

For Catheter securement device programs, hospitals often care less about the corporate structure and more about practical outcomes: reliable supply, clear IFUs, consistent product performance, and responsive complaint handling.

Top 5 World Best Medical Device Companies / Manufacturers

Example industry leaders (not a ranking; categories and availability vary by region and portfolio changes over time):

1. 3M
   3M is widely known for medical adhesives, dressings, and skin-facing products used across hospitals and clinics. Its healthcare portfolio often intersects with securement and dressing workflows, where adhesion performance and skin tolerance are key operational considerations. Global availability and product standardization can vary by country and contracting model.

2. BD (Becton, Dickinson and Company)
   BD is a multinational medical technology company with broad offerings in vascular access, infusion, and medication management. Many hospitals associate BD with catheter-related consumables and systems that integrate with line care workflows. Regional portfolios and branding may differ depending on market and acquisitions.

3. B. Braun
   B. Braun is a global healthcare company with significant presence in infusion therapy, vascular access, and hospital consumables. In many systems, B. Braun is part of standardized IV therapy and line management programs, where securement decisions are tied to catheter choice and dressing protocols. Local manufacturing and distribution footprints vary by region.

4. Baxter International
   Baxter is known for hospital-based therapies and consumables, particularly in infusion-related care environments. While product categories and availability vary by market, Baxter is commonly involved in supply contracts that include IV therapy components and associated accessories. Procurement teams often consider integration and supply continuity when dealing with broad-line vendors.

5. Teleflex
   Teleflex is associated with single-use medical equipment across anesthesia, respiratory, and vascular access-related categories. In many markets, Teleflex participates in catheter and line-care ecosystems where securement and dressing strategies are operationally important. As with other manufacturers, the specific securement offerings available depend on country and distributor relationships.

H2: Vendors, Suppliers, and Distributors

What’s the difference?

In hospital operations, the terms can overlap, but they often mean:

• Vendor: the entity you buy from (could be a manufacturer, distributor, or reseller).
• Supplier: an organization that provides goods to your facility; may include wholesalers and contracted partners.
• Distributor: a company specializing in logistics—holding inventory, delivering to sites, offering ordering platforms, and sometimes providing kitting or inventory management services.

For Catheter securement device procurement, distributor performance can directly affect stockouts, substitution practices, and recall responsiveness—especially in multi-site systems.

Top 5 World Best Vendors / Suppliers / Distributors

Example global distributors (not a ranking; service scope varies by country):

1. McKesson
   McKesson is widely recognized for large-scale healthcare distribution and supply chain services in markets where it operates. Buyers often use such distributors for routine consumables, formulary standardization, and logistics support. Service offerings can include inventory programs and delivery coordination, depending on region.

2. Cardinal Health
   Cardinal Health is known for distributing medical and surgical products and supporting hospital supply chains. Many facilities work with distributors like Cardinal to manage high-volume consumables where availability and delivery reliability are central. Specific portfolio access depends on country operations and contracting.

3. Medline
   Medline is associated with broad hospital consumable portfolios and supply chain services. In many settings, distributors of this type support standardized products for nursing units, including dressing and securement-adjacent supplies. Offerings and reach vary by geography.

4. Owens & Minor
   Owens & Minor is known for healthcare logistics and distribution services in certain regions. Hospital procurement teams may engage such distributors for ongoing consumables, supply chain resilience programs, and integrated delivery models. Local footprint and service depth vary.

5. Henry Schein
   Henry Schein is well known in dental and medical distribution, with service models that can include clinics and ambulatory settings as well as some hospital segments. For securement-related supplies, distributors with strong outpatient reach can be important in home care and ambulatory infusion ecosystems. Market presence differs by country.

H2: Global Market Snapshot by Country

India

Demand for Catheter securement device products is influenced by high inpatient volumes, expanding private hospital networks, and growing use of infusion therapy in tertiary centers. Price sensitivity is significant, so tape-based methods may persist alongside engineered securement in different tiers of care. Urban centers typically have stronger training ecosystems and more consistent access than rural facilities.

China

China’s market reflects large-scale hospital systems, increasing procedural volume, and emphasis on standardized consumables in many urban facilities. Import dependence exists for some premium consumables, while domestic manufacturing also plays a major role. Distribution strength and product selection can differ markedly between coastal cities and inland regions.

United States

In the United States, Catheter securement device adoption is shaped by standardized line-care protocols, risk management priorities, and strong purchasing organizations. Facilities often evaluate products through value analysis committees, balancing skin safety, usability, and total cost of care. Home infusion and post-acute care also influence demand for durable, user-friendly securement approaches.

Indonesia

Indonesia’s demand is driven by expanding hospital capacity, rising procedural care in urban areas, and uneven access across an archipelago geography. Many facilities rely on distributor networks for imported consumables, and product standardization can vary by region and hospital ownership type. Training consistency and supply continuity are common operational challenges.

Pakistan

Pakistan’s market includes a mix of public and private sector procurement, with strong cost constraints affecting securement choices. In tertiary urban hospitals, demand for standardized line-care consumables is increasing, while smaller facilities may rely on basic materials. Distribution and cold-chain are less relevant here than reliable last-mile logistics and stock availability.

Nigeria

Nigeria’s demand is shaped by a growing private healthcare sector, high burden of acute care needs, and significant variability in supply access. Import dependence can be substantial for branded consumables, and stockouts may drive substitutions. Urban hospitals tend to have better access to training and product variety than rural settings.

Brazil

Brazil combines a large hospital market with established distributor channels and a mix of domestic and imported medical equipment. Adoption of Catheter securement device products varies across public and private systems, with procurement rules and contracting influencing product choice. Large urban centers often lead in standardization and training initiatives.

Bangladesh

Bangladesh’s demand reflects high patient volumes and rapid development of private hospitals in major cities, alongside resource constraints in many settings. Import reliance is common for branded consumables, while local sourcing may cover basic alternatives. Product selection and staff training can vary widely between urban tertiary centers and peripheral facilities.

Russia

Russia’s market is influenced by centralized procurement dynamics in some regions and variable access to imported consumables. Domestic production plays a role, and distributor ecosystems can differ across federal districts. Hospitals often prioritize supply continuity and acceptable substitutes during periods of constrained import availability.

Mexico

Mexico’s demand is supported by large urban hospital systems and an expanding private care segment, with procurement models spanning public tenders and private contracting. Distributor networks often determine which securement and dressing products are consistently available. Rural access and training resources can lag behind major metropolitan centers.

Ethiopia

Ethiopia’s market is shaped by healthcare investment focused on expanding access, with ongoing reliance on cost-effective consumables and donor-supported procurement in some contexts. Engineered Catheter securement device adoption may be concentrated in tertiary and teaching hospitals. Distribution logistics and training capacity remain key determinants of availability and consistent use.

Japan

Japan’s demand reflects a mature hospital system with emphasis on quality processes, standardized nursing practice, and strong attention to workflow reliability. Product selection often prioritizes usability, skin tolerance, and compatibility with established line-care protocols. An aging population and high procedural volumes can support consistent use in acute and chronic care pathways.

Philippines

The Philippines has a mixed public-private healthcare landscape with strong urban demand and variable access in provincial and island settings. Import dependence is common for many consumables, and distributor performance strongly affects continuity. Training and standardization initiatives are often more consistent in larger hospital groups and city centers.

Egypt

Egypt’s market includes large public hospitals and a growing private sector, with procurement influenced by budget constraints and tender processes. Catheter securement device use may be more standardized in tertiary urban hospitals and specialty centers. Distribution reach beyond major cities can shape whether facilities rely on engineered products or simpler alternatives.

Democratic Republic of the Congo

In the Democratic Republic of the Congo, access and affordability are major determinants of securement practices, with significant variability between urban hospitals and remote facilities. Import dependence and logistics challenges can limit consistent availability of branded consumables. Training resources and infection prevention infrastructure also influence adoption of standardized securement products.

Vietnam

Vietnam’s demand is driven by expanding hospital capacity, increasing procedural volume, and modernization efforts in urban centers. Import channels and local distributors play a central role in availability, while domestic manufacturing may cover some basic consumables. Standardization tends to be stronger in large city hospitals than in provincial facilities.

Iran

Iran’s market reflects a combination of domestic manufacturing capability and variable access to imported products. Hospitals often prioritize reliable supply and cost control, which can influence securement device selection and substitution practices. Training and protocol standardization may be more consistent in larger academic centers.

Turkey

Turkey’s demand is supported by a sizable hospital sector, active private healthcare market, and a strategic distribution position bridging regions. Facilities often focus on standardization, product performance, and supply continuity, especially in high-throughput centers. Availability can differ between major metropolitan hospitals and smaller provincial facilities.

Germany

Germany’s market emphasizes standardized clinical processes, strong procurement structures, and broad access to regulated medical equipment. Catheter securement device selection often aligns with nursing protocols, skin safety considerations, and interoperability with dressing systems. Distributor reliability and documentation requirements are typically well developed across hospital networks.

Thailand

Thailand’s demand includes large urban hospitals and medical tourism-linked facilities, alongside variable access in rural regions. Adoption of engineered securement products may be higher in tertiary centers with robust infection prevention and vascular access programs. Import reliance and distributor partnerships affect product continuity and training support.

H2: Key Takeaways and Practical Checklist for Catheter securement device

• Treat Catheter securement device selection as part of a complete catheter-care system, not a standalone choice.
• Match the securement method to catheter type (PIVC, PICC, CVC, arterial line) per local protocol.
• Confirm sterile packaging integrity and expiry before opening any securement product.
• Plan tubing routing and slack management before applying adhesive to skin.
• Prioritize clean, dry skin and allow antiseptic to dry fully to support adhesion.
• Avoid placing retention parts where they can create pressure points under patient movement.
• Aim for neutral tension: too much slack increases snagging; too much tension increases traction injury risk.
• Keep the insertion site assessable according to your facility’s dressing and inspection standards.
• Document the securement method used and the condition of skin at the time of application.
• Track external catheter length when your protocol requires it and measure consistently.
• Reassess securement after transfers, imaging, physiotherapy, and major repositioning events.
• Treat edge lift, moisture under dressing, or a loose latch as early failure signs—not minor issues.
• Use adhesive removers and gentle technique when removing to reduce MARSI risk.
• Do not reuse single-use securement components, even if they “look clean.”
• Avoid improvising with non-approved tapes or straps when standardized products are available.
• Escalate promptly if catheter migration or partial dislodgement is suspected.
• Build securement checks into routine line-access moments to reduce missed failures.
• Standardize products within units when possible to reduce training burden and variation.
• Include securement products in procedure kits when it improves consistency and availability.
• Involve infection prevention early when changing securement products or dressing protocols.
• Capture lot information when investigating suspected product defects or clustered failures.
• Ensure transport teams understand tubing management to prevent accidental line pulls.
• Stock appropriate sizes (adult/pediatric, different platforms) where patient mix requires it.
• Train staff on device-specific lock mechanisms because “looks closed” may not mean “locked.”
• Avoid covering irritated skin with stronger adhesives; reassess the approach and escalate.
• Treat securement-related skin injury as a reportable safety signal, not an expected tradeoff.
• Use patient education (as appropriate) to reduce accidental pulling and improve comfort.
• Coordinate securement choices with dressing materials to prevent incompatibility issues.
• Store consumables within recommended temperature and humidity ranges when stated.
• Audit securement technique as part of broader catheter-care quality programs.
• Define acceptable substitutions in advance to manage shortages without unsafe improvisation.
• Engage procurement with clinician feedback to balance cost, usability, and supply reliability.
• Encourage incident reporting for device failures to support system-level improvements.
• Review securement practices during onboarding and annually for high-risk units.
• Align securement documentation fields in the electronic health record (EHR) with local policy.
• Use a consistent removal technique to minimize skin trauma and dressing disruption.
• Treat Catheter securement device performance complaints as clinical engineering/procurement data, not only bedside frustration.
• Re-evaluate securement approaches when patient mobility level changes (improves or worsens).
• Keep spare securement supplies available for unplanned dressing changes and emergent re-securement.
• Make securement part of “line necessity” reviews: if a line must stay, it must be stabilized.
• Ensure waste disposal pathways are clear for adhesive products and contaminated dressings.
• Remember that securement does not guarantee correct catheter tip position; correlate with clinical context and policy.

If you are looking for contributions and suggestion for this content please drop an email to contact@myhospitalnow.com