Episiotomy scissors: Overview, Uses and Top Manufacturer Company

Posted on February 27, 2026 | by drthomas

Introduction

Episiotomy scissors are specialized surgical scissors used in obstetrics when a clinician performs an episiotomy—an intentional incision of perineal tissue to enlarge the vaginal opening during childbirth. Although they are a simple medical device, they are used at a high-stakes moment where sterility, sharp safety, tissue handling, and team communication all matter.

Episiotomy practice has evolved substantially in many regions, with a shift away from routine episiotomy toward more selective use. Even in facilities where episiotomy rates are low, the instrument remains important because the need can arise unexpectedly during time-sensitive births. This creates a practical operational challenge: the scissors must be immediately available, sterile, and functional despite potentially infrequent use.

For medical students and trainees, Episiotomy scissors are often one of the first “named” obstetric instruments encountered on a labor and delivery unit, and they provide a practical way to learn instrument recognition, sterile technique, and safe passing of sharps. For hospital administrators and operations leaders, they are part of core hospital equipment that must be standardized, available 24/7, correctly reprocessed, and maintained within an instrument lifecycle program.

Because this instrument sits at the intersection of clinical technique and hospital operations, it can be a useful “case study” for how small variations in purchasing, set assembly, cleaning, inspection, and sharpening can change outcomes. A high-quality pair that is poorly reprocessed can perform worse than a lower-cost pair that is consistently inspected and maintained.

This article provides general, educational information on what Episiotomy scissors are, how they are used in typical workflows, key safety and infection control considerations, and how procurement and service decisions play out across different health systems globally. Practices vary by facility policy, clinician training, and manufacturer instructions for use (IFU).

What is Episiotomy scissors and why do we use it?

Definition and purpose

Episiotomy scissors are a hand-operated cutting instrument designed for controlled incision of perineal tissue during vaginal birth when an episiotomy is performed. Their purpose is not simply “to cut,” but to cut precisely, smoothly, and with reduced risk to adjacent structures compared with using an unsuitable scissor pattern.

In practical terms, “precision” includes the ability to start the incision safely, maintain a predictable cutting line, and avoid unintended extension. The perineal area is anatomically complex and often under tension during birth; a device that cuts cleanly with minimal force can support more controlled tissue handling than a tool that crushes or tears.

In most facilities, Episiotomy scissors are part of an obstetric procedure set that may also include tissue forceps, needle holders, hemostats, sutures, and materials for perineal repair. They are considered a critical clinical device because they contact tissue and are used in a time-sensitive clinical scenario.

It is also helpful to distinguish the instrument’s role from other cutting needs in the same environment. Labor and delivery units may have multiple scissors available (suture scissors, bandage scissors, general surgical scissors). Episiotomy scissors are designed for a specific tissue incision task, and using them as a “general scissor” can degrade performance and undermine readiness when needed.

Common design features (what makes them different)

Episiotomy scissors vary by manufacturer, but many share design themes intended to support safety and control:

Angled or curved blades to improve visibility and approach in the perineal area.
Blunt (rounded) tip on at least one blade to help reduce the risk of unintended injury during placement near delicate tissue.
Short-to-medium blade length that favors control over reach.
Ring handles for a stable grip and controlled leverage.
Robust hinge (box lock or screw joint, varies by manufacturer) to maintain alignment under cutting force.
Stainless steel construction is common for reusable models; finishes and alloys vary by manufacturer.
Some models may include tungsten carbide (TC) inserts for edge retention; this is not universal and varies by manufacturer.

Additional design details that often matter in day-to-day use and reprocessing include:

Offset shanks (handle-to-blade geometry) that keep the operator’s hand slightly away from the incision line, improving visibility and reducing interference with the sterile field.
Surface finish choices such as satin/matte (to reduce glare under bright procedure lights) versus mirror polish (often easier to wipe clean but can show scratches and glare).
Markings for identification and tracking, including laser etching, size markings, and (for TC models) common visual cues like inlays or colored rings depending on brand conventions.
Blade edge geometry (hollow-ground vs beveled) that influences cutting feel, edge durability, and sharpening method.
Tip geometry on blunt tips: a well-finished blunt tip should be smooth and rounded; a damaged or chipped “blunt” tip can become unexpectedly sharp.

You may also hear common pattern names (for example, angled obstetric designs). Facilities typically standardize one or two patterns to simplify training, maintenance, and instrument set assembly.

Typical sizes and ergonomics: Many episiotomy scissors are produced in sizes that balance control and access, commonly in the mid-teens of centimeters in overall length. Even small differences in length, angle, and ring size can affect hand comfort, especially during prolonged repair workflows. Some facilities consider left-handed ergonomics or ring inserts for staff comfort, although dedicated left-handed scissors are less commonly standardized in obstetrics than in other surgical specialties.

Where Episiotomy scissors are used

Typical settings include:

Labor and delivery rooms (routine and high-risk)
Maternity operating rooms (for assisted vaginal birth and urgent obstetric procedures)
Emergency obstetric care trays in smaller hospitals
Field or low-resource maternity centers where instrument sets must be compact and durable

In addition, episiotomy scissors may be stocked in:

Pre-packed procedure kits assembled by a sterile processing department or purchased as disposable packs (where permitted), designed to reduce setup time during urgent deliveries.
Satellite supply areas on large L&D units so that a functioning pair can be obtained quickly if a primary set is incomplete or contaminated.
Teaching and simulation labs, where non-sterile training instruments are used to teach handling and recognition without affecting clinical inventory.

Because they are basic medical equipment, Episiotomy scissors may be managed through central sterile processing rather than biomedical engineering (Biomed). However, lifecycle and quality systems often involve multiple departments.

Key benefits in patient care and workflow

When the correct instrument is available, sterile, and sharp:

Speed and control improve during a time-sensitive procedure.
Cut quality tends to be smoother than using general-purpose scissors, supporting predictable tissue handling.
Standardization reduces variability in technique, instrument passing, and reprocessing.
Workflow reliability improves because the instrument is part of a known, complete set with defined reprocessing steps.

Additional operational benefits show up “downstream” after the cut:

A clean incision edge can support more predictable approximation during repair, potentially reducing repair time and frustration for clinicians.
Consistent instrument performance can reduce last-minute substitutions, which are a common source of process variation and documentation gaps.
Standardized scissors patterns can simplify training for rotating residents, traveling nurses, and new staff, especially in multi-site health systems.

From an operations perspective, Episiotomy scissors also illustrate a broader theme: even low-cost instruments can create high downstream impact if they are dull, missing from sets, inconsistently sourced, or poorly reprocessed.

How it functions (plain-language mechanism)

Episiotomy scissors work by converting hand force at the rings into cutting force at the blades via the hinge. The two sharpened edges pass tightly against each other; when alignment and tension are correct, the edges shear tissue rather than tearing it. The hinge tension, blade sharpness, and alignment largely determine whether the cut is smooth or ragged.

At a mechanical level, scissors rely on controlled “shearing” where one blade slides against the other with minimal separation. If the joint loosens, the blades can gap during cutting, forcing the user to apply extra pressure and increasing the chance of ragged edges. If the joint is too tight or contaminated with residue, the instrument may feel stiff or gritty, which can reduce fine control.

Unlike electronic devices, there are no software parameters. “Performance” is mainly mechanical: sharpness, alignment, smooth opening/closing, and integrity of the tips and hinge.

In sterile processing, functionality is often assessed using standardized checks (for example, visual inspection under magnification, hinge tension feel, and cutting tests on approved materials). At the bedside, teams typically rely on quick open-close and alignment checks rather than formal sharpness testing.

How medical students encounter Episiotomy scissors in training

Medical students and trainees typically learn Episiotomy scissors through:

Instrument identification in obstetrics teaching sessions and skills labs
Sterile technique basics (opening sterile packs, maintaining a sterile field)
Passing and receiving sharps safely (closed blades, handle-first passing)
Understanding procedure trays and why standard sets reduce delays and errors
Observing (and later assisting with) perineal repair workflows, where instrument choice affects ease of suturing and tissue handling

Many programs also incorporate:

Simulation-based training, using perineal models to practice safe positioning and controlled cutting motions without patient risk.
Interprofessional workflow training, where learners practice communication with nurses/midwives and scrub staff, including how to request, receive, and return sharps.
Structured competency checklists, ensuring learners can name the instrument, explain basic safety considerations, and recognize when an instrument should be replaced.

Learning is usually stepwise: recognition and handling first, then supervised use within local protocols and credentialing requirements.

When should I use Episiotomy scissors (and when should I not)?

Appropriate use cases

Episiotomy scissors are intended for use when an episiotomy is being performed by a trained clinician as part of vaginal birth management under local policy. In general terms, they are used to:

Create a controlled perineal incision during vaginal birth when an episiotomy is performed
Extend an incision in a controlled manner if clinically required (technique and decision-making vary)
Trim tissue in a controlled way during perineal repair when appropriate (practice varies)

In many health systems, episiotomy practice has shifted toward selective use rather than routine use, but the decision remains clinician- and protocol-dependent. The key operational point is that Episiotomy scissors must be available and functional when required, even if use is not frequent in every unit.

From a workflow standpoint, “appropriate use” also includes using the instrument in the context of a prepared repair plan. Because episiotomy typically requires subsequent repair, facilities often ensure that the episiotomy scissors are part of a set that already includes needle holders and appropriate forceps so the team does not have to assemble tools mid-procedure.

When it may not be suitable

Episiotomy scissors may be unsuitable or a poor choice when:

The instrument is not sterile or sterility is in doubt (pack wet, torn, indicator not as expected, or chain-of-custody uncertain).
The scissors are dull, misaligned, stiff, loose, corroded, or visibly damaged.
A different tool is required for the task (for example, cutting sutures, opening packaging, or trimming dressings), because misusing Episiotomy scissors can degrade performance and increase contamination risk.
The setting cannot maintain basic asepsis (for example, no reliable reprocessing or no sterile supplies available); local protocols should govern alternatives.

A few additional “not suitable” scenarios that commonly arise operationally include:

Expired or improperly stored sterile packs, where sterility maintenance over time is uncertain depending on local event-related sterility policies.
Mixed sets with inconsistent patterns, where a substituted scissor does not match staff expectations (angle, length, tip type), increasing the chance of awkward handling or delays.
Unknown instrument provenance, such as untracked instruments brought in from outside the facility without validated reprocessing history.

From a quality perspective, “not suitable” often means “not safe to deploy from a sterile processing and mechanical integrity standpoint,” even before clinical factors are considered.

Safety cautions and general contraindications (non-clinical)

This is informational guidance, not medical advice. General cautions include:

Treat Episiotomy scissors as sharps at all times; keep blades closed when not actively cutting.
Avoid “blind” cutting; safe use depends on visual control and careful placement.
Do not use if there is any concern about instrument integrity (bent tip, loose screw, uneven blade contact, or grinding).
Do not mix reusable and single-use processes; single-use scissors should not be reprocessed unless the manufacturer explicitly provides validated instructions (varies by manufacturer and local regulation).

Additional practical cautions that affect staff safety include:

Maintain a clear verbal cue (for example, announcing “sharp”) and a consistent passing method to reduce accidental sticks.
If the scissors are dropped or leave the sterile field, treat them as contaminated per policy and replace rather than attempting to “salvage” them during a procedure.
Avoid soaking in corrosive solutions (for example, saline or bleach-based chemicals) during point-of-use holding, as this can damage the hinge and edges over time and contribute to staining that mimics rust.

Emphasize clinical judgment, supervision, and local protocols

Whether an episiotomy is performed, and how it is performed, depends on clinical assessment, supervision, informed consent processes, and facility protocols. Trainees should use Episiotomy scissors only under appropriate supervision and within credentialed roles. Facilities should ensure staff understand not only “how to cut,” but also when the instrument is indicated, how to handle it safely, and how it fits into reprocessing and documentation systems.

What do I need before starting?

Required setup, environment, and accessories

At a minimum, safe use requires:

A clean, appropriately equipped clinical area with adequate lighting
A maintained sterile field, including sterile gloves and drapes per policy
A sterile instrument set containing Episiotomy scissors and other tools required for the planned workflow
A sharps management approach (for example, a neutral zone or designated tray area) and a sharps container for post-procedure disposal of single-use items

Accessories and companion items vary by facility and local practice, but often include hemostats, needle holders, tissue forceps, gauze/swabs, suture material for repair, and documentation tools for counts and procedure notes.

Operationally, it is also useful to ensure:

A backup plan for missing/failed instruments, such as a spare sterile peel pack or an alternate tray stored nearby, particularly on busy units where turnover is rapid.
Adequate visualization, which may include adjustable lights or headlamps depending on facility setup and staffing.
Appropriate workspace organization, keeping the sterile tray uncluttered so sharps can be placed and retrieved consistently without “searching” with gloved hands.

Training and competency expectations

For clinicians and trainees, competency typically includes:

Instrument identification and correct naming (to reduce “wrong instrument” passing)
Sterile technique fundamentals
Sharps safety and safe passing behaviors
Basic mechanical understanding (how dullness or misalignment affects tissue handling)
Awareness of local obstetric protocols and supervision requirements

For operations leaders, competency also includes ensuring staff know the escalation path when an instrument is defective, missing, or non-sterile.

For sterile processing teams, competency expectations often include:

Correct point-of-use handling expectations communicated to clinical staff (keeping instruments moist, avoiding corrosives, safe transport).
Inspection techniques for hinges and cutting surfaces, including recognizing staining, pitting, and early corrosion.
Understanding when an instrument can be sharpened or adjusted versus when it should be condemned and removed from service.

Pre-use checks (quick but meaningful)

Before use, many teams perform a brief functional and sterility check:

Confirm the instrument is from a sterile pack with expected indicators and intact packaging
Open and close the scissors to confirm smooth motion without grinding
Check blade alignment (tips meet appropriately, no crossing or gapping)
Look for damage (bent tips, chips, cracks, corrosion, discoloration)
Confirm the correct pattern/size is present for the procedure set

If any of these checks fail, the safest general action is to replace the instrument with a verified sterile and functional alternative and route the suspect item for inspection.

In some facilities, staff also look for:

Residue or film near the hinge that can indicate inadequate cleaning or detergent carryover.
Unusual odor from packaging (a rare but concerning sign of storage or processing issues).
Packaging labels that match the expected set name and sterilization method, reducing the risk of using a mismatched tray.

Documentation and traceability

Documentation expectations vary, but common elements include:

Procedure documentation that notes key instruments used when required by policy
Instrument counts or tray verification processes (even outside a formal operating room)
Traceability of sets through sterile processing systems (barcodes/RFID, where available)
Incident reporting if an instrument defect or sterility breach is identified

For some reusable instruments, Unique Device Identifier (UDI) marking or individual traceability may not be present or may vary by manufacturer and jurisdiction. Where available, asset marking supports maintenance and recall management.

In facilities with mature tracking programs, traceability can extend to:

Sterilizer load records (cycle type, parameters, operator, lot control).
Set history (how often a tray is used, how often it fails inspection, and repair frequency).
Linking sterilization labels to the patient record in operating-room-style workflows, even when the procedure occurs in L&D rather than a main OR.

Operational prerequisites (commissioning, maintenance readiness, consumables, policies)

Even simple hospital equipment benefits from structured lifecycle management:

Commissioning/acceptance: inspection on arrival, verification against purchase specs, and confirmation that reprocessing parameters align with available washer/sterilizer capabilities.
Maintenance readiness: a sharpening and repair pathway (in-house or outsourced), defined turnaround times, and spare inventory to prevent set failures.
Consumables: cleaning detergents, enzymatic agents, brushes sized for hinges/serrations, lubricants (water-soluble “instrument milk,” varies by policy), wraps/pouches, and chemical indicators.
Policies: clear guidance on single-use vs reusable, point-of-use handling, transport to decontamination, and criteria for removing instruments from service.

A common procurement pitfall is buying an instrument that is “good on paper” but mismatched to actual reprocessing capacity. For example, a facility might standardize a scissor model that requires a particular low-temperature sterilization approach or specific lubrication steps that are not consistently available. Aligning purchasing specs, IFUs, and real-world workflows reduces this risk.

Roles and responsibilities (clinician vs. biomedical engineering vs. procurement)

Roles vary by facility, but a practical division is:

Clinicians and nurses/midwives: correct selection and safe use, sterile field maintenance, immediate post-use handling, and reporting defects.
Sterile processing department (SPD) / central sterile supply department (CSSD): cleaning, inspection, packaging, sterilization, set assembly, and documentation.
Biomedical engineering (Biomed): may support system-level quality and tracking programs, especially where instruments are integrated into asset systems; involvement varies by hospital.
Procurement and supply chain: vendor qualification, contract terms, standardization across sites, and ensuring consistent availability.
Infection prevention and quality/risk teams: policy development, audit, incident review, and continuous improvement.

In larger health systems, additional roles may include clinical educators (who standardize instrument teaching), value analysis committees (who compare products on safety and total cost), and service partners (who provide scheduled sharpening and refurbishment programs).

How do I use it correctly (basic operation)?

A universal workflow (model-agnostic)

Workflows vary by facility and clinical context, but these steps are widely applicable to Episiotomy scissors as a mechanical cutting instrument:

Verify the correct sterile set is opened and Episiotomy scissors are present.
Perform a quick functional check (smooth action, alignment, no visible damage).
Keep the scissors within the sterile field and maintain a controlled, uncluttered working area.
Hold the instrument using a stable scissor grip (thumb and ring finger in rings; index finger may guide the shank for control, technique varies).
Keep blades closed when moving the instrument, passing it, or repositioning.
Make controlled cuts with direct awareness of surrounding tissue and structures; avoid forcing the blades through tissue.
After use, place Episiotomy scissors in a designated safe zone on the sterile tray until counts/cleanup are complete.
Ensure post-procedure instrument handling follows local policy (counts if required, safe transport to decontamination, and documentation).

This section describes general instrument operation and handling, not clinical decision-making about whether an episiotomy should be performed.

Two additional workflow habits often improve safety and efficiency:

Communicate clearly when the instrument is being passed, used, and returned (for example, verbalizing “sharp” and confirming the neutral zone location).
At case end, communicate any performance concerns (stiff hinge, dull cut, staining) so the instrument can be routed for inspection rather than silently returned to circulation.

Setup, calibration, and what “settings” mean for a manual instrument

Episiotomy scissors do not have electronic calibration or software settings. Instead, “readiness” is mechanical:

Joint tension: should be firm enough to cut cleanly without wobble, but not so tight that motion is jerky.
Blade contact: blades should meet evenly along the cutting surface.
Tip integrity: tips should be intact; blunt tip designs should remain smooth and non-jagged.

Some scissors use a screw joint that can be adjusted, but adjustment is typically handled by sterile processing or instrument repair services, not at the bedside. If the scissors feel too loose, too tight, or misaligned, replacement is usually safer than attempting adjustment during a procedure.

From a maintenance standpoint, “calibration” is often achieved through:

Periodic hinge tension adjustment (where applicable)
Sharpening that preserves the intended edge angle
Inspection for “blade set” issues (where one blade no longer rides correctly against the other)

These steps are typically performed by trained instrument technicians using jigs and gauges, since improper adjustment can make the instrument unsafe or shorten its life.

Typical selection choices (the practical “settings” hospitals standardize)

Hospitals often standardize a limited set of options to reduce variability:

Angled vs straight pattern depending on local preference and training
Blade length to balance control and access
Reusable vs single-use based on reprocessing capacity, infection control policy, and cost models
Left-handed vs right-handed designs (less common, but relevant for ergonomics)

Selection should be consistent within a site so that trainees, nurses, and sterile processing staff all handle the same patterns with predictable maintenance and reprocessing requirements.

Other practical selection considerations include:

Compatibility with tip protection and packaging (some designs fit standard tip guards more reliably).
Consistency of metallurgy and hardness (important for edge retention and frequency of sharpening).
Availability of repair support (some premium models are designed for repeated refurbishment, while others are effectively “replace when dull”).

Steps that are commonly universal across models

Regardless of the brand or pattern, safe use tends to depend on the same fundamentals:

Verify sterility and function before use.
Maintain control: closed blades while moving, deliberate cutting motion when used.
Treat as a sharp: safe passing, clear communication, and safe placement on the tray.
Avoid misuse: do not use Episiotomy scissors for tasks outside their intended purpose.
Protect the instrument after use: avoid tossing into basins or stacking heavy tools on top (this can misalign blades).

A small but important additional point is avoiding “tip-to-tip contact” with other instruments during transport and reprocessing. Unprotected contact can nick edges and blunt tips, degrading cutting quality even when sterilization is otherwise correct.

How do I keep the patient safe?

Safety practices and monitoring (what matters with a “simple” instrument)

Episiotomy scissors are a mechanical tool, but patient safety depends on more than mechanics. Key safety practices commonly include:

Ensuring the instrument is sterile and appropriately reprocessed
Using a sharp, aligned instrument to reduce unnecessary tissue trauma
Maintaining situational awareness during use, including careful instrument control
Confirming that the overall procedure workflow includes appropriate supervision, staffing, and readiness for escalation per local protocols

Clinical monitoring (for example, bleeding assessment, pain management, and postpartum observation) is determined by local clinical protocols and is outside the scope of this informational overview.

It is also worth noting that instrument quality can affect the feel of the procedure for both clinician and patient. Excessive force from dull or gapped blades can increase tissue handling and prolong the time needed for repair. While many factors influence outcomes, ensuring instruments are functional is a straightforward, controllable safety measure.

“Alarm handling” and human factors (there are no beeps, but there are warning signs)

Episiotomy scissors do not generate alarms. Instead, the team relies on human factors and tactile/visual cues:

Unusual resistance or “crunchy” feel may indicate dullness, misalignment, or inappropriate use.
Ragged tissue edges can be a sign of poor blade condition or technique issues.
Loose hinge movement, blade wobble, or tip deformity are signs to stop and replace the instrument.

Human factors that support safety include adequate lighting, clear role assignment, minimizing distractions, and using standardized instrument trays so staff can anticipate what is available and where it is placed.

Other “quiet warnings” teams sometimes notice include:

Squeaking at the hinge, which may suggest inadequate lubrication (or residue in the joint) and warrants inspection after the case.
Visible discoloration near the pivot, which can indicate repeated exposure to moisture or chemicals and may precede corrosion.
Asymmetric blade wear, where one blade appears more scratched or dulled, sometimes linked to improper sharpening or repeated misuse.

Risk controls that hospitals can implement

Hospitals can reduce risk through controls that are practical and auditable:

Standardize Episiotomy scissors patterns across units to simplify training and set assembly.
Implement pre-use functional checks as a routine habit.
Use instrument tracking (set-level at minimum) to identify repeated failures and repair needs.
Create clear criteria for removing instruments from service (rust, pitting, loose joints, failed sharpness tests).
Ensure backup instruments are available in high-volume areas to prevent delays when a set fails.

Additional system-level controls often include:

Incoming inspection on delivery (checking alignment, finish, and basic function before the instrument ever enters circulation).
Periodic preventive maintenance cycles, where trays are pulled for inspection and sharpening on a scheduled basis rather than only when failures are reported.
Standard work for set assembly, ensuring the same scissor pattern appears in the same location in every tray to reduce cognitive load during urgent cases.

Labeling checks and documentation culture

Even for basic surgical instruments, safety benefits from consistent documentation habits:

Verify sterile pack indicators and integrity.
Confirm correct set and correct tool to avoid last-minute substitutions.
Document instrument failures and near misses; small problems (dullness, corrosion) often predict larger process failures later.
Encourage a non-punitive incident reporting culture so staff escalate issues early.

Where instrument tracking is mature, documenting “minor” problems can reveal patterns—such as a specific tray repeatedly returning with staining, or a particular vendor batch that dulls faster than expected—allowing corrective action before failures reach the bedside.

How do I interpret the output?

Types of outputs (what “output” means for scissors)

Episiotomy scissors do not produce numerical readings. The “output” is the physical result and the process signals around safe use:

The quality of the cut (smooth vs ragged edges)
The amount of force required to cut (subjective but informative)
The condition of the instrument after use (new damage, sticking, contamination)
Sterility and process indicators (pack integrity, chemical indicators, count verification)

For operations teams, “output” also includes instrument tracking data: frequency of repair, turnaround time, and set failure rates.

In quality improvement terms, you can think of output at two levels:

Clinical-level output: Does the instrument perform predictably in the clinician’s hand?
System-level output: Does the instrument program reliably deliver a sharp, sterile device every time it is needed?

How clinicians typically interpret results

In routine practice, clinicians interpret whether:

The instrument cut cleanly and predictably.
The incision/trim appears controlled rather than torn or crushed.
The scissors remained easy to control (no unexpected slip, no hinge failure).

Interpretation is always contextual: tissue condition, urgency, and technique all influence the observed result.

Some clinicians also use “effort cues” to interpret instrument condition. If they find themselves needing multiple short snips where a smooth continuous cut would normally suffice, it can be a sign the scissors are dull or misaligned. This kind of observation is valuable feedback for sterile processing and repair programs.

Common pitfalls and limitations

Pitfalls that can distort interpretation include:

Attributing tissue tearing solely to the instrument when other factors may contribute.
Continuing to use scissors that “kind of work,” which can increase tissue trauma and delay.
Using Episiotomy scissors for non-intended tasks (cutting sutures, drapes, packaging), which dulls blades and increases contamination risk.
Confusing “looks clean” with “is sterile”; sterility depends on validated reprocessing and packaging integrity, not appearance.

The practical takeaway is to interpret the physical output alongside process checks (sterility confirmation, instrument function tests, and documentation).

What if something goes wrong?

Troubleshooting checklist (fast, bedside-friendly)

If Episiotomy scissors are not performing as expected, a practical checklist is:

Is the sterile pack intact, dry, and with expected indicator change?
Are the blades aligned and meeting evenly at the tips?
Does the hinge open and close smoothly without grinding?
Is there visible rust, pitting, staining, or debris near the joint?
Are the tips bent, chipped, or rough (especially on blunt-tip designs)?
Were the scissors used for something outside their intended purpose?
Were the scissors dropped or contaminated during the procedure?

If the answer to any safety-critical question is “yes” (sterility concern, damage, malfunction), replacement is typically safer than attempting to “make it work.”

A common real-world scenario is accidental contamination (for example, the scissors touch a non-sterile surface or fall). In many protocols, the response is straightforward: remove from the sterile field, replace with a sterile instrument, and handle the contaminated scissor according to exposure and reprocessing policies.

When to stop use

General stop-use triggers include:

Any concern about sterility or contamination
Mechanical failure (sticking, loose hinge, blade separation)
Visible damage (chips, cracks, bent tips)
Inability to cut smoothly without excessive force
A sharps injury or near miss involving the instrument (follow local exposure protocols)

Facilities should define clear criteria in policy so frontline staff do not have to negotiate whether a questionable instrument stays in service.

When to escalate to SPD, biomedical engineering, or the manufacturer

Escalation pathways vary, but common patterns are:

SPD/CSSD: inspection, removal from circulation, reprocessing failures, repeated staining/rust, and set assembly issues.
Instrument repair service (in-house or outsourced): sharpening, hinge adjustment, blade realignment, refurbishment, or condemnation.
Biomedical engineering: may support incident investigation systems and asset tracking integration; involvement varies.
Manufacturer or vendor: warranty questions, material/finish issues, IFU clarification, and quality complaints.

If patient harm occurred or a serious near miss was identified, escalation typically also includes the facility’s risk management and quality teams, following local reporting requirements.

For vendor escalation, useful supporting details often include the set name, purchase order references, packaging lot information (if available), and clear photos of defects (taken per facility policy). Preserving the instrument “as found” can help determine whether the issue is due to manufacturing, reprocessing, transport damage, or misuse.

Documentation and safety reporting expectations (general)

A reliable documentation approach helps prevent recurrence:

Record the instrument set ID (and instrument ID if available), date/time, and clinical location.
Describe the failure mode (dull, stiff, loose, rusted, packaging issue).
Note immediate actions (replaced instrument, removed set from service).
File an incident report per facility policy for defects, sterility breaches, or injuries.
Preserve the instrument for investigation when needed (do not reintroduce it into circulation).

Infection control and cleaning of Episiotomy scissors

Cleaning principles (why technique matters)

Episiotomy scissors contact tissue and are exposed to blood and body fluids, so they require consistent, validated reprocessing. For reusable instruments, cleaning is not optional; it is the step that makes sterilization possible. If soil remains in the hinge or on blade surfaces, sterilization may be compromised.

Key principles include:

Remove soil early (before it dries).
Keep the hinge open during cleaning so solutions reach joint surfaces.
Use the correct chemistry (detergent type, dilution, contact time) per facility policy and manufacturer IFU.

An often-overlooked principle is protecting the instrument from corrosion during the hours between use and full decontamination. Prolonged exposure to blood, saline, or harsh chemicals can lead to staining, pitting, and hinge degradation. Many facilities use approved moistening products or damp towels to prevent bioburden from drying while avoiding practices that promote rust.

Disinfection vs sterilization (general)

These terms are often confused:

Cleaning: physical removal of visible soil and organic material.
Disinfection: reduction of microorganisms to a safer level; not necessarily effective against all spores.
Sterilization: elimination of all forms of microbial life; required for instruments that contact sterile tissue.

Episiotomy scissors are generally treated as critical instruments that require sterilization when reusable. The exact reprocessing method (steam vs low-temperature) varies by manufacturer materials and local resources.

Many infection prevention frameworks also reference the Spaulding classification, where instruments that enter sterile tissue are “critical” and require sterilization. While the classification is a conceptual tool, it reinforces why “high-level disinfection” is not typically considered adequate for reusable episiotomy scissors in most settings.

High-touch and high-risk points on Episiotomy scissors

Areas that commonly trap soil or fail inspection include:

The hinge/box lock and screw joint
The inner blade surfaces near the pivot
Serrations or micro-serrations (if present; varies by manufacturer)
The tip area (including blunt tip contours)
Finger rings and handle grooves where gloves and fluids contact repeatedly

Focusing inspection on these points reduces the chance of “looks clean” instruments that still harbor residue.

For screw-joint designs, the screw head and threads can also trap debris. Facilities may have specific policies on whether such instruments require disassembly for periodic deep cleaning, depending on the instrument design and manufacturer IFU.

Example cleaning workflow (non-brand-specific)

Always follow the manufacturer IFU and local infection prevention policy. A typical workflow for reusable Episiotomy scissors may look like:

Point-of-use: remove gross soil with a damp wipe; keep instruments moist per policy (avoid practices that promote corrosion).
Transport: move in a closed, labeled container to decontamination to protect staff and environment.
Decontamination cleaning: open scissors; apply enzymatic or approved detergent; brush hinge and blades; rinse thoroughly.
Mechanical cleaning: use ultrasonic cleaning or washer-disinfector cycles if validated for the instrument type and facility equipment.
Drying: dry completely, including the hinge, to reduce corrosion risk.
Inspection and function test: check alignment, sharpness, smooth motion, and tip integrity under adequate light/magnification.
Lubrication: apply water-soluble instrument lubricant if used by the facility (type and use vary).
Packaging: protect tips/blades as needed; package in wrap or pouch with indicators and correct labeling.
Sterilization: process per validated cycle; document load parameters and indicator results.
Storage and distribution: store in a clean, dry area; protect packaging integrity during transport back to clinical areas.

Additional details that can improve reliability include using appropriate water quality (where applicable), ensuring instruments are not closed during sterilization (steam penetration is typically improved when hinged instruments are opened), and using tip guards to prevent edge damage inside trays.

Special considerations (single-use vs reusable)

Single-use Episiotomy scissors: should be disposed of according to regulated medical waste and sharps policies; reprocessing is not appropriate unless explicitly supported by validated manufacturer instructions and allowed by local regulation (varies by manufacturer and jurisdiction).
Reusable Episiotomy scissors: require an ongoing maintenance plan (sharpness testing, repair/refurbishment, replacement criteria), not just cleaning.

From a sustainability and cost perspective, facilities often compare single-use and reusable programs using total cost of ownership. Reusable scissors may be economical over time if the facility has reliable decontamination capacity and sharpening services. Single-use scissors can reduce reprocessing burden but increase waste volume and create dependency on continuous supply and consistent quality.

Medical Device Companies & OEMs

Manufacturer vs OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer)

A manufacturer is the company that markets the product under its name and is typically responsible for regulatory compliance, labeling, complaint handling, and providing the IFU. An OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) is a company that produces devices (or components) that may be sold under another company’s brand.

In surgical instruments, OEM relationships can affect:

Traceability and documentation (who to contact for quality complaints)
Consistency across batches (materials, finishing, hardness, edge retention)
Availability of service and spare parts
Warranty terms and responsibilities in the event of defects or recalls

For procurement teams, understanding whether a branded product is OEM-sourced helps evaluate risk, continuity of supply, and long-term support.

In many jurisdictions, instrument manufacturers operate under quality management requirements (often aligned to internationally recognized standards), and the “legal manufacturer” named on labeling carries responsibility for post-market surveillance and complaint handling. This distinction matters when a hospital needs rapid answers about IFU details, compatibility with certain sterilization methods, or material composition (for example, for facilities managing nickel sensitivity considerations).

Top 5 World Best Medical Device Companies / Manufacturers

The companies below are example industry leaders (not a ranking). Product availability for Episiotomy scissors specifically varies by manufacturer, region, and distributor.

Johnson & Johnson (operating companies vary by region)
Known globally for a broad healthcare footprint spanning medical devices, pharmaceuticals, and consumer health categories (structure varies over time). In medical devices, its portfolio is often associated with surgery and orthopedics through well-known operating brands. Global reach is strong, but exact offerings and availability vary by country and channel.
Medtronic
A large global medtech manufacturer with a portfolio focused on implantable and interventional therapies, including cardiovascular, neuroscience, diabetes, and surgical technologies. It is widely present across major hospital markets with structured service and training programs. Specific coverage of manual surgical instruments varies by region and product line.
B. Braun
A global healthcare company with strong presence in hospital consumables, infusion therapy, and surgical products, including instrument and sterile processing-related categories in some markets. Many facilities recognize B. Braun for products that touch both clinical care and hospital operations. Product range and branding can vary by region.
BD (Becton, Dickinson and Company)
BD is widely recognized for medical supplies, medication management technologies, and laboratory products. Its portfolio is commonly embedded in daily hospital workflows, particularly around safety-engineered devices and infection prevention-adjacent categories. Manual surgical instrument coverage varies by market segment.
Stryker
Known internationally for orthopedic, surgical, and acute care equipment, often with strong integration into operating room workflows. Stryker’s footprint includes capital equipment and supporting service models in many countries. Availability of specific manual instruments depends on local catalogs and distribution agreements.

Many episiotomy scissors in circulation globally are also produced by specialized surgical instrument manufacturers (including companies focused almost entirely on stainless-steel instruments). These specialist firms may not be as widely recognized as large medtech conglomerates, but they often provide the core reusable instruments used across obstetrics and general surgery. For hospitals, the key is not the size of the corporate brand but the consistency of specifications, validated IFU compatibility, and the reliability of distribution and after-sales support.

Vendors, Suppliers, and Distributors

What’s the difference between a vendor, supplier, and distributor?

These terms are sometimes used interchangeably, but they can mean different roles operationally:

A vendor is any entity that sells goods to a healthcare organization (could be a manufacturer, distributor, or reseller).
A supplier emphasizes the ability to provide a product consistently, including sourcing, inventory, and fulfillment.
A distributor focuses on logistics: warehousing, order fulfillment, delivery, returns, and sometimes local regulatory documentation support.

In many countries, hospitals purchase Episiotomy scissors through distributors or local agents who bundle instruments into obstetric sets and coordinate service, sharpening, and replacements.

Beyond logistics, distributors can also influence standardization by determining which brands are readily available with short lead times. In remote or resource-variable regions, the “best” product for a hospital may be the one that can be reliably supplied with predictable specifications and compatible reprocessing guidance—not the one with the highest catalog price point.

Top 5 World Best Vendors / Suppliers / Distributors

The organizations below are example global distributors (not a ranking). Availability and geographic coverage vary significantly by country.

McKesson
A major healthcare distribution and services organization with strong presence in the United States. It commonly supports hospitals and health systems with supply chain services, inventory programs, and broad product catalogs. International availability varies by business unit and region.
Cardinal Health
Known for large-scale distribution of medical products and supply chain services, particularly in North America. Many hospitals interact with Cardinal Health through standardized procurement channels and logistics support. Service offerings and regional footprints vary by market.
Medline
A large supplier and manufacturer-distributor hybrid in many markets, often providing both branded and private-label medical equipment and consumables. Many facilities use Medline for standardized packs, gloves, drapes, and basic instruments depending on region. International distribution presence varies by country.
Henry Schein
Widely associated with healthcare distribution, particularly in dental and outpatient settings, and also present in broader medical supply channels in some regions. Depending on the market, it may serve clinics, ambulatory centers, and some hospitals. Product mix and service capability vary by geography.
Owens & Minor
A supply chain and distribution organization with a history of servicing hospitals, often in the United States and selected other markets. Services may include logistics, inventory management, and sourcing support. Regional availability and scope vary.

When evaluating distributors for instruments like episiotomy scissors, hospitals often consider additional factors such as consistency of packaging, ability to provide certificates or product documentation when required, support for returns/defect handling, and whether the distributor can coordinate sharpening/repair programs for reusable inventory.

Global Market Snapshot by Country

India: Demand for Episiotomy scissors is closely tied to high delivery volumes and expanding institutional childbirth, especially in public hospitals and private maternity centers. Procurement is often price-sensitive, with a mix of domestic sourcing and imports depending on quality requirements and tender rules. Urban hospitals may have stronger sterile processing capacity than smaller district facilities, affecting reuse vs single-use choices.
China: Large hospital systems and high procedure volumes support a broad market for obstetric instruments, including Episiotomy scissors, with significant domestic manufacturing capacity. Purchasing is often influenced by centralized procurement policies and hospital tiering, with quality expectations rising in tertiary centers. Rural access can depend on regional distribution strength and training infrastructure.
United States: Demand is shaped by standardized labor and delivery trays, strict infection prevention expectations, and robust sterile processing programs. Hospitals often purchase through group purchasing and distribution networks, and they may balance reusable instruments with single-use options based on policy and cost-of-ownership analysis. Repair and sharpening services are widely available, supporting long instrument lifecycles when managed well.
Indonesia: As an archipelago, distribution logistics can strongly influence availability of basic hospital equipment such as Episiotomy scissors, particularly outside major urban centers. Many facilities rely on imports or centralized purchasing, and reprocessing capacity can vary widely between tertiary hospitals and smaller clinics. Training and standardization programs can be major demand drivers for consistent instrument sets.
Pakistan: Pakistan has a notable footprint in stainless-steel surgical instrument manufacturing, alongside a large domestic healthcare market that purchases across a wide quality spectrum. Hospitals may source Episiotomy scissors locally or through import channels, with procurement often balancing cost, consistency, and documentation needs. Service ecosystems for sharpening and repair vary by region and facility type.
Nigeria: Demand is driven by maternal health service expansion, increasing facility deliveries in urban areas, and donor-supported programs in some regions. Import dependence can be significant for consistent-quality instruments, while supply chain disruptions may affect availability in rural facilities. Reprocessing capacity and access to instrument maintenance services are uneven, influencing whether facilities prefer reusable or single-use options.
Brazil: Brazil’s mixed public-private health system creates multiple purchasing pathways for Episiotomy scissors, from large public tenders to private hospital standardization programs. Domestic manufacturing exists for some medical equipment, alongside imports for specific quality or branding requirements. Urban centers often have mature sterile processing services, while smaller facilities may face maintenance and logistics constraints.
Bangladesh: High delivery volumes and ongoing investment in maternal and neonatal health services support steady demand for basic obstetric instruments. Many facilities depend on imports or distributor-supplied sets, and procurement decisions can be influenced by donor programs and public tender requirements. Rural access is closely linked to distribution reach and reprocessing capability at district levels.
Russia: Market dynamics are influenced by procurement policies, local manufacturing initiatives, and changing access to imported medical equipment. Hospitals may seek standardized instrument sets with dependable supply and documentation, particularly in large cities. Service and maintenance ecosystems for reusable instruments vary by region and can influence replacement cycles.
Mexico: Demand is supported by a large network of public hospitals and private maternity services, with purchasing occurring through both centralized and facility-level channels. Imports remain important for many device categories, while local distribution networks affect availability and after-sales support. Differences between urban tertiary hospitals and rural clinics can be pronounced in reprocessing resources.
Ethiopia: Expanding maternal health programs and facility-based delivery initiatives drive demand for essential obstetric instruments, including Episiotomy scissors. Import dependence is common, and supply chain resilience and training support are important determinants of sustained availability. Reprocessing capacity and instrument maintenance services are still developing in many areas, especially outside major cities.
Japan: Japan’s market emphasizes quality standards, consistent reprocessing, and well-developed hospital operations. Lower birth volumes compared with some countries may shift demand toward durable, reusable instrument programs with strong maintenance practices. Purchasing tends to prioritize traceability and supplier reliability, with distribution and service networks generally well established.
Philippines: Demand reflects a mix of public hospital needs and private maternity care, with distribution geography shaping access across islands. Many facilities rely on distributors for instrument sets and may face variability in sterile processing resources. Training and standardization initiatives can increase demand for consistent patterns and dependable supply.
Egypt: Egypt’s large population and substantial public health infrastructure support ongoing demand for obstetric instruments and consumables. Procurement often balances cost with durability, and many facilities depend on distributor channels for both instruments and reprocessing supplies. Differences between major urban hospitals and smaller facilities influence replacement and maintenance strategies.
Democratic Republic of the Congo: Demand is driven by essential obstetric care needs, but access is strongly constrained by logistics, funding, and infrastructure. Import dependence and limited sterile processing capacity in many areas can affect whether reusable instruments are practical at scale. Where services expand, bundled kits and training support often shape procurement decisions.
Vietnam: Vietnam’s growing hospital sector and expanding manufacturing base influence the availability of basic surgical instruments, including Episiotomy scissors. Facilities may use a mix of domestic products and imports, depending on procurement standards and clinical preferences. Urban centers typically have stronger reprocessing services, while smaller provincial facilities may face gaps in maintenance support.
Iran: Market conditions are shaped by domestic production capacity, import constraints, and evolving procurement pathways. Hospitals may prioritize locally available instruments and build maintenance programs to extend reusable equipment lifecycles. Availability of specific brands and supporting documentation can vary depending on supply chain and regulatory conditions.
Turkey: Turkey has an active medical manufacturing and distribution environment, with both domestic sourcing and export-oriented supply chains. Hospitals often procure standardized instrument sets, and private sector growth can support higher specification purchasing in some regions. Service networks for maintenance and reprocessing are generally more accessible in urban centers.
Germany: Germany’s market is influenced by strong regulatory and quality expectations, mature sterile processing systems, and a well-established medical technology ecosystem. Hospitals typically emphasize validated reprocessing, documentation, and consistent instrument quality over long lifecycles. Procurement may focus on standardization, service support, and traceability.
Thailand: Demand is shaped by public hospital networks, a growing private sector, and regional referral centers with advanced maternity services. Distribution and service availability are strongest in urban areas and medical tourism hubs, with more variability in smaller facilities. Procurement decisions often weigh reusable instrument programs against workload and reprocessing capacity.
United Kingdom: Demand is influenced by standardized maternity care pathways and strong governance around clinical documentation and infection prevention. Many facilities rely on consistent tray configurations and validated sterilization processes, with purchasing often centralized. Selective use approaches still require reliable availability because urgent cases can occur at any time.
South Africa: A mixed public-private system creates varied purchasing environments, from large public tenders to private hospital group standardization. Distribution reach and service capability differ by province, and facilities often balance durable reusable programs with supply chain reliability. Training initiatives and staffing models (midwife-led vs obstetrician-led care) can also influence set design.
Saudi Arabia: Many hospitals, particularly larger urban centers, procure instruments through established distributor networks with strong emphasis on documentation and consistent specifications. Imports are common, and facilities often prioritize compatibility with existing sterilization infrastructure and service agreements. Smaller facilities may focus on standardized, easily replenished instrument sets to maintain readiness.
Australia: Demand typically reflects mature sterile processing practices, strong emphasis on traceability, and standardized obstetric trays in many hospitals. Facilities may prioritize durable instruments with predictable maintenance cycles, supported by established repair and sharpening services. Procurement often considers lifecycle cost and consistency across multiple sites.
France: Purchasing is influenced by hospital system structures and procurement frameworks that emphasize quality and validated reprocessing. Facilities often focus on standard instrument patterns to support training and cross-coverage staffing. As in many European settings, robust sterile processing capacity supports long-term reusable instrument programs.

Key Takeaways and Practical Checklist for Episiotomy scissors

Treat Episiotomy scissors as a critical sharp, not a general-purpose scissor.
Standardize one or two Episiotomy scissors patterns per facility to reduce variability.
Verify sterile pack integrity and indicator status before opening the set.
Do a quick open-close test to check smooth motion and hinge stability.
Inspect tips and blades for bending, chips, corrosion, or staining.
Replace the instrument immediately if sterility or integrity is uncertain.
Keep blades closed when moving or passing Episiotomy scissors.
Use a consistent sharps-passing method and announce “sharp” when passing.
Maintain a designated safe zone on the sterile tray for sharps placement.
Avoid using Episiotomy scissors to cut sutures, dressings, or packaging.
Dull scissors increase force requirements and can worsen tissue handling.
Reusable Episiotomy scissors need planned sharpening and repair pathways.
Build backup inventory so a defective set does not delay care.
Train staff to recognize common failure modes like loose joints and misalignment.
Tag and remove defective instruments from circulation; do not “send it anyway.”
Document instrument defects with set ID and location for trend analysis.
Align procurement specs with your actual washer and sterilizer capabilities.
Confirm manufacturer IFU compatibility with your sterilization method and packaging.
Focus reprocessing attention on the hinge/box lock where soil can persist.
Keep instruments moist at point-of-use per policy to prevent dried bioburden.
Use validated detergents and correct brush sizes for hinge and blade surfaces.
Dry thoroughly after cleaning to reduce corrosion and staining risks.
Inspect under adequate lighting; magnification can improve defect detection.
Use tip guards or protective packaging to prevent damage during sterilization.
Track set completeness to prevent missing-instrument events on L&D.
Define clear stop-use criteria in policy for rust, pitting, and mechanical issues.
Ensure incident reporting pathways include sterile processing and risk management.
Evaluate vendors on consistency, documentation, and after-sales support, not price alone.
Clarify whether a product is OEM-made and how quality accountability is assigned.
Consider total cost of ownership, including repairs, downtime, and replacement rates.
Match instrument standardization with training curricula for students and residents.
Audit reprocessing outcomes regularly and provide feedback to frontline teams.
Plan distribution and restocking to support 24/7 readiness on labor and delivery.
Use procurement contracts that support continuity of supply and predictable specifications.
Keep episiotomy scissors protected during transport and storage to prevent edge nicks and tip deformation.
Encourage frontline staff to report “minor” issues (stiffness, squeaking, staining) early before failures occur during urgent care.

If you are looking for contributions and suggestion for this content please drop an email to contact@myhospitalnow.com

Find Trusted Cardiac Hospitals

Compare heart hospitals by city and services — all in one place.

Explore Hospitals

Ready for a New You? Start with the Right Hospital.