Traction table: Overview, Uses and Top Manufacturer Company

Introduction

Traction table is specialized hospital equipment used to position and apply controlled pulling forces (traction) to a patient’s limb—most commonly the lower extremity—during orthopedic procedures. In many operating rooms (ORs), it is a core piece of medical equipment for fracture reduction and fixation workflows that rely on stable limb alignment and intraoperative imaging. You may also hear it referred to as a fracture table or orthopedic traction table, and in some facilities it is implemented as a dedicated orthopedic table while in others it is an operating table combined with traction accessories.

Why it matters: a Traction table can help a surgical team maintain consistent traction and positioning without continuous manual holding. That can support workflow efficiency, imaging access (for example, with fluoroscopy), and predictable setup—while also introducing specific safety risks (pressure injury, nerve compression, falls, equipment malfunction) that require disciplined checks and monitoring. Because the device physically transmits force through boots, straps, posts, and clamps, small setup errors can translate into significant pressure or shear at the patient interface; many teams treat traction positioning as a “high-reliability” step that deserves the same rigor as implant verification and electrosurgical safety checks.

This article explains what a Traction table is, when it is typically used, what to prepare before use, basic operation concepts, safety practices, how to “interpret the output” (what the device indicates and what it does not), troubleshooting, infection prevention considerations, and a practical global market overview for administrators, biomedical engineers, and procurement teams. It is informational only and not a substitute for local policy, manufacturer Instructions for Use (IFU), or clinical supervision. Terminology and workflows also vary by region and specialty; always defer to the specific model’s IFU and your facility’s positioning and imaging protocols.

What is Traction table and why do we use it?

A Traction table is a clinical device designed to help a care team apply and maintain traction and limb positioning in a controlled, repeatable way—typically during orthopedic trauma surgery and certain hip procedures. Depending on the model, it may be a dedicated orthopedic table or an operating table with traction accessories. In either case, it is best thought of as a force-and-position management system: it stabilizes the patient, transmits traction through a limb fixation interface, and provides controlled adjustments that can be locked and maintained while the procedure proceeds.

Core purpose (plain-language definition)

• Traction: a pulling force applied along the length of a limb to help align bones and joints.
• Counter-traction: an opposing force that prevents the rest of the body from sliding, often achieved through a padded perineal post or other support (varies by manufacturer and technique).
• Positioning: the ability to adjust limb rotation, abduction/adduction (movement away from/toward the midline), flexion/extension, and height relative to the surgical field and imaging equipment.

In practice, a Traction table provides a stable mechanical “holding” system so the team can maintain alignment and access while performing a procedure. It can also support sustained distraction (for example, to open a joint space) or maintain limb length and rotation while instrumentation and imaging checks are repeated.

Common clinical settings

Traction table is most commonly encountered in:

• Operating rooms in hospitals with orthopedic trauma services
• Ambulatory surgery centers performing selected orthopedic procedures (capability varies by facility)
• Teaching hospitals where trainees learn surgical positioning, imaging workflows, and safety checks
• Procedure rooms are less common; use depends on local infrastructure and imaging access

In some systems, traction-capable setups are also found in hybrid ORs or high-throughput trauma theaters where imaging access and consistent reduction workflows are prioritized. Resource-limited environments may rely on simpler mechanical traction frames or adapted accessories, which can increase the importance of clear accessory control and maintenance discipline.

Key benefits for patient care and workflow (general)

Benefits depend on procedure and local practice, but commonly include:

• More consistent positioning over time compared with continuous manual traction
• Improved access for imaging (for example, clearance for a mobile fluoroscopy unit, often called a C‑arm)
• Fewer hands needed for holding traction, allowing staff to focus on sterile setup, instrument flow, and monitoring
• Repeatability when using standardized setups and checklists
• Ergonomic advantages for staff by reducing sustained manual force (varies by case and technique)

Additional practical benefits that some teams value include improved reproducibility of limb rotation (helpful when repeated images are needed), less variability between assistants, and the ability to hold a reduction while the team pauses for imaging, implant checks, or re-draping. In some facilities, better positioning stability can also reduce unplanned interruptions and collisions when the C‑arm is moved around the patient.

How it functions (mechanism of action, non-brand-specific)

A typical Traction table system includes:

• Table base and tabletop (often radiolucent in key regions to support imaging)
• Traction assembly with a limb “spars” or extension arms
• Foot/ankle fixation such as a traction boot or stirrup to transmit traction to the limb
• Counter-traction support (commonly a padded post; alternatives exist in some workflows)
• Controls that may be manual (cranks, levers) or powered (motorized adjustments), depending on manufacturer

Traction is applied gradually using the table’s mechanism, and limb position can be adjusted in multiple planes. Locks, pins, and clamps are used to secure the final position.

In many designs, traction is generated by a screw, ratchet, or winch-like mechanism that converts hand force (or motor output) into controlled linear pull. Rotation and abduction/adduction are often adjusted at the footpiece or spar junction, with separate locks for each axis. Some systems use modular components that can be swapped (different spars, boots, posts) to match patient size, planned imaging views, or surgeon preference—making accessory compatibility and correct assembly especially important.

Common variants you may encounter (terminology and design)

While “Traction table” is used here as a generic term, in practice there are several common configurations:

• Dedicated orthopedic/fracture tables designed primarily for traction-based lower-extremity work, often with optimized radiolucency around the hip and femur region.
• General operating tables with traction attachments, where the core table is a multipurpose OR table and the traction unit is an accessory set installed as needed.
• Specialty hip-positioning systems that emphasize rapid setup, imaging clearance, and repeatable limb manipulation; some are optimized for specific approaches or service lines.
• Post-based vs. postless counter-traction concepts, depending on technique and equipment availability; counter-traction strategies are highly protocol- and surgeon-dependent.

Knowing which type your facility uses matters because it affects storage, reprocessing, preventive maintenance tasks, and how quickly a team can safely deploy the setup in an urgent case.

How medical students and trainees encounter it

Learners usually meet Traction table during:

• Orthopedic surgery rotations, especially hip fracture fixation and femoral procedures
• OR orientation on patient positioning, pressure injury prevention, and intraoperative imaging
• Simulation sessions focusing on setup, sterile field awareness, and team communication
• Safety teaching related to traction complications (pressure, nerve compression, slippage) and “stop the line” culture

For trainees, the key learning objective is not just “how to set it up,” but how to recognize hazards early and work within supervision and local policy. Many training programs also emphasize role clarity—who is allowed to adjust traction, who documents changes, and how to communicate with anesthesia and radiology when the limb is moved—because traction changes can affect both patient physiology and the sterile field.

When should I use Traction table (and when should I not)?

Use of Traction table is procedure- and patient-dependent. The device is selected when controlled traction and stable positioning are needed and when the benefits outweigh the risks and setup complexity. In many hospitals, it is chosen specifically when reduction quality and imaging access are critical and would otherwise require continuous manual force.

Appropriate use cases (examples, not exhaustive)

Under qualified clinical supervision and local protocol, Traction table is often considered for:

• Orthopedic trauma fixation where traction assists reduction and imaging-guided alignment (common in proximal femur and femoral shaft workflows in many centers)
• Procedures requiring controlled limb rotation and length maintenance during instrumentation
• Hip procedures that may require joint distraction and consistent positioning (technique and table type vary by manufacturer and surgical approach)
• Teaching settings where standardized positioning supports reproducible learning and team coordination

Exact indications vary by institution, surgeon preference, and available equipment.

In addition, some facilities use traction-capable setups to support workflows where repeated fluoroscopic checks are expected and stable limb positioning reduces image variability. In certain practice settings, traction tables may be used to facilitate closed or minimally invasive reduction maneuvers before definitive fixation, helping maintain alignment while implants or instruments are introduced.

Situations where it may not be suitable (general)

A Traction table may be less suitable when:

• The limb cannot be safely secured (for example, due to wounds, external fixators, casts, or anatomy that prevents secure boot placement)
• Counter-traction methods are contraindicated or impractical (for example, concerns about pressure in the perineal region; the suitability of alternatives varies by manufacturer and technique)
• The procedure requires a different patient position that conflicts with the traction assembly (e.g., certain lateral or prone workflows)
• Imaging access is compromised due to table geometry, OR size, or incompatible accessories
• Patient weight, size, or body habitus exceeds safe operating limits (table and accessory limits vary by manufacturer)
• Time-critical scenarios where setup would delay urgent care and an alternate approach is preferred by the clinical team

Other practical “not suitable” scenarios can be operational rather than clinical—for example, when the correct traction boots are unavailable in the needed size, when key components (pins, clamps, post padding) are missing, or when the OR layout makes safe C‑arm movement unrealistic. In these cases, teams may use alternative positioning methods that better match the available resources and safety constraints.

Safety cautions and contraindications (non-clinical, general)

Because this is a medical device that transmits force to a patient, common risk themes include:

• Pressure injury risk from posts, straps, pads, and bony prominences
• Nerve compression or stretch risk from prolonged traction or malposition (clinical assessment is required)
• Skin injury risk from shear, slippage, or poorly fitted boots
• Falls and transfer risk during positioning and post-procedure transfer
• Mechanical failure risk if locks, pins, or clamps are not fully engaged
• Radiation exposure risk due to frequent use with fluoroscopy

Contraindications are clinical and depend on patient condition and procedure. Clinical judgment, supervision, and local protocols should guide decisions, and trainees should not initiate use independently. From a device-safety perspective, an important “soft contraindication” is any situation where staff are not adequately trained on the specific model or where the team cannot maintain line-of-sight monitoring of high-risk contact points after draping.

What do I need before starting?

Safe use of Traction table is as much about preparation and system readiness as it is about intraoperative technique. High-quality outcomes are strongly linked to standardized setup, accessory readiness, and clear team roles before traction is ever applied.

Required environment and setup considerations

Common prerequisites include:

• Adequate OR space for the table, traction assemblies, staff movement, and imaging equipment
• Imaging compatibility (often radiolucent sections and clearance for a C‑arm); verify with the planned procedure positioning
• Stable flooring and brakes to reduce unintended movement
• Power availability if the system has powered functions (battery status and cable routing matter)
• Clear emergency egress and access to anesthesia equipment and airway

It is also useful to confirm the pathway for patient transfer (from stretcher to table and from table to bed) and whether patient-handling aids (slide boards, air-assisted devices, extra staff) are planned. Traction tables can have extensions and spars that change the “footprint” of the setup; confirming door clearances and movement routes helps avoid rushed adjustments later.

Typical accessories and consumables

Depending on the model and procedure, you may need:

• Traction boots/stirrups in appropriate sizes
• Perineal post and padding (or approved alternative counter-traction setup)
• Straps and safety belts
• Side rails and clamps
• Radiolucent limb supports or spar extensions
• Replacement pads, liners, or disposable covers (varies by facility policy)
• Positioning aids for arms, head, and pressure points
• Tools for assembly and locking (if required by manufacturer)

Accessory compatibility is a frequent failure point in real-world operations; mixing parts across vendors can create unsafe fits or void support (varies by manufacturer).

Additional items that some teams keep available include spare boot liners (to manage moisture and reduce slippage), extra padding for bony prominences, and a clearly labeled bin for small hardware (pins, clips, set screws) that are easy to misplace during room turnover. In facilities with strict infection-prevention protocols, disposable barriers or covers may be used for high-touch levers and hand controls, provided they do not interfere with safe operation.

Training and competency expectations

Facilities commonly expect role-based competency, such as:

• Surgeons/proceduralists: procedure selection, traction strategy, imaging workflow, and final responsibility for positioning decisions
• Anesthesia professionals: physiologic monitoring, positioning coordination, and vigilance for pressure-related issues
• OR nurses and surgical technologists: assembly, sterile field coordination, padding/strapping checks, documentation
• Radiology technologists: C‑arm positioning, radiation safety practices, collision avoidance
• Biomedical engineering/HTM (Healthcare Technology Management): commissioning, preventive maintenance, safety testing, repair coordination

Competency should be documented and refreshed, especially when staff rotate or when models change. Many facilities also include model-specific skills such as locating the emergency release, understanding which axes are powered vs. manual, and demonstrating how to verify lock engagement by both visual and tactile cues.

Pre-use checks and documentation (practical checklist items)

Before patient arrival or before positioning, teams commonly verify:

• Preventive maintenance status (sticker, log, and next due date)
• No visible damage: cracks, bent components, worn straps, missing pins
• Correct assembly: locks engaged, clamps tight, rails secure
• Functional checks: traction mechanism moves smoothly, releases predictably, and holds position
• Control checks for powered systems: hand control response, emergency stop behavior (if present), battery/charger status
• Cleanliness: no residual soil or damaged upholstery that cannot be disinfected properly
• Weight limits and accessory limits (table, extensions, and traction boots)
• Availability of backup positioning plan if the device fails mid-case

Documentation typically includes device identification, accessories used, and any issues encountered. Policies vary by facility.

Additional practical pre-use checks that reduce avoidable problems include confirming that the perineal post pad is intact and firmly secured, verifying that boot size is appropriate (too large increases slippage; too small increases pressure), and ensuring that adjustment levers return to a neutral position after use. If the table has removable sections (for example, perineal post mounts or radiolucent inserts), confirm they are seated fully and cannot rock or shift when lateral force is applied.

Operational prerequisites for administrators and engineers

From a hospital operations perspective, readiness includes:

• Commissioning and acceptance testing at delivery (fit-for-purpose, electrical safety where applicable, functional checks)
• Preventive maintenance plan and spare parts strategy
• Service support plan (in-house capability vs. vendor contract), including response time expectations
• User training plan aligned to turnover and service line growth
• Storage and transport workflow to prevent damage and lost components
• Cleaning and reprocessing policy aligned to infection prevention and manufacturer IFU
• Incident reporting pathway so near-misses and failures are captured and corrected

Administrators and HTM teams often add practical controls such as standardized labeling for accessory sets, periodic audits to ensure all parts are present, and defined replacement intervals for high-wear items (boots, straps, padding). For powered tables, battery health monitoring and charger management can be part of uptime planning.

Roles and responsibilities (who does what)

• Clinicians: decide whether Traction table is appropriate; direct traction/positioning goals; validate final setup
• OR team: assemble, pad, secure, and monitor according to protocol; document and communicate changes
• Biomedical engineering/HTM: keep the medical equipment safe and functional through maintenance, repairs, and safety checks
• Procurement/supply chain: ensure accessory availability, authorized sourcing, warranty/service terms, and lifecycle replacement planning

Clear ownership reduces “gray-zone” risk, especially for accessories that are easily misplaced. Facilities with multiple OR sites (or rotating staff) often benefit from explicitly assigning who checks accessory completeness after each case and who approves removal of equipment from service when defects are found.

How do I use it correctly (basic operation)?

Exact steps vary by model, procedure, and local policy. The workflow below describes common, broadly applicable concepts for Traction table use in an OR setting, emphasizing device handling and safety rather than clinical decision-making. Always coordinate with anesthesia and imaging personnel; limb movement can affect hemodynamics, airway access, and C‑arm clearance.

Basic step-by-step workflow (typical)

1. Team brief and plan
   Confirm procedure, laterality, imaging plan, and whether Traction table is required. Agree on who controls traction adjustments and who monitors pressure points.

2. Prepare the table and attachments
   Assemble the traction unit, spar extensions, and required supports. Verify the correct side configuration and confirm all locking pins/clamps are present and engaged.

3. Confirm imaging clearance
   Before the patient is on the table, simulate the C‑arm path and confirm no collisions with the traction assembly or perineal post.

4. Position padding and high-risk contact points
   Place padding on anticipated pressure areas and prepare the perineal post (or alternative counter-traction method) per facility protocol.

5. Patient transfer and initial alignment
   Use safe patient handling techniques. Center the patient and align the pelvis and torso to minimize unintended rotation when traction is applied.

6. Secure upper body and non-operative limb
   Apply safety straps as per policy. Position arms and head to protect nerves and prevent entanglement with moving table components.

7. Apply counter-traction support
   Place the counter-traction device (commonly a padded post) correctly, with careful attention to alignment and padding. The exact placement strategy is clinical and protocol-driven.

8. Apply traction boot/stirrup and secure fixation
   Fit the boot to the correct size and confirm straps are snug without twisting. Ensure the boot is seated so traction transmits predictably and does not slip.

9. Apply traction gradually and re-check
   Increase traction in small increments. After each adjustment, re-check limb alignment, boot security, and pressure points.

10. Adjust limb position as required
    Use the table’s adjustment mechanisms for rotation, abduction/adduction, and elevation. Lock each axis after adjustment.

11. Confirm stability before incision and imaging
    Verify locks, brakes, and clamps. Confirm the patient is stable and that the sterile field will not be compromised by future adjustments.

12. Intra-procedure monitoring and small adjustments
    Traction and position may be adjusted during the case. Communicate changes clearly, and re-check pressure points and security after any significant movement.

13. Controlled release at the end
    Release traction gradually according to protocol. Remove boots and supports carefully to avoid skin shear.

14. Post-procedure transfer and post-use checks
    Transfer the patient safely. Inspect the device for damage or contamination and report any malfunction or near-miss.

Practical additions many teams incorporate include a brief “drape-and-move rehearsal” before incision—confirming that expected traction adjustments can be performed without breaking sterility—and a check that patient lines (ECG leads, IV tubing, urinary catheter, warming devices) have slack and are routed away from moving joints and pinch points.

Setup and calibration (if relevant)

Many Traction tables are primarily mechanical and may not require “calibration” in the way monitoring devices do. However, practical checks still matter:

• If the system has a traction force indicator, confirm it is intact and returns to baseline; accuracy and calibration requirements vary by manufacturer.
• Confirm angle/position markings (if present) are readable and not obscured by wear.
• For powered systems, confirm control responsiveness and that movement stops when controls are released.

Some facilities also perform periodic engineering checks for drift or wear (for example, confirming that a traction mechanism holds position under load and does not “creep”). If the table has quick-release or emergency-release functions, teams often verify that staff know the location and that the mechanism is not obstructed by drapes or accessory mounts.

Typical “settings” and what they generally mean

Settings depend on design, but may include:

• Traction amount: the degree of pull applied through the traction mechanism (sometimes displayed; often inferred by alignment and imaging)
• Rotation: internal/external rotation adjustments at the foot/boot assembly
• Abduction/adduction: lateral positioning relative to the midline
• Table height and tilt: to optimize surgeon ergonomics and imaging access

These settings are not diagnostic outputs; they are mechanical configuration states that must be clinically validated. It is also important to confirm the units and reference points when any numeric indicators are present (for example, whether a force scale is in kilograms-force, pounds-force, or Newtons), and whether “zero” is defined with the boot attached or without load.

Universal steps that apply across models

• Confirm brakes and locks before applying traction
• Keep a clear verbal call-out culture when traction or rotation is changed
• Maintain line-of-sight to high-risk contact points (boot, post, bony prominences)
• Re-check after any C‑arm repositioning to prevent collision and drape disruption
• Stop and reassess if anything feels “forced,” unstable, or inconsistent with expected movement

A universal best practice is to avoid “stacking” adjustments without locking in between (for example, rotating and abducting while traction is increasing). Making one change at a time helps the team identify what caused a shift, slip, or unexpected resistance.

How do I keep the patient safe?

Traction table introduces predictable risk patterns. Safety depends on proactive prevention, continuous monitoring, and a team culture that treats positioning as a critical step—not a routine task. The highest-risk moments are typically transfer onto the table, initial traction application, major intraoperative repositioning, and traction release/transfer off the table, because those steps combine movement, changing forces, and potential distraction.

Major safety risks to plan for (general)

• Pressure injuries: from perineal posts, straps, boots, and table edges
• Nerve injury risk: from compression or prolonged stretch (clinical assessment is required)
• Skin tears and shear: during transfer, traction application, or boot removal
• Slippage: boot slip, patient migration, or loosening clamps
• Mechanical hazards: pinch points, sudden releases, unstable extensions
• Radiation exposure: frequent fluoroscopy use in many traction-assisted procedures
• Human factors errors: wrong-side setup, misread controls, incomplete locking, distraction

From a safety-engineering perspective, many of these risks cluster into three categories: patient-interface risk (pads/boots/posts), mechanical integrity risk (locks/clamps/structural stability), and workflow risk (communication, imaging movement, rushed setup). Effective prevention addresses all three rather than focusing only on traction force.

Practical safety practices (non-procedure-specific)

• Use a dedicated positioning checklist
  Include “locks engaged,” “padding confirmed,” “counter-traction positioned,” and “imaging clearance.”

• Protect pressure points deliberately
  Padding should be placed with intention, not as an afterthought. Pay attention to heel, malleoli, fibular head region, and perineal contact points.

• Limit unintended motion
  Confirm table brakes, confirm traction unit stability, and route cables and suction lines so they do not pull on the traction assembly.

• Assign a “positioning owner”
  One person (often a senior nurse/tech) tracks traction changes, lock states, and contact points while the surgeon focuses on the procedure.

• Communicate before every adjustment
  Use short call-outs such as “adding traction,” “releasing traction,” or “rotating limb,” so anesthesia and the sterile team are prepared.

Additional practical safety tactics include confirming that the non-operative limb is positioned and secured in a way that avoids collision with the C‑arm and that prevents inadvertent pressure on the heel or fibular head. Teams also often confirm that the perineal post is the correct diameter and that padding is not wrinkled or displaced, since folds can concentrate pressure.

Monitoring during use

Monitoring is protocol-driven and varies by case, but common elements include:

• Visual checks of boot fit and strap tension
• Skin checks where feasible (pre- and post-use inspections are common)
• Periodic reassessment after major imaging repositioning
• Documentation of notable adjustments and any observed skin or equipment issues

Facilities often incorporate these steps into the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist framework or local equivalents, but implementation varies. For longer cases, some teams use a timed reminder (for example, during routine anesthetic checks) to prompt re-evaluation of padding integrity and contact points, since moisture, prep solutions, or irrigation can change friction and increase the risk of slippage.

Alarm handling and powered-system considerations

Some Traction tables include powered movements or integrated controls. If alarms or error indicators exist:

• Treat alarms as safety signals, not nuisances
• Pause movement and confirm patient stability before troubleshooting
• Follow the manufacturer IFU for error codes and safe reset procedures
• Maintain a plan for manual release or alternate positioning if power fails (capability varies by manufacturer)

Many traction systems are largely mechanical and may have no alarms. In those cases, the “alarm system” is often the team’s observation and communication. A subtle sign like unexpected limb drift, increased crank resistance, or a lock that “feels different” can be an early indicator of mechanical wear and should trigger a pause and reassessment.

Risk controls, labeling, and reporting culture

• Verify labels: weight limits, accessory compatibility, lock positions, and warning decals
• Keep accessories matched to the correct model to reduce unexpected failures
• Encourage reporting of near-misses (e.g., boot nearly slipped, lock partially engaged) to improve system reliability
• Tag and remove from service any equipment that shows structural damage, missing components, or unpredictable movement

A strong incident reporting culture is especially important with hospital equipment used across multiple rooms and teams. Tracking near-misses can reveal patterns—such as a particular boot size failing more often, a commonly misplaced pin, or a recurrent collision point with the C‑arm—allowing the facility to change processes before a harm event occurs.

How do I interpret the output?

Unlike monitors that produce physiologic measurements, a Traction table’s “output” is typically mechanical status and positioning information. Interpretation is about understanding what the device is indicating—and its limitations. In many cases, the most meaningful “verification” is the combination of imaging findings, visual alignment, and stable mechanical behavior after locks are engaged.

Types of outputs/readings you may encounter

Depending on the model, Traction table may provide:

• Traction force indicators (mechanical scale or digital display)
• Position markings for limb rotation or abduction/adduction (often reference-only)
• Table position indicators (height/tilt) if integrated with an operating table
• Lock status cues (visual alignment marks, tactile lock engagement, or indicator windows)
• Powered-system feedback such as battery status or error indicators (varies by manufacturer)

In many workflows, the most important “output” is intraoperative imaging and the observed stability of the limb position.

How clinicians typically interpret these outputs (general)

• Force readings are commonly treated as approximations. Actual force at the bone/joint can differ due to friction, soft-tissue compliance, and boot fit.
• Position markings are used as references to reproduce a setup, not as precise measurements.
• Lock indicators are safety-critical; a “nearly locked” state can be functionally unsafe.

Clinical interpretation always requires correlation with the surgical plan, imaging, and the patient’s overall condition. Device readings are supportive, not definitive.

A useful practical mindset is: “The table can tell you what it is doing mechanically, but it cannot tell you what the patient is experiencing.” For example, a traction scale may reflect tension in the mechanism, not pressure at the perineal interface, and a rotation marking may not reflect true hip or femoral rotation if the boot has shifted. When numeric indicators exist, teams should also confirm they understand whether the display is absolute, relative, or dependent on a “zeroing” process.

Common pitfalls and limitations

• False confidence in force scales: a displayed number does not guarantee safe or effective traction at the intended site.
• Unrecognized slippage: straps can loosen, especially with drape movement or fluid exposure.
• Reference marks drift: worn labels, bent components, or accessory substitutions can make markings unreliable.
• Overlooking counter-traction effects: body migration can occur even when limb traction seems stable.

When in doubt, teams typically stop, reassess the full setup, and follow local escalation pathways. It can also be helpful to treat “unexpected changes” (such as a new need to increase traction to maintain alignment) as a sign to check the entire system—boot fit, locks, and counter-traction—rather than assuming the underlying clinical situation is the only factor.

What if something goes wrong?

Problems with Traction table use can involve the patient interface (boots, posts, straps), the mechanical system (locks, clamps, traction mechanism), or the environment (imaging collisions, space constraints). A structured response helps limit harm. In most cases, the safest initial action is to stop movement, maintain stability, and communicate clearly before attempting corrective steps.

Troubleshooting checklist (general, non-brand-specific)

• Stop further traction changes and stabilize the patient position
• Confirm table brakes are engaged and the base is stable
• Check that all locks, clamps, and pins are fully seated and secured
• Inspect the traction boot for fit, strap integrity, and slippage
• Re-check the counter-traction support alignment and padding
• Look for fluid contamination on straps or pads that could increase slippage
• For powered systems: confirm power, battery, and control connection status
• Confirm C‑arm clearance if the issue occurred during imaging repositioning
• If any component appears damaged, stop use and switch to the backup plan per protocol

Common real-world scenarios include: the traction mechanism “creeps” after locking (possible wear or incomplete engagement), the boot slips when traction increases (size mismatch, moisture, worn straps), or a clamp will not fully seat (debris in the clamp interface, bent hardware, wrong accessory). Keeping a spare boot and straps available can prevent delays and reduce the temptation to “make do” with compromised components.

When to stop using the device

Stop and escalate according to facility policy if there is:

• Unstable table behavior (wobble, unexpected movement)
• Failure of a critical lock or traction mechanism
• Sudden release or inability to control traction smoothly
• Visible equipment damage, missing parts, or suspected structural compromise
• Any patient safety concern that cannot be quickly mitigated within protocol

Clinical teams should prioritize patient safety and follow supervision and local escalation pathways. If a traction table must be abandoned mid-case, having a pre-identified alternate positioning strategy (and knowing where the needed equipment is stored) reduces risk and stress.

When to escalate to biomedical engineering or the manufacturer

• Biomedical engineering/HTM: mechanical wear, repeated lock failures, hydraulic leaks, electrical faults, missing hardware, or unclear accessory compatibility
• Manufacturer/vendor: recurring failures, software issues (if applicable), parts replacement guidance, and safety notices/recalls (process varies by region)

Remove the device from service if necessary, apply an “out of service” tag, and prevent re-use until assessed. Facilities with multiple identical tables often benefit from tracking problems by asset tag so patterns can be detected (for example, a specific table consistently showing lock wear faster than others).

Documentation and reporting expectations

Common expectations include:

• Document what happened, when, and who was present
• Record device identifiers (asset tag, model, serial number if available)
• Preserve failed parts when safe to do so
• Report through local incident reporting systems and risk management pathways
• Follow national or regional medical device reporting rules as applicable (requirements vary by country)

A transparent reporting culture improves device reliability and procurement decisions over time. Even “small” issues—like a missing locking pin found just before draping—can be valuable signals for improving accessory control and storage workflows.

Infection control and cleaning of Traction table

Traction table is reused across patients and has multiple high-touch and patient-contact surfaces. Cleaning and disinfection are operationally important and frequently audited. Because these tables often have seams, joints, and removable pads, a consistent process helps prevent missed surfaces during fast OR turnovers.

Cleaning principles (general)

• Treat Traction table surfaces as high-touch medical equipment in the OR environment.
• Clean promptly after use to prevent drying of bioburden on pads and straps.
• Use only disinfectants approved by facility infection prevention and compatible with manufacturer IFU to avoid material degradation.

In addition, ensure that cleaning responsibilities are clear: which parts are cleaned in-room by environmental services or OR staff, and which are routed to central sterile services (if applicable). Ambiguity about “who cleans the boots” is a common source of inconsistent reprocessing.

Disinfection vs. sterilization (high-level overview)

• Cleaning removes visible soil and is always the first step.
• Disinfection (low/intermediate/high level) reduces microbial load on noncritical surfaces; the level required depends on policy and contact type.
• Sterilization is reserved for items intended to be sterile at point of use; most Traction table components are not sterilized, but some removable accessories may have specific reprocessing instructions (varies by manufacturer).

Always follow the manufacturer IFU for each accessory; “one approach fits all” does not apply. If straps or boot liners are reusable, confirm whether they are wipe-disinfected, laundered, or treated as single-patient use per policy.

High-touch points to prioritize

• Hand controls, levers, and traction cranks
• Side rails, clamps, and lock handles
• Traction boots/stirrups and strap interfaces
• Perineal post and its padding
• Table edges and patient contact pads
• Areas near the foot end that are frequently handled during imaging adjustments

It can also be important to clean undersides and crevices near clamp mounts and rail interfaces, where dried fluids can accumulate and later interfere with lock function.

Example cleaning workflow (non-brand-specific)

• Don appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) per policy
• Remove and discard single-use covers (if used)
• Pre-clean visible soil with approved wipes or detergent solution
• Disinfect using an approved agent, ensuring correct wet contact time
• Avoid spraying into joints, seams, or electrical connectors; use damp wiping instead
• Allow to dry fully; inspect for cracks, torn upholstery, or loosened padding
• Reprocess removable components through the appropriate pathway (OR cleaning vs. central sterile services) as required
• Document completion if your facility uses cleaning logs for capital equipment

Where straps and boots are reused, facilities often implement a “clean/dirty segregation” workflow (for example, a dedicated container for used boots to prevent accidental reuse before cleaning). This is especially helpful when multiple rooms share traction equipment.

Key operational reminders

• Disinfectant compatibility affects upholstery life; degradation can create micro-tears that are hard to clean.
• Boots and straps are frequent “weak points” for both infection prevention and mechanical reliability; manage them as controlled inventory.
• If IFUs conflict with facility policy, escalate to infection prevention and biomedical engineering for a reconciled process.

A practical lifecycle note: repeated chemical exposure and aggressive wiping can shorten the life of padding and printed markings. Many facilities plan periodic replacement of pads and straps as a predictable operating cost rather than waiting for visible failure.

Medical Device Companies & OEMs

Understanding who actually makes and supports a Traction table matters for uptime, accessory availability, and long-term serviceability. Even when the core table is robust, accessory shortages (boots, posts, clamps) can create “functional downtime” that disrupts OR scheduling.

Manufacturer vs. OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer)

• The manufacturer is the company that markets the product under its name and is typically responsible for regulatory documentation, labeling, and IFU.
• An OEM is a company that produces components or the full product that may be rebranded or bundled by another company.

OEM relationships can impact:

• Availability of service manuals and parts
• Whether accessories are interchangeable across brands (often they are not)
• Warranty terms and who is authorized to perform repairs
• Lead times for replacement components

For procurement teams, clarifying “who services what” before purchase reduces downtime later. It is also useful to clarify whether software (if present) and powered components can be serviced locally, and what the expected lifecycle is for consumable items like padding, straps, and battery packs.

Top 5 World Best Medical Device Companies / Manufacturers

Example industry leaders (not a ranking). Availability of Traction table configurations, catalogs, and regional support varies by manufacturer and country.

1. Getinge
   Getinge is a multinational known for hospital equipment and solutions used across perioperative and critical care environments. In many markets it is associated with operating room infrastructure, including surgical tables and accessories (specific offerings vary by region). Hospitals often evaluate Getinge for integrated OR workflows and service support models. Buyers may also consider how easily accessories can be standardized across multiple ORs and whether local service teams can support preventive maintenance schedules.

2. STERIS
   STERIS is widely recognized for infection prevention technologies and OR equipment. Depending on region and product line, it may offer surgical table systems and positioning accessories that can be configured for orthopedic workflows. Procurement teams often consider service coverage, parts availability, and compatibility with existing OR infrastructure. In addition, cleaning compatibility and the durability of upholstery and controls are frequently reviewed because traction tables see heavy chemical exposure.

3. Stryker
   Stryker is a global medical device company with a strong presence in orthopedics and surgical technologies. Across markets, its portfolio may include OR equipment and positioning solutions used in orthopedic cases (specific Traction table offerings vary by manufacturer and region). Buyers often assess integration with orthopedic workflows and training support. Some facilities also value coordinated training across implants, instruments, and positioning equipment to reduce variability in high-volume trauma services.

4. Zimmer Biomet
   Zimmer Biomet is a global orthopedic-focused company known for implants and musculoskeletal solutions. While implants are its best-known category, hospitals may also encounter related surgical technologies and instrumentation ecosystems that interface with orthopedic OR workflows. Traction table availability within its commercial structure varies by country and product strategy. When evaluating any bundled ecosystem, facilities often confirm which components are truly supported under the same service umbrella and which require separate contracts.

5. Smith+Nephew
   Smith+Nephew is an established multinational with orthopedic, sports medicine, and wound management portfolios. In many regions it is part of the broader ecosystem supporting orthopedic procedures, where positioning and OR workflow equipment selection matters. As with others, the specific Traction table product availability and direct support model varies by manufacturer and geography. Procurement teams frequently assess training depth, responsiveness for accessory replacement, and clarity around approved cleaning agents to protect the equipment surface materials.

Vendors, Suppliers, and Distributors

Capital medical equipment like Traction table is often purchased through a mix of direct manufacturer sales and authorized distribution networks. Understanding roles helps prevent gaps in training, parts, and warranty coverage. For many hospitals, the distributor relationship influences not only price, but also installation quality, staff training consistency, and response time when a critical accessory is missing on the day of surgery.

Role differences: vendor vs. supplier vs. distributor

• Vendor: the entity you buy from; may be the manufacturer or a reseller.
• Supplier: a broader term for organizations providing goods/services; may include accessories, consumables, or installation services.
• Distributor: typically holds inventory, manages logistics, and may provide first-line support and training under authorization.

For complex hospital equipment, confirm whether the distributor is authorized, whether they can provide installation and in-service training, and how service escalations are handled. Procurement teams often also confirm whether the vendor can provide a loaner or rapid replacement if the table is down for repair, which can be critical for trauma centers.

Top 5 World Best Vendors / Suppliers / Distributors

Example global distributors (not a ranking). Coverage and equipment specialization vary significantly by region and business unit.

1. McKesson
   McKesson is a large healthcare supply and distribution organization with extensive logistics capabilities in its primary markets. It often serves hospitals and health systems with broad product catalogs and supply chain services. Availability of capital equipment channels and installation support varies by region and contract structure. For traction-capable equipment, facilities typically verify whether orthopedic accessories are stocked locally or must be special-ordered.

2. Cardinal Health
   Cardinal Health is a major distributor and services provider in several healthcare markets. It is commonly involved in supply chain programs that support hospitals with purchasing, logistics, and inventory management. For specialized OR equipment, buyers typically verify authorized channels and service handoffs. In some cases, distributor-managed inventory programs can help prevent stock-outs of high-wear items like straps and pads.

3. Medline Industries
   Medline is widely known for medical-surgical supplies and has expanded into broader distribution and services in many regions. Hospitals may work with Medline for both routine consumables and selected equipment categories depending on country operations. Service models for capital equipment vary by geography and local partnerships. Facilities often clarify whether in-service training is included and who provides ongoing competency refreshers.

4. Henry Schein
   Henry Schein is a global supplier serving multiple care settings, including clinics and hospitals in some regions. Its strength is often in distribution networks and value-added services, with offerings shaped by local subsidiaries. For Traction table procurement, facilities typically confirm availability, delivery/installation capability, and after-sales support pathways. Buyers may also ask whether accessories are sourced through the same channel to simplify compatibility and warranty management.

5. Owens & Minor
   Owens & Minor is known for healthcare logistics and supply chain services, particularly in certain markets. It may support hospitals with distribution, inventory solutions, and sourcing programs. As with other broad-line distributors, capital equipment capability and service coverage depend on local operations and authorized agreements. For traction systems, consistent accessory replenishment and clear repair escalation pathways are common evaluation points.

Global Market Snapshot by Country

India
Traction table demand is tied to growth in trauma care capacity, expansion of private hospitals, and increasing procedural volume in urban centers. Many facilities rely on imported systems or imported components, while local service capability varies by city and vendor network. Rural access is often constrained by capital budgets and limited biomedical engineering coverage. Multi-site hospital groups in major cities may prioritize standardizing one platform to simplify training and spare parts.

China
Large hospital systems and high surgical throughput in major cities drive demand for orthopedic OR infrastructure, including Traction table configurations. Domestic manufacturing capacity for hospital equipment is significant, though procurement decisions often balance price, service responsiveness, and integration with imaging. Smaller facilities may prioritize basic, serviceable models with reliable parts supply. Tender requirements and local regulatory pathways can influence whether imported accessories are readily available.

United States
Use is supported by high volumes of orthopedic trauma and elective procedures and well-developed OR imaging workflows. Purchasing decisions frequently emphasize service contracts, accessory standardization, and compliance with facility safety programs. Market access is broad, but hospitals still face variability in training consistency and accessory compatibility across campuses. Increasing attention to pressure injury prevention and documentation also shapes how traction table use is audited.

Indonesia
Demand is concentrated in large urban hospitals where orthopedic trauma services and fluoroscopy access are more reliable. Import dependence for specialized surgical tables and traction accessories is common, with service coverage strongest in major cities. Regional hospitals may face delays in parts supply and limited availability of trained service engineers. Facilities often evaluate distributor reach across islands as a practical criterion for uptime.

Pakistan
Traction table procurement often focuses on practical durability, ease of maintenance, and affordability within constrained capital budgets. Import channels and distributor strength influence uptime, and access to original accessories may be inconsistent outside major metropolitan areas. Public sector facilities may face longer procurement cycles and variable maintenance resources. Many buyers favor mechanically straightforward systems that can be supported with local repair capability.

Nigeria
Market needs are driven by trauma burden and expanding private healthcare in major cities, while public facilities may experience capital constraints and maintenance challenges. Import dependence is common, and after-sales support quality can vary widely by vendor and region. Facilities often prioritize serviceability, spare parts access, and straightforward mechanical designs. Accessory control and staff training can be limiting factors when equipment is shared across departments.

Brazil
Demand is supported by a mix of public and private hospital systems with established orthopedic services in larger cities. Procurement may involve complex tendering and compliance requirements, with strong attention to local service coverage and training. Regional disparities persist, affecting access to advanced OR equipment outside major centers. Some institutions place high value on locally available consumables and accessories to reduce downtime.

Bangladesh
Growing surgical capacity in urban hospitals drives interest in orthopedic positioning solutions, but capital budgets and import logistics can be limiting factors. Many facilities depend on distributors for installation and training, with variable access to manufacturer-authorized service. Rural expansion is often constrained by infrastructure and biomedical engineering staffing. Standardized training packages can be especially helpful where staff turnover is high.

Russia
Demand is influenced by large tertiary hospitals and regional trauma services, with procurement shaped by import availability and local service ecosystems. Facilities typically assess supply chain reliability for accessories and spare parts as a core buying criterion. Urban centers are more likely to support comprehensive maintenance programs than remote areas. Lifecycle planning may be influenced by regional logistics and longer lead times for imported components.

Mexico
Traction table adoption is strongest in larger private hospitals and high-volume public centers with established orthopedic surgery and imaging capability. Buyers often balance price with warranty terms, training availability, and service responsiveness. Outside major cities, access may depend on distributor presence and logistics. Facilities sometimes prioritize models that can share accessories across multiple sites to simplify inventory.

Ethiopia
Market development is closely tied to expansion of surgical services and investment in OR infrastructure, often supported through centralized procurement and partnerships. Import dependence is common, and service capability can be limited, making maintainability and training critical. Access is generally concentrated in major urban referral hospitals. Some programs place strong emphasis on durable upholstery and simple mechanical designs to match available reprocessing resources.

Japan
High standards for OR efficiency, device quality, and process discipline shape Traction table procurement and use. Mature service networks and strong biomedical engineering practices support preventive maintenance and accessory control. Facilities often prioritize integration with imaging workflows and consistent training across teams. Procurement may also consider noise, smoothness of controls, and long-term parts availability as part of quality expectations.

Philippines
Demand centers on tertiary hospitals in urban areas with orthopedic trauma capability and fluoroscopy access. Import reliance is common for specialized tables and traction accessories, and service quality depends on distributor coverage and training programs. Smaller provincial hospitals may use simpler setups due to capital and staffing constraints. Standardized accessory kits can help reduce setup variability when equipment is moved between rooms.

Egypt
Traction table needs are driven by busy trauma services and growth in private hospital capacity in major cities. Import channels, tender processes, and access to authorized maintenance significantly shape purchasing decisions. Hospitals often evaluate durability, parts availability, and the practicality of cleaning and reprocessing accessories. Some facilities also consider whether training can be delivered across multiple shifts to match staffing patterns.

Democratic Republic of the Congo
Access is uneven, with higher capability concentrated in urban referral centers and private facilities. Import dependence, logistics complexity, and limited biomedical engineering resources can constrain both procurement and long-term uptime. Buyers often prioritize robust, maintainable hospital equipment with clear training and spare parts pathways. Realistic service response times and the availability of local technical partners can be decisive.

Vietnam
Growing investment in surgical services and modernization of tertiary hospitals supports demand for orthopedic OR equipment, including Traction table configurations. Many facilities rely on imports or imported components, and distributor quality strongly affects training and service response times. Urban-rural gaps persist in imaging availability and equipment maintenance. Hospitals may seek modular systems that can expand capability over time without replacing the entire platform.

Iran
Demand reflects established orthopedic services and ongoing investment in hospital capabilities, with procurement influenced by supply chain constraints and local service capacity. Facilities may emphasize maintainability, parts sourcing reliability, and compatibility with existing OR infrastructure. Training and documentation consistency can vary across institutions. Some buyers prioritize equipment that can be supported with in-country parts manufacturing or refurbishment.

Turkey
A large hospital sector with active trauma and elective orthopedics supports steady demand for surgical positioning equipment. Procurement often considers service network strength, accessory availability, and the ability to support multi-site hospital groups. Urban centers generally have stronger biomedical engineering support than smaller regional facilities. Standardization across hospital networks can reduce training burden and simplify preventive maintenance planning.

Germany
Demand is shaped by mature surgical services, stringent process expectations, and a strong service ecosystem. Hospitals often prioritize lifecycle management, documented maintenance, and compatibility with imaging and OR integration standards. Procurement decisions commonly weigh total cost of ownership, including service, training, and accessory replacement. Documentation quality and traceability of accessories are often part of internal audits.

Thailand
Traction table demand is concentrated in larger public and private hospitals with orthopedic trauma and elective surgery capacity. Import dependence varies, and distributor capability plays a major role in training and maintenance coverage. Outside Bangkok and major provinces, service response time and parts access can be limiting factors. Facilities may choose widely supported platforms to reduce downtime risk in provincial centers.

Key Takeaways and Practical Checklist for Traction table

• Treat Traction table setup as a critical safety step, not a routine task.
• Confirm the exact procedure plan and laterality before assembling attachments.
• Use only manufacturer-approved accessories when possible; substitutions add risk.
• Verify preventive maintenance status before clinical use.
• Inspect boots, straps, clamps, and pins for wear at every setup.
• Confirm all locks are fully engaged before applying traction.
• Apply traction gradually and re-check patient contact points after each change.
• Assign one team member to “own” positioning checks throughout the case.
• Prioritize padding at the perineal interface, heel, malleoli, and strap edges.
• Ensure the counter-traction method is aligned and stable before traction increases.
• Route cables and tubing to avoid pulling on the traction assembly.
• Confirm C‑arm clearance early, before the sterile field limits movement.
• Use clear verbal call-outs for traction, rotation, and abduction/adduction changes.
• Re-check locks after any imaging repositioning or table height change.
• Treat traction force indicators as approximate unless verified by manufacturer guidance.
• Document notable traction and position changes per local policy.
• Keep a backup positioning plan if the traction mechanism fails mid-case.
• Stop use if the table becomes unstable or a critical lock cannot be secured.
• Tag and remove from service any device with structural damage or missing parts.
• Escalate recurring failures to biomedical engineering/HTM promptly.
• Confirm the cleaning method for each accessory; boots and straps often differ.
• Clean visible soil first, then disinfect with correct wet contact time.
• Avoid spraying disinfectant into joints or electrical connectors.
• Inspect upholstery for cracks; damaged pads are harder to disinfect reliably.
• Control accessory inventory to prevent mismatched parts across rooms.
• Train new staff using model-specific IFU and supervised practice.
• Refresh competency when models change or when incident trends are noted.
• Incorporate radiation safety planning because fluoroscopy is often used.
• Maintain ergonomic awareness; avoid staff injuries during patient transfer.
• Verify weight limits for the table and all extensions before use.
• Standardize storage so small parts (pins, clamps) are not lost.
• Include Traction table checks in the surgical safety time-out where appropriate.
• Encourage near-miss reporting to improve process reliability.
• Review incident reports to identify recurring failure modes and training gaps.
• Procurement should evaluate service coverage, parts availability, and response time.
• Consider total cost of ownership: accessories, pads, service, and downtime impact.
• Confirm who provides warranty service: manufacturer, OEM, or authorized distributor.
• Keep IFUs accessible in the OR for quick reference during setup and cleaning.
• Align infection prevention, biomedical engineering, and OR leadership on policies.

Additional practical points many facilities find useful:

• Confirm staff know where the emergency release or rapid traction release mechanism is located on the specific model.
• Audit and replace high-wear items (boots, straps, post padding) on a planned schedule rather than waiting for failures.
• Use labeled bins or shadow boards for traction accessories to make missing parts obvious during room setup.
• Include traction table components in OR turnover checks so rails, clamps, and posts are not left partially assembled or misplaced.
• If numeric force/position indicators are used, ensure teams agree on units and reference “zero” during setup to avoid miscommunication.

If you are looking for contributions and suggestion for this content please drop an email to contact@myhospitalnow.com