Umbilical cord scissors: Overview, Uses and Top Manufacturer Company

Introduction

Umbilical cord scissors are a simple but high-impact medical device used during childbirth to cut the newborn’s umbilical cord after it has been secured (typically with a clamp or hemostat). They are commonly found in labor and delivery units, operating rooms, emergency obstetric kits, and community birth settings. Despite their simplicity, they sit at the intersection of clinical safety, infection prevention, sterile processing, and supply chain reliability—areas that matter to both frontline clinicians and hospital operations leaders.

For medical students and trainees, Umbilical cord scissors are often one of the first “real-world” instruments encountered in obstetrics, midwifery, pediatrics, or emergency medicine rotations, where the focus is on sterile technique, safe handoffs, and performing a task efficiently under pressure.

This article explains what Umbilical cord scissors are, when they are used, how to operate them safely, how to clean and reprocess them (when reusable), and what to consider when purchasing or standardizing them as hospital equipment. It also provides a practical, globally aware market snapshot to support procurement and program planning across different health system contexts.

What is Umbilical cord scissors and why do we use it?

Definition and purpose

Umbilical cord scissors are surgical scissors designed for transecting the umbilical cord in a controlled, predictable way. They may be packaged as a standalone sterile instrument, included in a delivery kit, or integrated into a larger obstetric instrument set (particularly for operative vaginal birth or cesarean delivery workflows).

While many cutting tools can sever tissue, Umbilical cord scissors are typically selected because they are purpose-fit for:

• A thick, slippery, blood-covered structure (the cord)
• A time-sensitive moment with multiple team members and competing tasks
• A need to reduce the risk of accidental injury to the newborn or birthing parent
• A need for compatibility with sterile technique and standardized kits

Common clinical settings

Umbilical cord scissors are used across a wide range of care environments:

• Labor and Delivery (L&D) for routine vaginal births
• Operating rooms (ORs) during cesarean deliveries (often as part of a surgical instrument set)
• Emergency departments for unexpected deliveries
• Ambulance or prehospital care in rare out-of-hospital birth scenarios
• Community birth settings and rural clinics where delivery kits may be preassembled
• Training and simulation labs for obstetric and neonatal skill development

The exact pathway (who cuts the cord, when, and with what tool) depends on local policy, professional scope, and case context.

Key benefits for patient care and workflow

Even for a low-tech instrument, standardizing Umbilical cord scissors can support quality and operations:

• Predictable cutting performance when sharp and correctly maintained
• Efficient workflow (fast access, easy handling, minimal setup)
• Lower cognitive load compared with improvising a cutting tool
• Supports sterile technique when packaged sterile or properly reprocessed
• Improves kit consistency for emergency obstetric preparedness
• Reduces instrument misuse when staff know exactly what belongs in the delivery setup

From an operations perspective, consistency matters: the right scissors available at the right time reduces delays, workarounds, and unnecessary opening of extra sets (which increases cost and reprocessing burden).

How it functions (plain-language mechanism)

Umbilical cord scissors are a purely mechanical cutting instrument. Two sharpened blades pivot around a hinge (fulcrum). When the handles are squeezed, the blades slide past each other with enough shear force to cut tissue fibers. Design details vary by manufacturer, but commonly relevant features include:

• Blade geometry (straight or curved) to improve access and visibility
• Tip design (often blunt or rounded) to reduce accidental puncture risk
• Handle size and ergonomics for gloved hands
• Hinge tension that affects smoothness and cutting control
• Surface finish that influences cleanability and corrosion resistance

Some models may include serrations or micro-serrations to reduce slipping, but this varies by manufacturer and can affect cleaning complexity.

How medical students typically learn this device

Most learners encounter Umbilical cord scissors in one of three ways:

1. Skills lab/simulation: practicing sterile opening, safe passing, and cord-cut steps using mannequins
2. Clinical observation: watching an obstetrician, midwife, or nurse perform the workflow during birth
3. Supervised participation: assisting with setup, instrument handling, or cutting under direct supervision

In training, the “lesson” is rarely just cutting—it is about teamwork, communication, sterile field discipline, and respecting local protocols.

When should I use Umbilical cord scissors (and when should I not)?

Appropriate use cases

Umbilical cord scissors are generally used when a clinical team has determined that the umbilical cord should be cut and the cord has been appropriately secured. Common scenarios include:

• Cutting the cord in a routine birth workflow after clamping/occluding the cord
• Use as part of a sterile cesarean delivery instrument set
• Inclusion in obstetric emergency kits for unplanned deliveries
• Use in simulation training for obstetric and neonatal teams

In most facilities, the timing and exact method are guided by institutional protocols and clinician judgment.

Situations where it may not be suitable

Umbilical cord scissors may be the wrong tool—or unsafe to use—when:

• Sterility is required but cannot be assured (packaging compromised, instrument dropped, or reprocessing status unclear)
• The scissors are dull, loose, misaligned, or visibly damaged
• A single-use scissor is being considered for reuse (reprocessing single-use devices is policy- and jurisdiction-dependent and may be prohibited)
• The workflow calls for a different tool due to space constraints or surgical approach (varies by procedure and local practice)
• The instrument is being used for non-intended tasks (cutting dressings, tubing, suture, packaging), which can dull blades and increase contamination risk

Safety cautions and general contraindication themes (non-clinical)

Umbilical cord scissors do not have “contraindications” in the way medications do, but there are practical risk conditions where use should pause:

• Unclear identification of the structure to cut (visual obstruction, poor lighting, cluttered field)
• Inadequate control of the cord (slipping, tension, or proximity to skin)
• Insufficient team communication during a high-stress moment
• Inadequate PPE or sharps safety arrangements

The safest use is usually the simplest: correct instrument, clear view, secured cord, controlled cut, and immediate safe handling/disposal or transfer for reprocessing.

Emphasize clinical judgment and supervision

The decision of when and how to cut the cord is clinical and protocol-driven. Trainees should perform tasks involving Umbilical cord scissors only within their scope and under appropriate supervision, following local obstetric, neonatal, and infection prevention policies.

What do I need before starting?

Required setup, environment, and accessories

A safe and efficient setup typically includes:

• A sterile pair of Umbilical cord scissors (single-use sterile pack or properly reprocessed reusable instrument)
• Cord clamp(s) or hemostats to secure/occlude the cord (type varies by facility)
• Personal protective equipment (PPE) appropriate for blood/body fluid exposure (e.g., gloves, eye/face protection as required)
• Adequate lighting and positioning to clearly visualize the cord and cutting site
• A designated clean/sterile area and a separate contaminated instrument area
• A sharps/biohazard disposal pathway (even though scissors are not needles, they are still a cutting hazard and can be contaminated)

In hospitals, Umbilical cord scissors are often included in standardized birth packs to reduce last-minute searching and variability.

Training and competency expectations

For clinicians and trainees, competency is less about force and more about:

• Maintaining aseptic technique and protecting the sterile field
• Safe instrument handling (passing, placement, and disposal)
• Recognizing when an instrument is not fit for use
• Understanding escalation pathways (replace instrument, call for help, report defects)

Facilities often document competency through orientation checklists, simulation assessments, or supervised sign-offs. The details depend on professional role and local policy.

Pre-use checks and documentation

Before use, a quick safety check reduces preventable errors:

• Confirm packaging integrity and that sterility indicators (if present) are acceptable
• Check for visible debris, corrosion, pitting, or discoloration on reusable instruments
• Open and close the scissors to assess smooth hinge motion and blade alignment
• Confirm the scissors are the correct type for the set (e.g., sterile, intended for tissue)
• If your facility uses tray tracking, ensure the set is logged/traceable per local process

Documentation expectations vary. Some sites document the use of a birth kit rather than the individual instrument; others track reusable sets via sterile processing systems.

Operational prerequisites for hospitals and health systems

For administrators, procurement teams, and biomedical/clinical engineering stakeholders, readiness includes:

• Commissioning/acceptance: verifying that the item received matches the specification and that the manufacturer’s Instructions for Use (IFU) are available
• Sterile processing readiness: confirming the device is compatible with available cleaning and sterilization methods (reusables)
• Consumables and par levels: ensuring clamps, kits, and replacement scissors are stocked to avoid workarounds
• Policy clarity: single-use vs reusable, who reprocesses, and what happens if sterility is compromised
• Maintenance plan: inspection, sharpening or replacement intervals (varies by manufacturer and facility practice)
• Risk management: defining how defects, near misses, and injuries are reported and investigated

Roles and responsibilities (who does what)

Clear ownership reduces gaps:

• Clinicians (OB, midwives, nurses, neonatal staff): safe use, field control, and immediate post-use handling
• Sterile Processing Department (SPD)/Central Sterile Supply Department (CSSD): cleaning, inspection, assembly, sterilization, and release of reusable instruments
• Biomedical/clinical engineering: may support risk assessment, device standardization decisions, incident investigations, and vendor coordination (scope varies by facility)
• Procurement/supply chain: sourcing, contracting, vendor performance, stock management, recalls, and substitution controls
• Infection prevention and quality teams: policies, audits, and outbreak/incident response

Umbilical cord scissors are “simple,” but they touch many parts of the system.

How do I use it correctly (basic operation)?

Umbilical cord scissors are typically straightforward to operate, but correct technique is about control, visibility, and workflow discipline. Specific steps vary by local protocol and birth context, so treat the sequence below as general education—not a substitute for facility procedures.

Universal workflow principles

Regardless of model or setting, these principles are widely applicable:

• Maintain sterility when sterility is required
• Secure the cord with the appropriate occlusion method (per protocol) before cutting
• Keep hands and patient tissue clear of the blade path
• Use one controlled cut when possible to reduce crushing or fraying
• Manage the instrument safely after use (disposal or reprocessing)

Basic step-by-step workflow (general)

1. Prepare the field and team – Confirm who is performing the cut and who is assisting. – Ensure adequate lighting and a stable working position. – Confirm the presence of clamps and a disposal/reprocessing pathway.

2. Verify instrument readiness – Confirm the Umbilical cord scissors are sterile and packaging is intact (if single-use). – If reusable, confirm the instrument has been released by SPD/CSSD and appears clean and functional.

3. Open sterile packaging correctly (if applicable) – Use standard sterile opening technique. – Place the scissors onto the sterile field without contaminating them.

4. Secure and position the cord – Ensure the cord is controlled and stabilized (commonly with clamps or hemostats, per local policy). – Identify the intended cutting location according to protocol.

5. Perform the cut – Align the blades at the cutting point with a clear view. – Keep fingers and surrounding tissue out of the cutting path. – Close the scissors in a firm, controlled motion.

6. Confirm task completion – Visually confirm the cord is fully separated and that clamps remain in place as intended. – Communicate completion to the team so downstream steps proceed smoothly.

7. Post-use handling – If single-use: dispose according to facility policy for contaminated sharps/clinical waste. – If reusable: place in the designated contaminated instrument container for transport to SPD/CSSD.

Setup, calibration, and “settings”

Umbilical cord scissors generally have no electronic settings, calibration, or display. However, users should be aware of mechanical factors that affect performance:

• Hinge tension: too tight may cause jerky cutting; too loose may lead to poor blade apposition
• Blade sharpness and alignment: dullness increases crushing and may require repeated cutting motions
• Handle ergonomics: glove size and hand position can affect control

Some instruments may have manufacturer-specific features (coatings, serrations, specialized tip designs). If any adjustment is possible (not common), follow the manufacturer IFU and facility policy—do not improvise.

Steps that are commonly universal across models

Even when models differ, these steps tend to be consistent:

• Verify sterility/cleanliness and packaging integrity
• Maintain aseptic technique where indicated
• Stabilize the cord and keep the cutting path clear
• Use controlled force and avoid twisting or tearing
• Dispose or segregate for reprocessing immediately after use

For trainees, the most common preventable errors are contamination of a sterile scissor and unsafe post-use handling.

How do I keep the patient safe?

Patient safety with Umbilical cord scissors depends on preventing three broad categories of harm: infection risk, accidental injury, and process failures (communication and workflow gaps). Because childbirth is high-tempo, human factors matter as much as the instrument itself.

Safety practices and monitoring (general)

Key practices that support safer use include:

• Use the right instrument: a sterile, intended-for-tissue scissor rather than a multipurpose utility scissor
• Maintain a clean field: keep the instrument on a clean/sterile surface until needed
• Control the workspace: avoid cutting in a crowded field or when visibility is poor
• Hand safety: stabilize the cord without placing fingers in the cutting trajectory
• Team communication: verbalize intent (“ready to cut”) and completion to reduce surprises
• Post-cut confirmation: visually confirm separation and that associated devices (e.g., clamp) remain positioned as intended per protocol

Monitoring here is usually direct observation, not device alarms. Safety is supported by standardized steps and a culture that welcomes speaking up.

Alarm handling and human factors (what replaces “alarms”)

Umbilical cord scissors do not alarm, so facilities rely on process controls:

• Standardized birth kits reduce searching and substitutions
• Checklists reduce omission of clamps, sterile gloves, or disposal setup
• Instrument counts (in surgical settings) reduce retained item risk
• Clear handoff language reduces miscommunication between OB and neonatal teams

Human factors problems to anticipate:

• Rushing, fatigue, low staffing, or shift changes
• Poor lighting, cramped space, or equipment clutter
• Unplanned deliveries outside the usual birth unit

Planning for these conditions is part of safe obstetric operations.

Risk controls that administrators and quality teams can support

Leaders can reduce risk system-wide by standardizing:

• Labeling and packaging checks at point of use (sterile indicator verification, expiry checks where applicable)
• Approved product lists to control substitutions that may not meet cleaning/sterilization or performance expectations
• Sharps safety workflows including defined disposal locations and “neutral zone” passing practices in procedural areas
• Incident reporting expectations for instrument failure, packaging defects, contamination events, and staff injuries

A strong reporting culture matters because many failures (e.g., dull blades, hinge problems) become visible only at the bedside.

Follow facility protocol and manufacturer guidance

For any medical equipment, the hierarchy is:

1. Facility policy and clinical protocol
2. Manufacturer IFU
3. Professional scope and supervision requirements

When these conflict, escalation through clinical leadership, infection prevention, and supply chain is safer than improvising in the moment.

How do I interpret the output?

Umbilical cord scissors do not generate numeric outputs, waveforms, or machine-read results. The “output” is the quality and completeness of the cut and the downstream workflow cues it enables.

Types of “outputs” you can assess

Clinicians usually interpret:

• Complete transection: the cord is fully separated rather than partially cut
• Cut quality: a clean cut versus fraying, crushing, or tearing
• Device interaction: clamps/hemostats remain intact and positioned as intended
• Instrument feel: smooth cutting motion versus resistance, snagging, or slipping

In sterile settings, teams may also interpret the sterility assurance cues (packaging integrity, indicator status), which indirectly determine whether the instrument is acceptable for use.

Common pitfalls and limitations

Because the assessment is visual and tactile, it is vulnerable to:

• False confidence: the cord may look separated but still have residual tissue strands
• Poor visibility: blood, drapes, or lighting can obscure the cutting point
• Dull scissors: increased crushing can make the cut appear irregular and may prompt repeated cutting motions
• Wrong tool: using general-purpose scissors can slip or perform unpredictably

Importantly, cut appearance alone does not substitute for clinical assessment and protocol-driven observation after the cord is cut.

Emphasize artifacts and need for clinical correlation

“Artifacts” in this context are process and environment issues—wet gloves, slippery tissue, cramped space, or an instrument with hinge resistance—that can mimic poor technique. Teams should correlate what they see with the overall clinical context and follow local escalation steps if the instrument or workflow is not performing safely.

What if something goes wrong?

Problems with Umbilical cord scissors are usually mechanical (dullness, misalignment), process-related (sterility compromise), or supply-related (wrong item in the kit). A structured response reduces harm and supports learning.

Troubleshooting checklist (practical)

If something goes wrong, consider the following sequence:

• Stop and reassess the field
• Is sterility still intact where required?

• Is visibility adequate to proceed safely?

• Check the instrument

• Are the blades aligned and moving smoothly?

• Is there visible damage, corrosion, debris, or looseness at the hinge?

• Replace rather than force

• If cutting performance is poor, do not continue repeated “sawing” motions.

• Obtain a replacement sterile instrument per protocol.

• Manage contamination

• If the instrument is dropped or packaging is compromised, treat it as non-sterile.

• Follow facility process for obtaining a new sterile item and documenting the event if required.

• Secure the workflow

• Communicate clearly with the team about delays or equipment replacement needs.

When to stop use immediately

Stop and replace/escalate if:

• The instrument is not sterile when sterility is required
• The scissors are damaged, misaligned, or visibly contaminated
• The hinge is seized or the blades do not meet properly
• There is uncertainty about correct structure identification due to poor visualization

When to escalate to biomedical engineering, SPD/CSSD, or the manufacturer

Escalation pathways vary, but common triggers include:

• Repeated reports of dullness or hinge failure across batches or sets
• Suspected packaging/sterility integrity problems in a shipment or kit assembly line
• A staff injury (cut) or exposure related to instrument handling
• Any event that could represent a quality defect requiring vendor investigation

In many hospitals, SPD/CSSD and supply chain lead the initial triage; biomedical/clinical engineering may support formal investigation depending on local governance.

Documentation and safety reporting expectations (general)

Good documentation strengthens quality improvement:

• Record the event in the facility’s incident reporting system per policy
• Preserve identifiers when available (kit lot number, tray ID, procurement SKU)
• Quarantine the suspect instrument for inspection rather than returning it to circulation
• Share patterns with procurement to inform vendor performance reviews and product evaluation

Avoiding blame and focusing on system fixes is especially important in obstetric workflows, where time pressure can drive risky workarounds.

Infection control and cleaning of Umbilical cord scissors

Infection prevention for Umbilical cord scissors depends on whether they are single-use sterile or reusable. Either way, the instrument is exposed to blood and body fluids and should be handled as potentially contaminated after use.

Cleaning principles (what “clean” actually means)

Three related but distinct terms are often confused:

• Cleaning: physical removal of soil (blood, tissue, proteins) using water and detergents
• Disinfection: reduction of microorganisms to a safer level (not necessarily spores)
• Sterilization: validated process intended to eliminate all forms of microbial life, including spores

Reusable surgical instruments that contact sterile tissue or blood are typically treated as critical items and require sterilization after thorough cleaning. The exact classification and required process should follow local infection prevention policy and the manufacturer IFU.

High-touch and high-risk points on the instrument

Umbilical cord scissors have areas that are easy to miss during reprocessing:

• The hinge/box lock area (soil can accumulate and dry)
• The inner blade surfaces near the pivot
• Any serrations or textured grip surfaces (if present)
• The handle rings and joints where biofilm can develop if cleaning is inadequate

Even a small amount of retained soil can interfere with sterilization effectiveness and instrument function.

Example reprocessing workflow (non-brand-specific)

Always follow the manufacturer IFU and your facility’s SPD/CSSD procedures. A typical reusable instrument workflow may include:

1. Point-of-use care – Remove gross soil promptly (per policy) and keep instruments from drying. – Place in a designated container for transport.

2. Transport – Use closed or covered transport to protect staff and the environment. – Separate from clean supplies to avoid cross-contamination.

3. Decontamination and cleaning – Manual cleaning with appropriate detergent and brushing, paying attention to the hinge. – Rinse thoroughly to remove detergent residues. – Ultrasonic cleaning may be used depending on facility workflow and instrument compatibility (varies by manufacturer).

4. Inspection and function check – Inspect for cleanliness, corrosion, cracks, burrs, and misalignment. – Check hinge smoothness and blade meeting (cut test methods vary by facility).

5. Packaging – Place in appropriate sterilization packaging or trays. – Include indicators as required by facility practice.

6. Sterilization – Sterilize using the method and cycle validated for that instrument (commonly steam, but compatibility varies by manufacturer). – Dry and cool per protocol before handling/storage.

7. Storage and distribution – Store in a controlled area to maintain package integrity. – Use event-related sterility principles per facility policy.

Single-use instruments: disposal and policy clarity

If Umbilical cord scissors are labeled single-use, facilities typically:

• Dispose of them after one use as contaminated clinical waste/sharps per policy
• Do not reprocess unless a formal, approved program exists (jurisdiction- and policy-dependent)

Clarity here is important for cost control and safety. Reprocessing single-use items without an approved pathway can create infection prevention and regulatory risk.

Why IFUs and local policy matter

Two hospitals can have the same scissors but different sterilizers, detergents, water quality, and workflow. That is why the IFU and local infection prevention policy are the safest sources for exact steps, contact times, and sterilization parameters—these details vary by manufacturer and facility capability.

Medical Device Companies & OEMs

Manufacturer vs. OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer)

In the context of medical equipment and surgical instruments:

• A manufacturer is the company that places the product on the market under its name and is typically responsible for regulatory compliance, labeling, quality systems, and post-market surveillance (requirements vary by jurisdiction).
• An OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) may produce components or complete products that are then branded and sold by another company. OEM arrangements are common in instruments, kits, and private-label supply chains.

How OEM relationships can impact quality, support, and service

OEM relationships are not inherently good or bad, but they can affect:

• Traceability: how easily a hospital can identify the true production source during a defect investigation
• Consistency: material selection, heat treatment, blade sharpening processes, and inspection standards may differ across factories (varies by manufacturer)
• Support: warranty handling, spare parts, and technical documentation may depend on the brand owner even if the OEM made the instrument
• Change control: unannounced manufacturing changes can create performance variation if vendor governance is weak

For procurement leaders, asking about quality certifications, change notification practices, and complaint handling processes can be more informative than brand familiarity alone.

Top 5 World Best Medical Device Companies / Manufacturers

Example industry leaders (not a ranking). Availability of Umbilical cord scissors within these portfolios varies by manufacturer, region, and distribution model.

1. Johnson & Johnson (J&J) – J&J is widely recognized for a broad healthcare footprint spanning pharmaceuticals and medical devices.
   – In medical technology, its companies have historically been associated with surgical products and operating room workflows.
   – Global presence and established supply channels are often relevant to large health systems, though specific instrument offerings vary by market.

2. Medtronic – Medtronic is known globally for complex medical devices, implants, and procedure-enabling technologies.
   – Its strength is often in devices that require technical support, training, and service ecosystems.
   – For simple instruments like scissors, hospitals may still interact with Medtronic mainly through broader contracting rather than direct relevance to cord-cutting tools.

3. Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD) – BD is commonly associated with vascular access, medication delivery, and infection prevention-oriented product lines.
   – Many hospitals value BD for standardized consumables and global distribution reach.
   – Whether BD-branded options include Umbilical cord scissors depends on local catalogs and supplier agreements (varies by manufacturer).

4. B. Braun – B. Braun is known in many regions for surgical, infusion, and sterilization-related product categories.
   – The company’s footprint often includes both disposables and reusables, making it relevant to hospitals balancing reprocessing capacity and single-use consumption.
   – Specific instrument availability and after-sales support can differ significantly by country and local distributor.

5. Stryker – Stryker is recognized for a strong presence in operating room technology and surgical equipment in many markets.
   – Its portfolio often emphasizes procedure efficiency, infrastructure, and equipment lifecycle support.
   – For basic instruments, hospitals may encounter Stryker primarily through broader OR contracting rather than direct cord scissor sourcing (varies by market).

Vendors, Suppliers, and Distributors

Role differences: vendor vs supplier vs distributor

These terms are often used interchangeably, but in hospital operations they can mean different things:

• A vendor is any entity that sells goods or services to a healthcare organization (directly or through a platform).
• A supplier is the organization that provides the product—sometimes the manufacturer, sometimes an intermediary.
• A distributor typically holds inventory, manages logistics, and delivers products to hospitals, often providing value-added services like kitting, returns, and recall management.

Understanding who actually controls inventory, substitution decisions, and complaint handling helps procurement teams manage risk.

Top 5 World Best Vendors / Suppliers / Distributors

Example global distributors (not a ranking). Coverage, product availability, and service levels vary by country and contract structure.

1. McKesson – McKesson is known in some regions for large-scale healthcare distribution and logistics.
   – Distributor-led standardization can simplify purchasing of routine hospital equipment and consumables.
   – Service offerings often include inventory management support, though availability outside certain markets varies.

2. Cardinal Health – Cardinal Health is commonly associated with medical-surgical distribution and supply chain services in select regions.
   – Many facilities rely on such distributors for consistent replenishment of high-volume consumables and kits.
   – Support models and catalog breadth differ by geography and local partnerships.

3. Medline – Medline is widely recognized in many markets for medical-surgical supplies, including private-label product lines.
   – Distributors with private-label options may offer cost-focused alternatives, with quality and specifications needing careful review against facility requirements.
   – Kitting and logistics services can be particularly relevant for standardized birth packs.

4. Henry Schein – Henry Schein is often associated with distribution serving office-based practices and ambulatory care, with some reach into hospital supply categories depending on region.
   – Its relevance may be higher in systems where maternity care spans clinics, ambulatory centers, and hospitals.
   – Service offerings and contract models vary by country.

5. Owens & Minor – Owens & Minor is known in certain markets for medical distribution and supply chain solutions.
   – Distributor services can include logistics, sourcing support, and inventory optimization—important for facilities managing multiple delivery sites.
   – As with others, coverage and availability of specific items like Umbilical cord scissors vary by geography.

Global Market Snapshot by Country

India

Demand for Umbilical cord scissors is strongly linked to institutional delivery volume, public maternal health initiatives, and the growth of private hospitals. Many facilities balance cost with infection prevention by choosing between single-use kits and reusable instruments supported by CSSD capacity. Urban tertiary centers often standardize branded kits, while rural access may depend on government supply chains and local distributors.

China

China’s market reflects a mix of large urban hospitals with strong procurement infrastructure and smaller facilities with variable access to standardized delivery kits. Domestic manufacturing capacity can reduce import dependence for basic surgical instruments, though brand preference and tender requirements differ by province and hospital tier. Service ecosystems are strongest in major cities, influencing availability of consistent quality and reprocessing support.

United States

In the United States, Umbilical cord scissors are typically embedded in standardized labor and delivery workflows with strong emphasis on infection prevention policy and traceability. Many facilities use preassembled birth packs and rely on large distributor networks, with product choice shaped by contracting and value analysis committees. Rural hospitals may prioritize reliable distribution and backorder resilience to avoid kit substitutions.

Indonesia

Indonesia’s demand is influenced by geographic dispersion across islands, variable facility resources, and ongoing investment in maternal and neonatal care. Import dependence for certain medical equipment can be higher outside major cities, and distributor reach affects product consistency. Urban hospitals may have robust sterile processing for reusables, while smaller sites may prefer single-use kits for operational simplicity.

Pakistan

Pakistan’s market includes high-volume urban maternity centers alongside under-resourced rural facilities where supply continuity can be challenging. Import channels and local manufacturing both play roles, with procurement decisions often guided by affordability and availability. Strengthening standardized delivery kits and reliable distribution can be a major driver of safer, more consistent instrument access.

Nigeria

Nigeria’s demand is shaped by a mix of public sector facilities, private hospitals, and community-based maternity services with varied resources. Import dependence is common for many categories of hospital equipment, and supply chains can be sensitive to currency and logistics constraints. Urban centers may have better access to sterile processing and consistent instrument quality than rural facilities.

Brazil

Brazil has a large and diverse healthcare system where procurement varies between public tenders and private hospital networks. Availability of reusable instruments and sterile processing capability can support long-term use, while single-use kits may be chosen for standardization in high-throughput settings. Regional differences can influence distributor coverage and service support outside major metropolitan areas.

Bangladesh

Bangladesh’s market is influenced by high birth volumes and strong interest in scalable maternal health solutions. Cost sensitivity and facility infrastructure often drive choices between single-use delivery kits and reprocessed instruments. Urban hospitals tend to have more robust procurement and infection prevention oversight, while smaller facilities may rely on centralized supply programs and local distributors.

Russia

Russia’s procurement environment can be influenced by regional supply policies, local manufacturing capacity, and import availability. Large hospitals in major cities typically have stronger sterilization and instrument management infrastructure, supporting reusable options. Remote regions may face longer lead times and rely on distributor networks for consistent replenishment.

Mexico

Mexico’s demand reflects both public health system procurement and private hospital growth, with variability in standardization across institutions. Distributor reach and contracting mechanisms influence whether facilities stock single-use kits or reusable scissors supported by local sterile processing. Urban-rural differences can affect access to consistent instrument quality and timely resupply.

Ethiopia

Ethiopia’s market is closely tied to expansion of maternal health services, workforce training, and the availability of essential birth supplies in primary facilities. Import dependence and donor-supported procurement can shape which products are available and how consistently they are supplied. Urban hospitals may have stronger CSSD capacity than rural health centers, affecting the reusable versus single-use balance.

Japan

Japan’s market typically emphasizes high standards for clinical device quality, workflow reliability, and well-established supply chains. Hospitals often have mature sterile processing and quality governance, supporting consistent instrument performance and reprocessing. Procurement may prioritize supplier reliability, documentation quality, and compatibility with facility infection prevention policies.

Philippines

In the Philippines, demand is shaped by a mix of public hospitals, private maternity facilities, and geographically distributed services. Import dependence for many medical devices can influence pricing and availability, while distributor networks play a major role in ensuring continuity across islands. Facilities may choose single-use kits to simplify infection control where reprocessing capacity is constrained.

Egypt

Egypt’s market includes large public hospitals and a growing private sector, with procurement influenced by tenders, budget constraints, and supply chain variability. Import channels and local production both contribute to availability of basic surgical instruments. Urban centers generally have stronger service ecosystems and sterilization infrastructure than remote areas.

Democratic Republic of the Congo

Access to Umbilical cord scissors in the Democratic Republic of the Congo is often shaped by resource constraints, logistics challenges, and reliance on external procurement support in some areas. Consistent availability of sterile supplies can be difficult outside major cities, making kitted solutions attractive when feasible. Strengthening last-mile distribution and infection prevention capacity can significantly affect safe use.

Vietnam

Vietnam’s demand reflects expanding hospital capacity, rising expectations for standardized care, and a mix of domestic production and imports. Urban hospitals may have strong procurement and CSSD services, supporting reusable instruments and consistent quality checks. Smaller facilities may prioritize affordable, readily available options through regional distributors.

Iran

Iran’s market is influenced by domestic manufacturing capability in some medical equipment categories and variable import access depending on supply conditions. Hospitals may prioritize locally available instruments for continuity, while specialized or branded options may have more limited channels. Service and reprocessing capacity tend to be stronger in larger urban hospitals.

Turkey

Turkey has a substantial healthcare sector with active manufacturing and distribution capabilities, supporting both domestic supply and imports. Hospital procurement often emphasizes standardization and reliable logistics, which can favor kitted delivery solutions. Differences between metropolitan hospitals and smaller provincial facilities can influence access to consistent products and after-sales support.

Germany

Germany’s market typically reflects strong regulatory expectations, structured procurement processes, and mature sterile processing infrastructure. Reusable surgical instruments are commonly supported by well-established reprocessing standards, making documentation and IFU compliance central to purchasing decisions. Supply continuity and quality assurance are key drivers in both public and private hospital systems.

Thailand

Thailand’s demand is shaped by a mix of public healthcare delivery, private hospital expansion, and medical tourism in some urban centers. Import dependence can influence brand availability, while domestic distribution networks determine how well products reach provincial facilities. Hospitals with strong CSSD capacity may favor reusable instruments; others may select single-use kits for operational simplicity.

Key Takeaways and Practical Checklist for Umbilical cord scissors

• Treat Umbilical cord scissors as a safety-critical instrument despite its simplicity.
• Use only scissors intended for clinical tissue cutting, not general-purpose utility scissors.
• Confirm packaging integrity and sterility indicators before opening a sterile scissor pack.
• If a sterile instrument is dropped, treat it as contaminated per facility policy.
• Do not “make do” with dull scissors; replace to avoid crushing and repeated cutting motions.
• Keep fingers and patient tissue out of the blade path before closing the blades.
• Ensure clear visualization and adequate lighting before attempting the cut.
• Stabilize the cord in a controlled way consistent with local protocol.
• Communicate with the team before and after the cut to prevent workflow confusion.
• Plan post-use handling in advance: disposal location or contaminated instrument container.
• Separate clean/sterile instruments from contaminated items at the point of care.
• For reusable scissors, prevent drying of blood/soil by following point-of-use care policy.
• Pay special attention to hinge/box-lock areas during cleaning and inspection.
• Cleaning is not sterilization; reusable scissors generally require both steps per IFU.
• Follow the manufacturer IFU for compatible detergents, cycles, and sterilization methods.
• Do not reprocess single-use scissors unless an approved, compliant program exists.
• Standardize birth kits to reduce last-minute searching and unsafe substitutions.
• Include Umbilical cord scissors availability in obstetric emergency preparedness planning.
• Train new staff on sterile opening, safe passing, and post-use instrument segregation.
• Use simulation to teach teamwork and human factors around time-pressured cord cutting.
• Include scissors in instrument counts where surgical count policy applies.
• Inspect reusable scissors for corrosion, pitting, misalignment, and hinge stiffness.
• Remove damaged instruments from service immediately and route for evaluation.
• Track product identifiers (kit lot, tray ID, SKU) to support defect investigation.
• Report packaging defects, function failures, and near-misses through the incident system.
• Build a no-blame reporting culture so small defects are caught before harm occurs.
• Engage infection prevention early when changing brands, materials, or reprocessing methods.
• Engage SPD/CSSD when evaluating new reusable scissors for cleanability and compatibility.
• Evaluate total cost: purchase price plus reprocessing labor, sterilizer capacity, and repairs.
• Confirm vendor substitution policies to prevent unreviewed product changes in kits.
• Verify latex-free and material requirements based on facility policy (varies by manufacturer).
• Prefer scannable, consistent labeling for inventory control and kit assembly accuracy.
• Ensure rural and satellite sites have the same minimum safe kit content as urban hubs.
• Establish par levels and backorder plans to avoid unsafe improvisation during shortages.
• Clarify roles: clinician use, SPD/CSSD reprocessing, supply chain replenishment, quality oversight.
• Include Umbilical cord scissors in periodic tray audits and delivery kit quality checks.
• When performance varies across batches, quarantine samples and escalate to the supplier.
• Document competency expectations for trainees and ensure appropriate supervision.
• Treat every used scissor as potentially contaminated and handle with appropriate PPE.
• Confirm disposal pathways align with local regulations for contaminated sharps/clinical waste.
• Keep procurement decisions aligned with clinical workflow realities, not catalog convenience alone.

If you are looking for contributions and suggestion for this content please drop an email to contact@myhospitalnow.com